-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. - The Truth Won't Be For Everyone - -PART- -7H1R7Y s3v3n-

originally posted by: Guyfriday
a reply to: PioneerFigureSkating

I wonder if he's beginning to try and head off any reports that McAfee is going to dump. I mean he put it out there for a reason, if McAfee dumps information that backs up the A-Chrome thing, then Biden trying to plant the notion that it's just some "Conspiracy Theory" or another "LIE" getting told might be something to think about.

I guess we'll have to wait a few more hours. Just a thought here, but it doesn't excuse this mess, If "KU" is McAfee then could the warning that there would be a massive dump of data as the last post mean that McAfee already knew his fate was sealed?

If McAfee was "KU", but as I have pointed out many times, since it could be anyone McAfee being "KU" would be telling as to the types of intel that has been played with, though things don't really point to him or at least just him being "KU".

He definitely is not Ku....

Likely has a lot of info, but this new site is likely just another Austin whateverhisnamewas trying to be something.

I would be shocked beyond belief if anything came out at 2am EST that would change the world.

Is there anything about the time that it is supposed to open that has anything to do with media at all? If something hits that late on a Thursday, surely it would be lightly reported on over a weekend.

Seems a odd time to release for maximum coverage.

Where the actual frak am I living at this point? Seriously, what the hell happened?








She's going to be on meds for the rest of her life due to the clotshot.

AND THIS!




My two cents, they're as ready as they'll ever be. DOITQ.

originally posted by: Vasa Croe


Is there anything about the time that it is supposed to open that has anything to do with media at all? If something hits that late on a Thursday, surely it would be lightly reported on over a weekend.

Seems a odd time to release for maximum coverage.

Well that's the thing. If the data that is leaked is very powerful and hard-hitting to the point that people are talking about it, then it can dominate Fridays press and bleed through the whole weekend before the folks in DC can get around to dealing with it on Monday. This was why Trump was big on releasing news on Thursdays. So doing a dump at that time makes sense from a theatrics standpoint, but you better be bringing something great to the forefront or you've lost any interest in anything you might release in the future.

SO dumping data at the start of a Friday is going to be big or nothing. Even if the information is just good like "hey so and so has funded GOF", it won't matter, it would need to be something along the lines of "Political so and so is scene in this snuff film offing a kid they raped". It has to be big. You don't go out and release something like UFOs are real at that time, you release something along the lines of hey a UFO just landed on the Capital Mall.

We'll see I guess, but the possibilities of you being correct, and this is just another Ass-tin kid is pretty high.

White House today.....she is told it is a Head of State Departure but there sure are a lot of Black SUV's parked everywhere. This is a pretty long video. I stopped watching after she shows all of the vehicles.

web.telegram.org...

Perhaps Flynn and Mcaffe were both part of the Ku team. Mcaffe with intel from virus scans and Flynn with specific targeted intel from Pegasus?

a reply to: Guyfriday

Good call on him trying to get out in front of the McAfee thing. You're probably right. And as another poster pointed out last night, this McAfee thing is likely the reason Republicans are turning coat and going all in on vaccinations lately - even the golden child Desantis.

I don't feel like McAfee is likely to be Q, but I don't think there is any doubt that his information has been folded into the plan by now.

Guy, something you may consider personally, is that maybe Q doesn't actually have "it" all. Maybe that itself was part of the necessary disinformation. What if "Q" is simply an advanced algorithm that figured out how to take it all down with a simply psyop campaign on the internet designed to be a pressure cooker type campaign?

Do I believe that's the case? No. But the point is that we know nothing about Q. There are a potential myriad of reasons why they are "gate keeping." In the end, the results speak for themselves. Twice in the last 24 hours the "President of the United States" has felt it necessary to speak towards accusations that he is a blood sucking pedophile. Let that sink in...

originally posted by: ZoraD1994
Perhaps Flynn and Mcaffe were both part of the Ku team. Mcaffe with intel from virus scans and Flynn with specific targeted intel from Pegasus?

I am honestly thinking this all goes back to Inslaw and PROMIS....he likely had some dealings with or hand in the software.

Same video form 2 day ago but it is now set to music then a Trump speech then Frank Sinatra singing the best is yet to come. Also has this above video in the white area Matrix University Classes are now open: Voter Fraud 1 0 1 and Eugenics 1 0 1

Sorry if it's already been posted.

www.ingersolllockwood.com...

www.mediaite.com...
mediaite.com/news/breaking-multiple-people-shot-along-one-of-dcs-busiest-streets-prompting-diners-to-flee-area-restaurants

Breaking news out of Washington, D.C. Thursday evening, as shots were reportedly fired in a popular restaurant and bar district along one of the city’s busiest streets, sending diners fleeing from their table

a reply to: FlyingFox

Hum? Jim Acosta was there? I bet this is going to be blamed on some political groups refusal to banish guns from the kingdom, or maybe it was some anti-vaxx'er getting the covid, but since Jim was there I wonder how long till Trump is blamed.

originally posted by: PioneerFigureSkating


Do I believe that's the case? No. But the point is that we know nothing about Q. There are a potential myriad of reasons why they are "gate keeping." In the end, the results speak for themselves. Twice in the last 24 hours the "President of the United States" has felt it necessary to speak towards accusations that he is a blood sucking pedophile. Let that sink in...

Good point, "have everything" is an assumption we've made. We've also destroyed ourselves by creating our own expectations.

I'm going to toss this out. I was purged the last 5 times I said "nothing is going back to as it was" but the other day it stayed.

Currently we see the most draconian planetary efforts in play. Lock downs, floods, jabs, food shortages, inflation, unemployment, rampant lawlessness etc. All pretty indicative of both PANIC and monumental change.

One thing to consider, "you're going to love the ending" probably doesn't mean as of now, what folks think it meant 3 years ago. Don't be surprised if an entirely new governmental system emerges when the fraud is exposed = this is WW. More council then top down dictatorship as we have now. As such, defining what Q was will take on a whole other meaning post change. Just kicking the tires on the idea of course.

originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: Justoneman

Would be nice to have a translation of some of the stuff being posted on that McAfee TG account.

Maybe because we had Q, I didn't notice, but there seems to be a bunch of accounts that seem to be posting important stuff, but without an explanation, one can't be sure. Frustrating.

a reply to: crankyoldman

Remember back in the 70's when gas prices skyrocketed out of control. 60cents a gallon was ridiculous. Now days anything around 2 USD a gallon and its a sweet find.

People might love the ending just because it's over. It doesn't mean that they love the results though. I'm going to be a negative nanny here and say; "What if everyone is going to love the ending. Like how everyone loved Stalin" It's not true that people loved Stalin, but if asked and you said anything but yes you do, you won't get a chance to be asked again.

Words HAD meaning once. Now it's all memes. We are watching a full on assault on the rights and freedoms of the worlds population, Earth created disasters erasing people and land from existence, and diseases both made and natural killing off the population. This happened before (check out the 1300's) it will happen again. How this ends can't be determined until it ends.

a reply to: Thoughtful1
Good points. TWICE in the past 6 months Joe Biden has said all hospital beds will be filled with Alzheimer's patients, in 15 years or less.

twitter.com...


COVID-21 through -49 coming soon...


twitter.com...

a reply to: Guyfriday

People might love the ending just because it's over. It doesn't mean that they love the results though

Except, and I noticed that you skipped over my post, the results seem, so far, to have the POTUS concerned about the very things we accuse him of. Enough so that he has spoken on it twice in the last 24 hours. Lashing out at it even.

Also, did you just try to draw reference to Stalin from Q?

Yeah, you did.

Man, you can talk about how your skepticism is what it is due to your time on this site and all of that, but to someone like myself (or I'm guessing any other genuine truth seeker having been at this awhile too), when you do things like this, try as you might to conceal it, your true colors shine through.

You are unwilling to consider anything other than your preconceived notion that Q is bad. You ask the same question of Q over and over and when you are answered a multitude of times with potential, logical answers, you make pretend those posts never existed and simply ask the same question again.

Now you seem to be trying to compare a dude we know nothing about, who is producing results, to a notorious dictator.

It's pretty pathetic, man.

originally posted by: PioneerFigureSkating


You are unwilling to consider anything other than your preconceived notion that Q is bad. You ask the same question of Q over and over and when you are answered a multitude of times with potential, logical answers, you make pretend those posts never existed and simply ask the same question again.

Maybe look at what I said differently than what you read. The point I was saying is that in Soviet Russia, Stalin was the last word on anything. If you didn't love what he was doing it was over for you. I didn't say "KU" was going to off anyone that didn't like the end results. I meant (and this might be the place where people got post) that just because it is said that we will love it, doesn't always mean that deep down we even like it. It's a thought just a thought.

Ok so let me address the point I quoted from you above. At no time has anyone actually answered my question about if "KU" have become corrupted or not. Nobody here can answer that until we see some results from "KU", but the perception of "KU" holding onto information and not doing anything with it while people suffer and die, is a little bit on the malicious side human nature. So unless "KU" was to finally act on what they have, we have to calculate that nothing that "KU" has will come to light. The fact that some information has come to light in the past puzzles of information means that at least at the time of those typing's "KU" and us were on the same side. Since "KU" has been silent that can no longer be said with certainty.

You say that your a "Truth Seeker", but you seem to be (and please correct me if I'm wrong) blindly wanting to follow "KU" as well. Here's a question, it has nothing to do with "KU" but it does have to do with acceptance:
"If Jesus came back and told you that the way to Heaven is to kill a non-believer. Would you do so, or would you point out that it is wrong to take a life and in so doing question his validity as the real Jesus?"

After all we were warned that an Anti-Christ would show up as well as a real Christ. How do we know what is real unless we question it first to gather the information to decide what the truth to us looks like?


You should have read the other part of that quote:

I'm going to be a negative nanny here and say; "What if everyone is going to love the ending. Like how everyone loved Stalin" It's not true that people loved Stalin, but if asked and you said anything but yes you do, you won't get a chance to be asked again.

Notice how I put out the notion that I was going to speak from a negative standpoint for a minute? that was important, then the follow up was showing as an example, how just because people say they love something doesn't make it true. Being told that we are going to love it, and actually loving it can be two different things. I also, as you quoted, pointed out that people might love the ending because the mess is over with. Sure we might all love it because we're left with unicorn farts and rainbows made from the blood of our enemies. Until we get information from "KU" or see the conclusion of this mess we can't just assume anything. Blindly following the belief of a person who don't know but has stated that lying is sometimes needed, is kind of off to me if you really want the truth.

a reply to: Guyfriday
Well I wish I had the answer to that kuestion myself.......Maybe there is going to be a type of antidote revealed used to counteract what has been done, I mean if we believe that Q has been making predictions from 2017 that we are seeing go down now, would it really be so far fetched to believe that a cure was developed before he them let this virus loose on the world or maybe there never was a covid-19 just the flu but since the test swabs and as we've already heard from the inventor of those test swabs they are not accurate and weren't developed to be used as an aid used to determine a diagnosis anything. Maybe Q is a time traveler or Jesus Christ comin home to take the trash out. Any of those things would make what was shared and what was not shared irrelevant.

a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

The thing about archaic viruses is that population was sparse back when they last circulated. Now, all bets are off. High transmissibility might have been a survival trait for them.

a reply to: FlyingFox

I wonder how long it was for Fauci to need money for "non-GoF" research to begin on these. And now we need to worry about the "Covid Mammoth Variant"