Pfizer to apply for vaccine booster inoculation in August in the US

Well for those that have the first two shots, it should be a breeze to experience another shot, for us that never took it and are still alive and well, thanks but no thanks.

I will still wait until 2024 and see how big pharma gest away with more protection and yes, I am sure by then the babies will be injected right out of the uterus.

Need to get those darn nano particles in as many bodies as pharma can darn it, they need too, soo the next step on targeted treatment can be started.

a reply to: HawkEyi

Not all covid vaccines use mRNA. If you want to believe nonsense you are free to do so, take a different vaccine.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

I know that i was referring to mRNA. But you have polticans, media forcing you two take the two major ones that have mRNA in them.

Can someone explain to me why the mRNA tech was required for these solutions?

Why couldn't a normal vaccine be created?

originally posted by: Tempter
Can someone explain to me why the mRNA tech was required for these solutions?

Why couldn't a normal vaccine be created?

cause thats not how science experiments work.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

All the covid shots available right now uses mRNA, if you know of one that is been used that does not, by any means please tell us.

Why don’t they mention the immunity that having COVID has given you?

a reply to: marg6043

All the covid shots available right now uses mRNA, if you know of one that is been used that does not, by any means please tell us.

Johnson & Johnson.

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

All the covid shots available right now uses mRNA, if you know of one that is been used that does not, by any means please tell us.

The Janssen/Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine is a vector vaccine. AstraZeneca and the University of Oxford also have a vector COVID-19 vaccine. So they dont use mRNA if you want to try these as an alternative. Though i will warn you the side effects tend to be worse.

originally posted by: Tempter
Can someone explain to me why the mRNA tech was required for these solutions?

Why couldn't a normal vaccine be created?

because it was lab made

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

All the covid shots available right now uses mRNA, if you know of one that is been used that does not, by any means please tell us.

Novavax and Astrazenaca. You must have literally done zero research about covid vaccines.

originally posted by: HawkEyi
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

I know that i was referring to mRNA. But you have polticans, media forcing you two take the two major ones that have mRNA in them.

No, they aren't, simply a lie.

originally posted by: Tempter
Can someone explain to me why the mRNA tech was required for these solutions?

Why couldn't a normal vaccine be created?

It wasn't required. There are traditional vector vaccines as well as the Novavax protein based vaccine. The misinformation is strong.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04
Should the word 'traditional' be used when speaking of vector vaccines?

Many traditional vaccines deliver an infectious pathogen or a part of it to our bodies to train our immune system to fight off future exposures to the pathogen.

Viral vector vaccines work differently.

Read how they are different in the link.www.medicalnewstoday.com...

The Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine uses a chimpanzee common cold viral vector known as ChAdOx1, which delivers the code that allows our cells to make the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.

How is that different than:

mRNA vaccines teach our cells how to make a protein—or even just a piece of a protein—that triggers an immune response inside our bodies.

Understanding mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines | CDC
www.cdc.gov...

Put into google search:
"traditional vector vaccines'.....those three words don't appear to belong together.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

So the problem isn't mRNA? Goalposts keep moving.

originally posted by: bobs_uruncle
a reply to: musicismagic

I am laughing like hell, this is never going to end. I am quite sure most of the critical thinkers out there saw this ploy coming. Oh no, it gets weak after 6 months. No, it isn't a vaccine, it doesn't meet the legal definition because it doesn't work.

It's..... The Neverending Story brought to you by big pHARMa ;-)

Cheers - Dave

Thank you for reminding me of my childhood. They won't get away with it uncle Bob or Dave or whoever.

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Itisnowagain

So the problem isn't mRNA? Goalposts keep moving.

Razor you're not so sharp these days, is that the vaccine or something? Would you like me to tell you when? You have lost it when many admired you, you fell for the BS

The Johnson & Johnson vaccine delivers DNA to your cells to make the spike protein, soo is doing what the other shots does, but slyly different approach.

Still mess around wit the human DNA.

I am still waiting for the old way of making vaccines, you know the one that takes several years to make sure it will not cause permanent damage to humans.

The Technology that is been use is a push for targeting treatment and is nothing but an experiment, very troublesome days ahead of humanity in the name of weird science and money making.