It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: KansasGirl
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: KansasGirl
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: KansasGirl
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
originally posted by: Realtruth
a reply to: ScepticScot
so quick math:
27.192 delta cases with vax, 68 deaths, 0.25% death rate
53.822 delta cases non vaxed, 38 deaths, 0.07% death rate
so vaxed people have a 4 times higher chance to die if they get delta
Ah, but you're forgetting that most of the unvaxxed are young and healthy, while the vaxxed include the oldest and most vulnerable. So it is to be expected that they have a higher mortality rate.
So the “vaccine” isn’t effective?
The numbers suggest it is very effective.
Sorry if you are struggling to follow that.
Considering the number of breakthrough cases that have been reported, even WITH the cycle threshold turned down (not a conspiracy theory but official information), and the number of people who have died from covid-19 even though they had all their shots, suggests that it’s not effective.
Furthermore, mask and socialism distancing guidelines are still in effect. Why do “unvaccinated” people need to wear masks, if they are with “vaccinated” individuals? Does the vaccine not protect you? Seems it does not.
Only if you don't understand the numbers.
A much higher % of the population has been vaccinated, therefore there should be far more serious cases amongst the vaccinated.
The fact there isn't shows it is working.
This is absolute idiotic logic.
originally posted by: Sparkymedic
Why should anyone get the vaccine? Seems like it does absolutely nothing other than cause issues.
Also, why get an experimental gene therapy if there are viable therapeutics like ivermectin?
originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: Realtruth
Like UK, 90% of new China Virus cases in Israel are Delta variant...so this is germane:
Half of Adults Infected in Latest COVID-19 Outbreak Were Fully Vaccinated: Israeli Official
About 90 percent of new COVID-19 infections in Israel were caused by the CCP virus’s Delta variant, officials said, while adding that about half of the adults infected in the recent outbreak were fully vaccinated.
truthbasedmedia.com...
If accurate...being "vaccinated" does absolutely nothing to protect one from being infected.
originally posted by: flice
originally posted by: Sparkymedic
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: KansasGirl
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: flice
You do realize I laid out the argument that clearly shows vaccination offers substantial protection against the delta variant.
Then why do the companies who make them say that they do NOT offer protection?
They say their vax offers no protection? Please show me that. Love to see that source.
www.thelancet.com...
You consider 0.84% effectiveness as protection?
It's misread. The ARR should be read the other way around... so it signifies the risk of getting infected.
To explain ARR:
If you have 10.000 vaccinated people and 100 get sick, that yields an ARR of 1%.
But that was with the Alpha strain right? So that ARR is useless now for both sides of the table.
Delta has clearly shown this.
originally posted by: Sparkymedic
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: Sparkymedic
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: Realtruth
a reply to: ScepticScot
so quick math:
27.192 delta cases with vax, 68 deaths, 0.25% death rate
53.822 delta cases non vaxed, 38 deaths, 0.07% death rate
so vaxed people have a 4 times higher chance to die if they get delta
As 80%+ adults have had at least 1 shot your numbers would suggest that non vaccinated are getting covid at about 8x the rate of vaccinated and therefore more likely to die.
Or vaccinated are far less likely to even get symptoms so don't get tested.
That doesn't take into account the relative demographic of who has been vaccinated which would suggest the vaccine is even more effective.
Oh look, it's the village idiot/ troll.
Anyway...
www.thelancet.com...
Pfizer Relative Risk Reduction is 95%.
But that doesn't take into account the overall background risks as the RRR only reports those who benefit from the vaccine.
Unlike the Absoloute Risk Reduction, which considers ALL background risks and gives a real world picture of effectiveness.
The Pfizer Absoloute Risk Reduction is 0.84%.
Essentially, the vaccines do FU#K ALL to protect anyone from anything. Same as masks. Same as 2m distancing. ALL BULLSH!T.
But hey, if you want to line up and be part of the experiment...have at it! I wouldn't even consider stopping you from getting a jab or wearing a mask or being isolated. You do you. But like any religion...don't push your belief system on myself or anyone else.
If this was truly a deadly pandemic then we wouldn't need the governments PR campaigns to convince us...it would be obvious. But that's just not the reality, is it.
Instead, it's a very contagious, hardly lethal virus which is endemic and super destructive to the global economy due to moron politicians.
You call me the Village idiot while demonstrating you don't understand the numbers you are quoting .
www.reuters.com...
Care to cite a peer reviewed article and not the mainstream media?
originally posted by: Sparkymedic
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: Sparkymedic
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: Realtruth
a reply to: ScepticScot
so quick math:
27.192 delta cases with vax, 68 deaths, 0.25% death rate
53.822 delta cases non vaxed, 38 deaths, 0.07% death rate
so vaxed people have a 4 times higher chance to die if they get delta
As 80%+ adults have had at least 1 shot your numbers would suggest that non vaccinated are getting covid at about 8x the rate of vaccinated and therefore more likely to die.
Or vaccinated are far less likely to even get symptoms so don't get tested.
That doesn't take into account the relative demographic of who has been vaccinated which would suggest the vaccine is even more effective.
Oh look, it's the village idiot/ troll.
Anyway...
www.thelancet.com...
Pfizer Relative Risk Reduction is 95%.
But that doesn't take into account the overall background risks as the RRR only reports those who benefit from the vaccine.
Unlike the Absoloute Risk Reduction, which considers ALL background risks and gives a real world picture of effectiveness.
The Pfizer Absoloute Risk Reduction is 0.84%.
Essentially, the vaccines do FU#K ALL to protect anyone from anything. Same as masks. Same as 2m distancing. ALL BULLSH!T.
But hey, if you want to line up and be part of the experiment...have at it! I wouldn't even consider stopping you from getting a jab or wearing a mask or being isolated. You do you. But like any religion...don't push your belief system on myself or anyone else.
If this was truly a deadly pandemic then we wouldn't need the governments PR campaigns to convince us...it would be obvious. But that's just not the reality, is it.
Instead, it's a very contagious, hardly lethal virus which is endemic and super destructive to the global economy due to moron politicians.
You call me the Village idiot while demonstrating you don't understand the numbers you are quoting .
www.reuters.com...
Care to cite a peer reviewed article and not the mainstream media?
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
I don't know, maybe because it appears you are hundreds of times more likely to die if you are at risk if you don't take it ... maybe thousands of times more likely.
originally posted by: Sparkymedic
originally posted by: flice
originally posted by: Sparkymedic
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: KansasGirl
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: flice
You do realize I laid out the argument that clearly shows vaccination offers substantial protection against the delta variant.
Then why do the companies who make them say that they do NOT offer protection?
They say their vax offers no protection? Please show me that. Love to see that source.
www.thelancet.com...
You consider 0.84% effectiveness as protection?
It's misread. The ARR should be read the other way around... so it signifies the risk of getting infected.
To explain ARR:
If you have 10.000 vaccinated people and 100 get sick, that yields an ARR of 1%.
But that was with the Alpha strain right? So that ARR is useless now for both sides of the table.
Delta has clearly shown this.
Care to share how you are able to flip info around?
Ahhh, yes the strains....the MUTANTS...
Anyone have actual scientific proof of virus isolation...and not a media article. Like actual peer reviewed article.
originally posted by: Sparkymedic
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: Sparkymedic
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: Realtruth
a reply to: ScepticScot
so quick math:
27.192 delta cases with vax, 68 deaths, 0.25% death rate
53.822 delta cases non vaxed, 38 deaths, 0.07% death rate
so vaxed people have a 4 times higher chance to die if they get delta
As 80%+ adults have had at least 1 shot your numbers would suggest that non vaccinated are getting covid at about 8x the rate of vaccinated and therefore more likely to die.
Or vaccinated are far less likely to even get symptoms so don't get tested.
That doesn't take into account the relative demographic of who has been vaccinated which would suggest the vaccine is even more effective.
Oh look, it's the village idiot/ troll.
Anyway...
www.thelancet.com...
Pfizer Relative Risk Reduction is 95%.
But that doesn't take into account the overall background risks as the RRR only reports those who benefit from the vaccine.
Unlike the Absoloute Risk Reduction, which considers ALL background risks and gives a real world picture of effectiveness.
The Pfizer Absoloute Risk Reduction is 0.84%.
Essentially, the vaccines do FU#K ALL to protect anyone from anything. Same as masks. Same as 2m distancing. ALL BULLSH!T.
But hey, if you want to line up and be part of the experiment...have at it! I wouldn't even consider stopping you from getting a jab or wearing a mask or being isolated. You do you. But like any religion...don't push your belief system on myself or anyone else.
If this was truly a deadly pandemic then we wouldn't need the governments PR campaigns to convince us...it would be obvious. But that's just not the reality, is it.
Instead, it's a very contagious, hardly lethal virus which is endemic and super destructive to the global economy due to moron politicians.
You call me the Village idiot while demonstrating you don't understand the numbers you are quoting .
www.reuters.com...
Care to cite a peer reviewed article and not the mainstream media?
originally posted by: KansasGirl
Holy ssh!t, did you SERIOUSLY just use SNOPES as a fact-check? Anything you have ever said or will say is now null and void. Not a single person who can think critically uses SNOPES. Have you zero self-respect? I can’t believe you actually used Snopes. 😂
Seriously. Look into Snopes, man.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Sparkymedic
Why should anyone get the vaccine? Seems like it does absolutely nothing other than cause issues.
Also, why get an experimental gene therapy if there are viable therapeutics like ivermectin?
So in the US we went from 4000 deaths per day to 300 now and dropping, maybe that is why. I don't think you have a clue to how mRNA actually works and why it is important to establish t-cell and not just start with a nuevo virus. There is no gene therapy going on here.
The mRNA mirrors the COVID RNA but it is inert and will not reproduce viruses as the body takes time to make a signature for the virus in its immune system.
I know of 4 people within friends and families that died to COVID and a dozen that spent weeks in a hospital. I know of none who has have a bad reaction to the vaccine other than one person felt they had the flu for 5 days then all was good. Myself and family got either zero symptom to the vaccine or one day...So where are ALL these issues outside of your bias search?
originally posted by: Sparkymedic
How CONVENIENT and lazy of you.
Haha...the information sure is out there. LoL
British Airways pilot Edward Brice-Bennett, 33, died on a mountain trail bike park on June 2, 2021. There was no mention of a COVID-19 vaccine in an article published by the New Valley News. "A post mortem examination showed two conditions, abdominal trauma and haemoperitoneum, but no cause of death had yet been ascertained," the publication reported.
While Synnott and Brice-Bennet both died in early June. The third pilot publicly identified was Senior First Officer Grant Mercer, who passed away on May 4, 2021. His fundraising pages notes any leftover funds will be donated to the charity CALM: "Campaign Against Living Miserably (CALM) is leading a movement against suicide. Every week 125 people in the UK take their own lives. And 75% of all UK suicides are male. CALM exists to change this."
The Liberty Bugle article shared a tweet with a 1-minute recording of what seems to be a male voice claiming to have insider information about BA pilots' deaths and a government investigation into the situation:
originally posted by: Sparkymedic
Ya can't fix stupid.
originally posted by: KansasGirl
Of course it is meaningless...to you. You’re unable to think critically or recognize evidence when it is kicking you in the ass.
originally posted by: KansasGirl
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: KansasGirl
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: flice
You do realize I laid out the argument that clearly shows vaccination offers substantial protection against the delta variant.
Then why do the companies who make them say that they do NOT offer protection?
They say their vax offers no protection? Please show me that. Love to see that source.
It’s in their application for approval.
You can listen to a recording as well, if a Moderna spokesperson telling a customer that the “vaccine” offers no protection against covid-19 and only may lessen the severity of symptoms if one get covid-19. He also admits they have seen many cases of paralysis due to Guillian-Barre and other syndromes, and many other injuries. The recording is contained in a podcast that you likely won’t accept, though the recording can’t be denied as it’s a recorded call to Moderna’s covid-19 “vaccine” help line.
originally posted by: Sparkymedic
How people cannot see through this tripe is beyond me. But then again, fear shuts down the ability to use critical thinking.
Anyway, while I do find this site interesting at times, I do have a life to live. So, I'm going to go take some really big risks, because life is all about risk...and rip up some fun twisty roads and drag a knee with my bike.
Peace out.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: KansasGirl
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: KansasGirl
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: flice
You do realize I laid out the argument that clearly shows vaccination offers substantial protection against the delta variant.
Then why do the companies who make them say that they do NOT offer protection?
They say their vax offers no protection? Please show me that. Love to see that source.
It’s in their application for approval.
You can listen to a recording as well, if a Moderna spokesperson telling a customer that the “vaccine” offers no protection against covid-19 and only may lessen the severity of symptoms if one get covid-19. He also admits they have seen many cases of paralysis due to Guillian-Barre and other syndromes, and many other injuries. The recording is contained in a podcast that you likely won’t accept, though the recording can’t be denied as it’s a recorded call to Moderna’s covid-19 “vaccine” help line.
That same recording has the Moderna spokesperson laughing and telling the woman with G-B...that EVERYONE taking the "vaccine" is part of their clinical trial.
originally posted by: flice
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: KansasGirl
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: KansasGirl
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: flice
You do realize I laid out the argument that clearly shows vaccination offers substantial protection against the delta variant.
Then why do the companies who make them say that they do NOT offer protection?
They say their vax offers no protection? Please show me that. Love to see that source.
It’s in their application for approval.
You can listen to a recording as well, if a Moderna spokesperson telling a customer that the “vaccine” offers no protection against covid-19 and only may lessen the severity of symptoms if one get covid-19. He also admits they have seen many cases of paralysis due to Guillian-Barre and other syndromes, and many other injuries. The recording is contained in a podcast that you likely won’t accept, though the recording can’t be denied as it’s a recorded call to Moderna’s covid-19 “vaccine” help line.
That same recording has the Moderna spokesperson laughing and telling the woman with G-B...that EVERYONE taking the "vaccine" is part of their clinical trial.
I think a few of us are waiting for the link instead of the resumé of it.