Could AboveTopSecret be One of the Political Extremist Platforms DHS Says it Now Monitors?

It's more extreme when they shut down and delete normal opinions especially when facts are involved 😵‍💫

I think it doesn't matter if we are or aren't what they say or are watching for.

The Coptic Egyptian film maker wasn't what they said he was either.

All that matters is that this place carries a veneer of what they want others to think it could be for thin plausibility. If they want us, they'll find us, and we'll make excellent sacrifices to make everyone else feel better about their government "doing something" against extremism.

a reply to: carewemust

Yes, but ats has always been monitored so nothing new here.

a reply to: drewlander

Maybe sometimes we all need a reminder that we're
being monitored.

originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: karl 12
On a side-issue, this post appears on my account as a reply to me, which confirms what I have long thought about an occasional glitch in the software.
I suspect that chronaut does NOT find it on his own list of "replies received".

I can confirm that.

I would have missed karl12's reply if I hadn't been going back over the thread, because I never received notification that they had replied to me.



My guess is that these errors are not systematic, but occur when people are manually editing or trying to control the narrative.

On a side note, there was a lecturer talking about the Echelon monitoring of telephony (which the US denied, but all the other of the 5 eyes countries confirmed) who was doing a tour, and he had faxed ahead the details of his agenda for the symposium. He happened to see a copy of the received fax, and he held it up beside the fax he sent, at the conference. They were in different fonts.

I can think of no better confirmation of what he was lecturing about.

originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: carewemust

This site has been watched for years so the simple answer is yes. Though some of my favorite rumors was springer was actually CIA.

You probably don't remember this

The problem is we all knew it wasn't true but I guarantee it put the site on watch lists.

I doubt if the CIA learned very much from monitoring AboveTopSecret.com. What would they have been looking for in 2012 anyway?

originally posted by: 727Sky
They would be bigger idiots than some think already if they do not monitor this site and many many others if their goal is to tag someone. Unfortunately you have to wonder if this will be a "tag and release" at some future date.

You listen to some of the talking heads in D.C. and you wonder what planet or country they arrived from ?

As we've seen time and time again, the people who the Government "monitors" are NOT the ones that commit the attacks.

"The FBI knew of ______________, but was not monitoring him.", is the statement we often hear after a bomb attack, or a mass shooting.

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: carewemust

You getting worried are you?

Yes! Joe Biden's Administration is overreaching so aggressively, federal judges are reeling them in with regularity. But they don't seem to be getting the message.

originally posted by: DAVID64
Of course we're being monitored.
We are those who dare to have an opinion, rather than follow the herd. We question the official narrative and that seems to disturb them the most.

* waves to DHS * Hi Guys ! You know Orwell's 1984 wasn't a playbook, right ?

Liberal newscasters and pundits are of the opinion that former President Trump is committing a criminal act, every time he says the 2020 election was rigged and stolen by Joe Biden.

originally posted by: Nunyabizisit

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: Nunyabizisit

Facts like bamboo particles eh?

What a joke.

You do realize that not many buy the bamboo fiber thing, right?

And that many believe it was another democrat projection attempt?

That only democrats seem to be all that concerned about it?

And most important, that the equipment that was already being used for ballot scanning is perfectly capable of identifying bamboo (and other) fibers if present?


The audit team is using the correct processes and technologies to determine the facts about this, and most other ballot related suspicions.

While you are just repeating the democrat's misinformation propaganda in pathological effort to smear audit.

Desperate panic?

Or just unintelligent?

Just thought I’d come back and readdress the bamboo fibres thing.

A man named Jovan Pulitzer is your right wing white knight that help start this lie.

You can watch him make those claims HERE

And before you change the goal posts again and claim he’s “compromised” or an agent or whatever fantasy thing you want to make up, here’s a search page from one of the right’s favourite websites, The Gateway Pundit…

LINK

Jovan Pulitzer is a regular there.

I can’t wait to see what mental gymnastics you will perform to spin this one.

Have at it!

originally posted by: Chadwickus

originally posted by: Nunyabizisit

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: Nunyabizisit

Facts like bamboo particles eh?

What a joke.

You do realize that not many buy the bamboo fiber thing, right?

And that many believe it was another democrat projection attempt?

That only democrats seem to be all that concerned about it?

And most important, that the equipment that was already being used for ballot scanning is perfectly capable of identifying bamboo (and other) fibers if present?


The audit team is using the correct processes and technologies to determine the facts about this, and most other ballot related suspicions.

While you are just repeating the democrat's misinformation propaganda in pathological effort to smear audit.

Desperate panic?

Or just unintelligent?

Just thought I’d come back and readdress the bamboo fibres thing.

A man named Jovan Pulitzer is your right wing white knight that help start this lie.

You can watch him make those claims HERE

And before you change the goal posts again and claim he’s “compromised” or an agent or whatever fantasy thing you want to make up, here’s a search page from one of the right’s favourite websites, The Gateway Pundit…

LINK

Jovan Pulitzer is a regular there.

I can’t wait to see what mental gymnastics you will perform to spin this one.

Have at it!

Not moving any goal posts.

Have wanted forensic audits since democrats passed motor voter.

That didn't change because someone thinks that 2020 election may have included fake ballots that were printed overseas.

These claims didn't make looking at the ballots any more or less important.

And didn't alter the audit process.


Keep trying though, you might eventually stumble into a logical arguement.

Before you eventually realize that there are zero good arguments for not looking at 2020 ballots to confirm that they match the dominion counts.

So why are democrats so desperate to prevent audits?

a reply to: Nunyabizisit

Yeah you are moving goal posts.

You said..

You do realize that not many buy the bamboo fiber thing, right?

And that many believe it was another democrat projection attempt?

I’ve shown this is 100% false.

The fact that you are now doubling down and pretending this isn’t what we’re talking about speaks volumes.

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: Nunyabizisit

Yeah you are moving goal posts.

You said..

You do realize that not many buy the bamboo fiber thing, right?

And that many believe it was another democrat projection attempt?

I’ve shown this is 100% false.

The fact that you are now doubling down and pretending this isn’t what we’re talking about speaks volumes.

Pretending nothing.

A few people obviously bought into the bamboo thing.

And that changed absolutely nothing about the audit process.

So keep projecting bamboo stories all you want.

Won't have any effect on AZ Audit.

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: Nunyabizisit

Yeah you are moving goal posts.

You said..

You do realize that not many buy the bamboo fiber thing, right?

And that many believe it was another democrat projection attempt?

I’ve shown this is 100% false.

The fact that you are now doubling down and pretending this isn’t what we’re talking about speaks volumes.

"And most important, that the equipment that was already being used for ballot scanning is perfectly capable of identifying bamboo (and other) fibers if present?

The audit team is using the correct processes and technologies to determine the facts about this, and most other ballot related suspicions.

While you are just repeating the democrat's misinformation propaganda in pathological effort to smear audit.

Desperate panic?"


Maybe you have a problem comprehending simple english?

a reply to: Nunyabizisit

Hey, you tried to pretend the bamboo thing was just made up by the Democrats.

I’ve proven that 100% false.

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: Nunyabizisit

Hey, you tried to pretend the bamboo thing was just made up by the Democrats.

I’ve proven that 100% false.

Ok, I don't have any problem with you believing that.

Doesn't make it so.

And won't have any effect on audits.


I hoped joe's ATS monitors would figure that out by now, but hey, they apparently still think people believe their russia hoax wasn't a complete fabrication.

So maybe we just have to get used to democrats flailing around about ballot bamboo?

Hoping that everyone will forget all this nonsense about verifying that the physical ballots match the dominion counts?

Yeah, that's not gonna work.

I have heard lots of rumors of what the AZ audit has found. I am waiting until all the details have been checked, verified and publicly released before jumping to any conclusions. If it takes a bit longer than what some hope, so be it. As long as they get it right is the important part. With the way this has been playing out there is going to be a lot more legal challenges to follow. Getting to the rock solid, hard evidence does take time and will make or break any legal challenges and media spin that will follow.

Hang in there AZ, my prayers are with you, whatever you find.

originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: carewemust

This site has been watched for years so the simple answer is yes. Though some of my favorite rumors was springer was actually CIA.

You probably don't remember this

The problem is we all knew it wasn't true but I guarantee it put the site on watch lists.

We also found out that the ATS servers after they where bought from the original owner that hosted it in the UK and himself is from the UK where then all of a sudden hosted in ....Langley.

That became visible because the "Ghostery" browser extension came out and into the public.

(Yes i have been with ATS since its inception in the UK)



EDIT: i had not watched the video that you embedded as i seen a couple like this before but i was just watching it and it mentions and shows exactly what i just mentioned.

a reply to: carewemust

Could AboveTopSecret be One of the Political Extremist Platforms DHS Says it Now Monitors?

Of course! But I think it's worse than that... I think they instigate as well.

Back after the election, there was a whole lot of stupid talk on this board from certain members encouraging armed revolution and civil war... too much. And it became especially ramped up and reckless after January 6.

I thought then and I still think now that it was far more than just incensed ATS patriots doing the rabble rousing....

a reply to: Chadwickus

...readdress the bamboo fibres thing.

So what's the problem with ruling out an accusation that was made -- and believed -- by many? You consider it important enough to readdress... so why was it wrong for the auditors to address it in their audit?

What's the problem? Seriously. I've asked as many posters as have brought it up, and not one has provided a response. Why wouldn't you be happy the auditors are trying to rule it out?