It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In a 2008 academic paper, President Barack Obama's appointee to head the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs advocated "cognitive infiltration" of groups that advocate "conspiracy theories" like the ones surrounding 9/11.
..
Conspiracy Theories
Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 08-03
U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 199
U of Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 387
30 Pages Posted: 17 Jan 2008 Last revised: 18 Jan 2010
Cass R. Sunstein
Harvard Law School; Harvard University - Harvard Kennedy School (HKS)
Adrian Vermeule
Harvard Law School
Date Written: January 15, 2008
Abstract
Many millions of people hold conspiracy theories; they believe that powerful people have worked together in order to withhold the truth about some important practice or some terrible event. A recent example is the belief, widespread in some parts of the world, that the attacks of 9/11 were carried out not by Al Qaeda, but by Israel or the United States. Those who subscribe to conspiracy theories may create serious risks, including risks of violence, and the existence of such theories raises significant challenges for policy and law. The first challenge is to understand the mechanisms by which conspiracy theories prosper; the second challenge is to understand how such theories might be undermined. Such theories typically spread as a result of identifiable cognitive blunders, operating in conjunction with informational and reputational influences. A distinctive feature of conspiracy theories is their self-sealing quality. Conspiracy theorists are not likely to be persuaded by an attempt to dispel their theories; they may even characterize that very attempt as further proof of the conspiracy. Because those who hold conspiracy theories typically suffer from a crippled epistemology, in accordance with which it is rational to hold such theories, the best response consists in cognitive infiltration of extremist groups. Various policy dilemmas, such as the question whether it is better for government to rebut conspiracy theories or to ignore them, are explored in this light.
Keywords: conspiracy theories, social networks, informational cascades, group polarization
hh and the self aggrandizement
Ironic since you have been pro-every conspiracy theory that has been proven wrong about President Trump. If there is no legitimacy whatsoever comes from the very people whom since 2016, and even before, kept claiming "Russians put Trump in the White House" and every idiotic thread including "Trump is an illegitimate POTUS" and every other made up lie every far leftist/anti-Trumper has made in these forums that has been pushed by your kind for almost 5 years now.
originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
a reply to: Blue Shift
Anyway, what could possibly be more interesting than understanding the NWO, Agenda 21, depopulation by weaponized vaxx, and Chinese world takeover plans?
originally posted by: DAVID64
Of course we're being monitored.
We are those who dare to have an opinion, rather than follow the herd. We question the official narrative and that seems to disturb them the most.
* waves to DHS * Hi Guys ! You know Orwell's 1984 wasn't a playbook, right ?
originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: Boadicea
Read my posts in this thread.
I link directly to a video of him saying it.
I see derangement from those pushing it.
Psychological projection is a defense mechanism in which the ego defends itself against unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves and attributing them to others
originally posted by: Poofmander
a reply to: carewemust
Ahh and the self aggrandizement kicks in, I know everyone wants to think that we are important enough to be watched and monitored.
But also publicly posting, "hey do you think they watch us" is honestly one of the most silly things I've ever seen or experienced, because if you think they are, now you just let them know you think they are....
If you want to think of this as an intelligence war you don't go publicly posting like that unless you are dishonest, setting people up, or an agent yourself...
I understand you wish and hope for what transpires on this forum to be important, and yes exchange of information is important, but if you really think we are being watched/infiltrated watch what you say and how you say it.
But also if this forum is anything it's been infiltrated by disinfo a gents that may or not know thats what they are...basically anyone who believes in Q I believe is a part, wether they know it or not, of a massive disinfo campaign.
Just my thoughts tho
originally posted by: Grenade
Seriously tho, i've never seen any kind of threats or stoking of violence on ATS. Must be our words they fear.
originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: WakeUpBeer
Trolling each other isn’t a threat to government. This is a discussion forum not some extremist recruitment website.