Happy ending gun control

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: 727Sky

A criminal could invite their victim to their house, shoot them, and say they were trying to invade their home.

It is a can of worms if you start to value something above human life, and suspend all critical judgement in such serious circumstances.

One might also sense in the report, a clear bit of racism, too. A little obvious perhaps?

Sure. And if the nice men just want a little loving, it's OK to get some while they are there robbing the home right? I mean, they aren't going to kill anyone, just a little rape.

No, I was not absolving the fictitious men of their fictitious crimes at all. I was just suggesting that the scenario could be other than what you have assumed.

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: 727Sky

A criminal could invite their victim to their house, shoot them, and say they were trying to invade their home.

It is a can of worms if you start to value something above human life, and suspend all critical judgement in such serious circumstances.

One might also sense in the report, a clear bit of racism, too. A little obvious perhaps?

You will never understand the concept of morality , will you ?

No, I clearly can't understand the ongoing sense of moral outrage over what everyone is acknowledging is just fiction.

Most of us can turn off Game of Thrones and live their lives not continually twisted up over the evils of Cersei. It is fiction.

originally posted by: willzilla
Your body is your property, is it not? So the answer is always yes.
a reply to: chr0naut

Is it? Or are you the property of your body? Or are you a creation of divine intent, and therefore not your own, body or soul?

a reply to: chr0naut

You came on here and accused the 11 year old victim of being the perpetrator

Guns save lives, daily

Shooting rapists and home invaders is a noble act and is to be celebrated

I hope this incident (and the THOUSANDS) like it lead to more guns in homes and more guns in the hands of would-be victims (and it will, thankfully)

Now you just go and support the funding of the mongrel mob (an ultra racist gang) by a failed government and leave the defence of an 11 year old to those who oppose crime

YOU are gutted that she was able to defend herself. Her parents aren’t

And the shooting of the second criminal as he was running away is most definitely justified

Hence the girl faces ZERO charges (like the woman who shot Troy Skinner. Ha ha, he’s going to spend more time in prison than Brendan Tarrant does, which is a good thing)

a reply to: Breakthestreak

Fictional or not

Shooting home invaders is a GOOD thing

Nobody disagrees with that

originally posted by: Breakthestreak
a reply to: Breakthestreak

Fictional or not

Shooting home invaders is a GOOD thing

Nobody disagrees with that

Shooting home invaders is a last resort

saying it's a good thing is exactly the reason why some people shouldn't have a gun

If you think an 11 year old is too young to control a firearm

But you think a 16 year old should vote
A 3 year old can decide his own gender
A 14 year old can get an abortion without parental consent

Then YOU are the problem

And shooting home invaders is a FIRST resort, without any doubt at all. There is no argument against that.
They bust in to your home, they get shot. End of story.
Every reasonable person believes that to be the case.

There is NO excuse to allow criminals to break into a home and assault an 11 year old girl (regardless how much the left want it to happen. And they left DOES want it to happen)

One of my daughters is 11. And ALL of my kids know the .357 magnum can shoot through the wall. That’s the one they’ll grab first when they sense something is amiss

And they will ALWAYS face ZERO charges, because home invasion is a crime and self defence is NOT

a reply to: 727Sky

Good for her. She defended herself against armed robbers. People like her are the ones that democrats want to disarm... What China Biden and fake Hispanic O'Reourke have said that they would send the police house by house to take away people's firearms is what every dictatorship in the world has done... The only reason democrats want to disarm law abiding people is because they are criminals and crooks that want to, and are implementing a dictatorship in the U.S.

originally posted by: keukendeur

Shooting home invaders is a last resort

saying it's a good thing is exactly the reason why some people shouldn't have a gun

Which makes you another authoritarian that wants to disarm your political opponents like your pal hitler did, like the castro brothers did and every other dictatorship has done...

Yet another win for the 2nd. Good job. 18 year olds have EVERY right to own a firearm, regardless what the communists want

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Leftists upset about this too

What a strange group

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse

originally posted by: keukendeur

Shooting home invaders is a last resort

saying it's a good thing is exactly the reason why some people shouldn't have a gun

Which makes you another authoritarian that wants to disarm your political opponents like your pal hitler did, like the castro brothers did and every other dictatorship has done...

Knee jerk much??

If you think that shooting people is a good thing than you need a psychological evaluation.

Shooting home invaders IS a good thing

A home invader deserves a bullet in exactly 100% of home invasion cases

ESPECIALLY when the only person home is ELEVEN

a reply to: Breakthestreak

Shooting a home invader can be a necessary thing, inevitable or reasonable even but never a good thing.

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
Good for her. She defended herself against armed robbers.

She didn't defend herself against anything owing to the fact that she isn't real.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Yeah but suppose it was true....lol

Patricia had been a clay-shooting champion since she was nine ie. She could shoot a moving target at distance.

Got a 12-gauge Mossberg 500 shotgun a shoots a man from across the room in his crouch.

That is in and off itself pretty disturbing but before the second guy got to the stairs he was already clipped by young Patricia.

This means she shot a guy in the crouch, stepped over his mangled body wgile he was bleeding out to engage her second target.

After the second guy bled out in the street she saluted the flag, an American eagle landed on he shoulder, she went inside, poured herself a whiskey and carved the two latests targets in the gun like she always did after a succesful kill.

originally posted by: keukendeur
After the second guy bled out in the street she saluted the flag, an American eagle landed on he shoulder, she went inside, poured herself a whiskey and carved the two latests targets in the gun like she always did after a succesful kill.

Sounds believable. Someone should make a thread on that and see who doesn't bother fact checking it.

a reply to: Breakthestreak

Correct me please if I'm wrong;

Many, if not most, 18 year old American's aren't allowed to buy alcohol as they aren't deemed mature enough.....but they can own guns?
American's have to be 21 to buy and smoke cigarettes.....but they can buy guns?

Bizarre.

This whole debate of "Is it ok for you to just shoot, or should you give the benefit of the doubt and only shoot as last resort" when someone trespasses into your home has been had for over 200 years+ and the winning consensus is "Just shoot." So you can pick a part and rationalize any home invasion as having the criminal being the victim, but in reality logic and law dictate that the criminal made that choice, had multiple opportunities to not make that choice, and therefore is simply reaping the results of said choice.

Here is a real life example for you guys. I had my condo years ago broken into while I was in the back bedroom on my PC. I grabbed my 9mm I kept in my desk while he was routing around my living room, stealing my Xbox and anything of value he could grab and put in a bag. I was more liberal back then and I thought I should at least warn the guy to get out and that I was armed; big mistake. As soon as I spoke up the guy lifted his handgun and fired in the direction of my voice while running back to the door, 4 rounds fired. Once he was back at the front door he stopped and waited for me to show myself, I assume to kill me. THEN my neighbor opened their front door across the hall, the guy turned and yelled at them to stay there or he'd shoot them, and it was at that point I was able to move from behind the wall and shoot him. I did twice, did not try to aim at his leg or arm, just two to center mass. He went down and dropped the gun in the process, in which the neighbor ran and picked up. Last I had heard from police he was charged and convicted or attempted murder and felony assault. The gun was black market, serial number shaved off, so he didn't buy it at a gun store.

Now I do not give warning. If you are foolish enough to enter my home I will shoot you and I will not stop until you are no longer a threat. As far as I am concerned if you choose to commit an act that puts your life at risk, then you knew the risk. Period.

This is why there are "Beware of Dog" igns, the law considers this an acceptable warning for anyone coming onto your property, so if they come in and get bitten or maimed, they cannot sue you.

Long story short, don't break the law.

a reply to: Mikemp44

I'm glad you survived that and from your story it seemed very necessary to defend yourself

With the knowledge that he was going to shoot at you it would have even been reasonable to shoot first and ask question later.

What I have a big problem with is saying:

Shooting home invaders IS a good thing

If it makes you feel good to shoot somebody that's an indication that you are acting on the wrong emotions. You got to serve justice and that is a problem.

originally posted by: keukendeur
a reply to: Breakthestreak

Shooting a home invader can be a necessary thing, inevitable or reasonable even but never a good thing.

It absolutely can be a good thing.

It can stop someone from doing it again, and again and again.
Next time might be your house with your mom, or daughter etc.
It might also prevent another would be home invader from making that same stupid choice.