It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: dug88
a reply to: davegazi2
The singer argued that a new flag including stars and stripes that were "OFF-white" would be "the colors of ALL of us — your skin tone and mine — like the melanin scale"
If that's what she's going by, since when are white people the literal shade of bright white found on the US flag? It doesn't match any actual skin colour already....
and then offered a sketch of a proposed flag design that included stars of varying tones.
That would look so #ing stupid.
The entire suggestion and reasoning behind it is just #ing stupid.
It's every bit as stupid and cringe-worthy as it sounds. TWO YEAR OLD KIDS do better work with finger paint and their food.
Either avert your eyes for protective purposes, or prepare to pee your pants laughing uncontrollably:
www.marketwatch.com...
I had to link-hop through the article's hotlinks to find that eyesore. Even YAHOO wouldn't put in in theirs, which says something there.
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: dug88
a reply to: davegazi2
The singer argued that a new flag including stars and stripes that were "OFF-white" would be "the colors of ALL of us — your skin tone and mine — like the melanin scale"
If that's what she's going by, since when are white people the literal shade of bright white found on the US flag? It doesn't match any actual skin colour already....
and then offered a sketch of a proposed flag design that included stars of varying tones.
That would look so #ing stupid.
The entire suggestion and reasoning behind it is just #ing stupid.
It's every bit as stupid and cringe-worthy as it sounds. TWO YEAR OLD KIDS do better work with finger paint and their food.
Either avert your eyes for protective purposes, or prepare to pee your pants laughing uncontrollably:
www.marketwatch.com...
I had to link-hop through the article's hotlinks to find that eyesore. Even YAHOO wouldn't put in in theirs, which says something there.
originally posted by: BlankUsername
a reply to: davegazi2
Why stop at 52 , is she racist against Pacific Islanders? If we are going to go the route she wants why not 54 for American Samoa and Guam?
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: davegazi2
Has anyone told Macy Racist Gray to fluck right off? Because that would be the most apt response to her libtarded gibberish.
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: davegazi2
but:
Don’t rely on celebrities for X
www.washingtonpost.com...
Just sayin.