Goverment UAP report is here.

originally posted by: Mantiss2021
In reading over the published "Summary", I noticed that it is never mentioned , nor is there any reference to any materials or "debris" recovered from a downed UAP.

That's because there is none. Tech that can move those objects like they are, cannot fail. We have only that much airplane incidents per year. Air travel one of the safest out there. With this said, what are the chances of 'alien' vessel to fail?

originally posted by: Borys
You can get a better idea about this display from:

trace.tennessee.edu...

I'm afraid I'm not finding that document too helpful regarding AESA since it's from 2006 and the first AESA were installed in 2007.

originally posted by: Encounter2
That's because there is none. Tech that can move those objects like they are, cannot fail. We have only that much airplane incidents per year. Air travel one of the safest out there. With this said, what are the chances of 'alien' vessel to fail?

In the case of the Roswell craft, which was described as being held together with scotch tape, I'm not surprised that after traveling for trillions of miles, it was ready to fall apart and crash.


Hal Puthoff admitted "Arts Parts" could be industrial slag instead of parts from a crashed space ship, but his company was glad to accept money to test them anyway.

a reply to: vlawde



A comment from me to another back on 19May2021 and sent for your Thread.

Sent: Wed, May 19, 2021 7:23 am
Subject: Re: FYI--from a Canadian friend / COMMENT

Things are getting pretty amped up. I never saw this video. Its almost like some of what was filmed in the 1940's over the ocean. Here's what I did

I use my FastStone Image enhancer software. Just a cheap and free software for anyone. I paused and took a screen shot of the video @ 0:03 seconds. I zoomed in 400% and reduced noise [Detail] by 200% and [chrominance] by 800%. I then put the shot in negative. These guys seem to use some sort of Yehudi Lights as a countermeasure so you cant see them clearly. There are software programs that cost $20,000 that the FBI and INTEL use to clarify the image. The stuff released to the public is 101. I have all in my files and could describe them in detail but I didn't categorize them properly.

Here's what I see. I am seeing a 5 sided geometric shape. The atmosphere around the object has the typical bubbly, wispy cloudy atmosphere such as an ionized atmosphere. I also see what appears to be a fin or tail in the upper left portion of the object. Also, can you see what appear to be five tiny dark circles located at 1:00, 3:00, 5:00, 7:00 and 9:00 on the object. Those are anti gravity propulsion systems that I have read from other UFO experts

Note that I began to lose some of the clarity so I stopped.

Can you see what I am seeing in the enhanced image. Its tough but its there.

Can you see it? [RH] Click mouse to increase image once downloaded to your PC.

Link

originally posted by: Waterglass
a reply to: vlawde

That UFO sure looks a lot like these four IFOs to me:


www.youtube.com...

I think that it's an abhorrent, and stupid tactic by the U.S. Navy or the USAF, for them to not bother trying to radio contact communicate with these purported alien, aerial vehicles in our airspace --- Or maybe the Navy or Air Force already has...but they're not revealing it to the public.

originally posted by: Arbitrageur

originally posted by: Waterglass
a reply to: vlawde

That UFO sure looks a lot like these four IFOs to me:

www.youtube.com...

This also looks like the orb that flew left to right across the screen before we saw the Tsunami hit in Japan, 2011.

Here's the video.


This is the point in the video I spotted the orb.


Here's my screen grab.


Here is a closer look.


The sort of black dot in the middle. If you rewind the video a couple of secs, you see it come down from the top centre of the screen, cross the screen diagonally down to the right and disapear off camera.

The footage i spotted this on live back then, i believe, was from a camera farther up the beach, the orb follows just behind where the wave collapses and the trail of it is visible over the white water.

originally posted by: Erno86
I think that it's an abhorrent, and stupid tactic by the U.S. Navy or the USAF, for them to not bother trying to radio contact communicate with these purported alien, aerial vehicles in our airspace --- Or maybe the Navy or Air Force already has...but they're not revealing it to the public.

Spot on Erno and they've been playing games with the average man in the street for far too long. You seen em I seen em many people on ATS and out there in the general public have seen em too, yet the militaries of Planet Earth and specifically in our cases the USA and the UK act as if they are hiding the truth from us

originally posted by: djz3ro

originally posted by: Arbitrageur

originally posted by: Waterglass
a reply to: vlawde

That UFO sure looks a lot like these four IFOs to me:

www.youtube.com...

This also looks like the orb that flew left to right across the screen before we saw the Tsunami hit in Japan, 2011.

Here's the video.

I'm getting a message: invalid youtube video URL.

Here is a closer look.

It's so blurry, what if anything makes you think it's not a bird?

a reply to: Arbitrageur

I caught this on the live newsfeed, that fateful day. What i observed and have seen discussed here was a sphere with a tail, a bit like a comet's but both were black, not solid black though. I've never seen a birl look perfectly spherical with trail following behind.

Here is the full link...

www.youtube.com...

originally posted by: djz3ro
a reply to: Arbitrageur

I caught this on the live newsfeed, that fateful day. What i observed and have seen discussed here was a sphere with a tail, a bit like a comet's but both were black, not solid black though. I've never seen a birl look perfectly spherical with trail following behind.

Here is the full link...

www.youtube.com...

That link works, you remembered the "n" this time. You forgot to include the "n" in your earlier link which is why it was broken.

It's not perfectly spherical, but anything far enough away will look like a dot, and you could call a dot "round".

I don't see anything about the UFO that rules out a bird. It's too fuzzy to identify but it's at the beach and moving much like a bird moves but it's so unclear you can't identify it. The trail is probably a photographic artifact of the slow shutter speed and the motion of the bird or whatever it is. It's overcast, so there's not much available light, so slow shutter speeds can lead to trails appearing on moving objects.

Here's a capture at 1:13 just as it crosses into the edge of the tidal wave. That's the ocean to the upper left and the white behind the UFO is the leading edge of the tidal wave.



That's only 3 pixels or so tall, so not enough resolution to identify it. Nothing in that video is sharp or clear, everything is fuzzy and blurry, even what looks like a large building I can barely confirm it's a building because the video is so fuzzy, so with conditions like that of course identifying something as small as a bird clearly would not be expected, we would expect to see a bird appear as it does, blurry.

This is a few seconds earlier at 1:01, and I think it's a building but it's so blurry I can barely confirm it's a building, so I don't know why if you can't even clearly see buildings, you would expect to see a bird clearly.

a reply to: Arbitrageur

Nice;

Here's another



This guy was in my back yard. I surmise it was up in space over 60 miles away. The video was sent to The Black Vault. The green marks are their investigator seeing a triangle. Leaked UAP report as per Richard Dolan states that they have advanced craft prototypes but never flew anywhere outside of Area 51. They are either lying or others are here. This guy flew just like what Robert Lazar filmed in the desert in 1989 outside of Area 51:





Open pic in another tab and look for the faint circles. Those are Gravity Amplifiers?

a reply to: mirageman

What this? Meteor skips off earths atmosphere? That's the story as pushed on us. Bull sheet.




Here's something else:

UFO report was like a sci-fi movie containing 14 videos, but government covered it up
www.ibtimes.co.in...

The UAP report made to Congress by the Pentagon suggested that new and improved reporting procedures be supported in the military budget.

OK, I get that.

But I would also like to suggest, very strongly, that an effort be made to reach out to the FAA, through the Secretary for the US Department of Transportation, directing the FAA to REQUIRE all professional pilots, ATC personnel, and flight line crew to immediately report sighting of, or contact with UAP's.

If this phenomenon is to, finally, be taken seriously, then we need all hands on deck, and that means ending the stigma of reporting "UFOs" ASAP.

And the best way to do that, I think, is to make such reports Mandatory.

Sorry for my english ...

In my opinion they (US intelligence) are initiating a slow disclosure because they are securing the staff of previous generations from legal action. For this reason they only focus on recent cases.
In my opinion these people are punishable for crimes against humanity because they have hidden the presence of "entities" dangerous for humanity itself.
This disclosure will be a slow process because they need time ...

originally posted by: gippo888
Sorry for my english ...

In my opinion they (US intelligence) are initiating a slow disclosure because they are securing the staff of previous generations from legal action. For this reason they only focus on recent cases.
In my opinion these people are punishable for crimes against humanity because they have hidden the presence of "entities" dangerous for humanity itself.
This disclosure will be a slow process because they need time ...

If ETs are coming here and not showing themselves, they, and not we, are primarily responsible for the lack of disclosure.

It's rude.

originally posted by: mbkennel

If ETs are coming here and not showing themselves, they, and not we, are primarily responsible for the lack of disclosure.

It's rude.

I think they are not visitors from other planets, I think they have always been here and they behave like a rancher with his property (Charles Fort)
We have to change the situation ...
I'm not saying US intelligence is the enemy, I'm just saying it protects its employees but at the same time it doesn't tell us the truth.
A very difficult truth to reveal ...

"UFO's Loom As A National Security Threat Over Washington D.c."

originally posted by: gippo888

originally posted by: mbkennel

If ETs are coming here and not showing themselves, they, and not we, are primarily responsible for the lack of disclosure.

It's rude.

I think they are not visitors from other planets, I think they have always been here and they behave like a rancher with his property (Charles Fort)
We have to change the situation ...
I'm not saying US intelligence is the enemy, I'm just saying it protects its employees but at the same time it doesn't tell us the truth.
A very difficult truth to reveal ...

Pretty much spot on from experience and they are around us all of the time. We just can't see them, unless they drop their guard or want us to

originally posted by: ufoorbhunter
Pretty much spot on from experience

and they are around us all of the time. We just can't see them, unless they drop their guard or want us to

If they didn't want to be seen, they wouldn't use lights in the night or follow military ships ...