Prostate Cancer-Infertility-Link to China Virus Vaccine

a reply to: DBCowboy

So we can agree both carry risks, and it should be left up to each person to make their decision on what risk they think is higher.

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: Dalamax

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: PapagiorgioCZ
How is no one asking how and why? I's supposed to make you produce the spike protein, learn immunity against it and that's it. How is a spike protein making people have seizures, strokes and prostate cancer markers? Or that bell's palsy. Crazy how a spike protein makes one side of their face paralyzed but not the other.
We should look back on the Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon petition. Once women realize they are allergic to placenta years from now it will be too late. There should be a research into how these side effects are even possible

The vaccine is not giving anyone prostate cancer markers. The vaccine is supposed to initiate an immune response. Part of the immune response can be inflammation. I think it very possible many of these side effects are part of an inflammatory response.

I think there are two important things. One, this needs to be studied so the vaccines become safer, two, the risk of contracting covid and then developing a serious life altering case is higher than from the vaccine.

Your an idiot.

You're you mean. If you are going to insult someone's intelligence you should probably use correct grammar. Anyone who thinks no one is at risk from covid is someone who simply does not care about facts. Willful ignorance is your choice, you are welcome to it.

I’d really love to just see one of those facts.
But you know you can’t prove it.
You just have to keep faith in your lord Fauci

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: DBCowboy

So we can agree both carry risks, and it should be left up to each person to make their decision on what risk they think is higher.

Sure.

I am all for freedom to choose.

As long as it is never mandated.

originally posted by: EmmanuelGoldstein

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: Dalamax

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: PapagiorgioCZ
How is no one asking how and why? I's supposed to make you produce the spike protein, learn immunity against it and that's it. How is a spike protein making people have seizures, strokes and prostate cancer markers? Or that bell's palsy. Crazy how a spike protein makes one side of their face paralyzed but not the other.
We should look back on the Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon petition. Once women realize they are allergic to placenta years from now it will be too late. There should be a research into how these side effects are even possible

The vaccine is not giving anyone prostate cancer markers. The vaccine is supposed to initiate an immune response. Part of the immune response can be inflammation. I think it very possible many of these side effects are part of an inflammatory response.

I think there are two important things. One, this needs to be studied so the vaccines become safer, two, the risk of contracting covid and then developing a serious life altering case is higher than from the vaccine.

Your an idiot.

You're you mean. If you are going to insult someone's intelligence you should probably use correct grammar. Anyone who thinks no one is at risk from covid is someone who simply does not care about facts. Willful ignorance is your choice, you are welcome to it.

I’d really love to just see one of those facts.
But you know you can’t prove it.
You just have to keep faith in your lord Fauci

You are so hilarious your blind rage keeps you from seeing anything other than what your bias projects into your mind. Fauci is a flip-flopping fool who should be under investigation if we had actual justice in this country.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: DBCowboy

So we can agree both carry risks, and it should be left up to each person to make their decision on what risk they think is higher.

Sure.

I am all for freedom to choose.

As long as it is never mandated.

I have stated numerous times I am completely against mandated vaccination, vaccine passports, and hope anyone who tries to do that gets sued.

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: EmmanuelGoldstein

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: Dalamax

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: PapagiorgioCZ
How is no one asking how and why? I's supposed to make you produce the spike protein, learn immunity against it and that's it. How is a spike protein making people have seizures, strokes and prostate cancer markers? Or that bell's palsy. Crazy how a spike protein makes one side of their face paralyzed but not the other.
We should look back on the Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon petition. Once women realize they are allergic to placenta years from now it will be too late. There should be a research into how these side effects are even possible

The vaccine is not giving anyone prostate cancer markers. The vaccine is supposed to initiate an immune response. Part of the immune response can be inflammation. I think it very possible many of these side effects are part of an inflammatory response.

I think there are two important things. One, this needs to be studied so the vaccines become safer, two, the risk of contracting covid and then developing a serious life altering case is higher than from the vaccine.

Your an idiot.

You're you mean. If you are going to insult someone's intelligence you should probably use correct grammar. Anyone who thinks no one is at risk from covid is someone who simply does not care about facts. Willful ignorance is your choice, you are welcome to it.

I’d really love to just see one of those facts.
But you know you can’t prove it.
You just have to keep faith in your lord Fauci

You are so hilarious your blind rage keeps you from seeing anything other than what your bias projects into your mind. Fauci is a flip-flopping fool who should be under investigation if we had actual justice in this country.

No rage here. And definitely not blind.
I just think you have no idea what you’re talking about and it’s dangerous to other less-informed readers.

Although, I guess that would be you, so... carry on with your fantasy of an actual virus that is not just this years coronavirus.

a reply to: EmmanuelGoldstein

What you think is meaningless. Truth does actually exist despite some claiming it doesn't. You don't get to have your own version of it.

If you have actual facts and data present it.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04
I asked you for proof of covid 19.
You know damn well there isn’t anything real you can point me to.
In this world of lies one must trust their own logic.

I ask again, and one would think that this would be very easy to provide: where is the proof that Covid 19 is more than a brand name for this years ‘novel’ coronavirus.

I can wait as long as you need to show us all the proof.

a reply to: EmmanuelGoldstein
Ok ....
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

I have treated the patients, seen them get better, seen them die ...

We both know you aren't asking for proof because anything given you will dismiss.

Can you show me any other coronavirus with similar infection/death rates as this one? In 2003 we had SARS, about 8,000 total infections. Maybe you don't see a difference though ....

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

This link is to pure propaganda, not proof.
There is no proof on that site.
Just reports and data that is clearly biased towards the results they are looking for.

Again, around 500,000 Americans die every year of the coronavirus. And we have more people in the us each year, so therefore we have more dying.

If you put each death on the big screen and in the headlines then yeah, people who don’t know any better become scared and end up getting experimental vaccines.

Good luck!

a reply to: EmmanuelGoldstein

Like I thought. Any sources I can read?

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

You could start with 1984.

a reply to: EmmanuelGoldstein

How about I start with your sources on yearly deaths due to coronavirus.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

I've been thoroughly enjoying this, you are an absolute champ.

It's amazing how so many committed to "denying ignorance" are constantly reciting propaganda distributed from a dozen or so twitter accounts...

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: IAMTAT

Wait till the world sees what "science" has done to vaccine takers in a year or two.

I hope you are wrong , but you know the mess is brewing . They already have a new variant of covid to blame all the future complications of vaccines on . My question to every vaccine getter is simple : If the FDA allowed an experimental drug with next to zero clinical trials and labeled it an experimental treatment for arthritis with zero laboratory liability….. would you get that shot ?
Now arthritis will effect every human on earth by age 35-40 and cause minor to severe health issues , so does that make sense or sound like a sound logical plan ?

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Doctors are finding high Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) levels in CV "vaccinated" men.
High PSA levels are also a prime indicator of prostate cancer:

Palm Beach County urologist seeing false PSA levels in men due to COVID vaccines

The blood level of PSA in men is often elevated when diagnosed with prostate cancer, but Rubinowics says research is showing if you recently got your COVID-19 vaccine, PSA levels could be temporarily elevated.

cbs12.com...
(emphasis mine)

Doctors call these high levels "false" because the "vaccinated" men have not been previously diagnosed with prostate cancer.

High PSA levels are also connected to male INFERTILITY:

Infertile Men Have Higher Prostate-Specific Antigen Values Than Fertile Men

Conclusions: Infertile men have higher PSA values than fertile individuals. Of all, almost one out of three primary infertile men younger than 40 yr has a first total PSA value of >1 ng/ml.

Patient summary: In this study, we observed that (1) infertile men have higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values than fertile individuals and (2) a greater proportion of infertile men younger than 40 yr had total PSA >1 ng/ml at the first assessment. These data might be relevant to study the potential clinical impact of more rigorous screening in primary infertile men.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...
(emphasis mine)

The takeaway here is that higher than normal levels of the same antigen which indicate prostate cancer and male infertility...are now being detected in men who've just received the China Virus "vaccine".

This should be concerning...and looked into much more closely.

It has actually been known for some time that acute infections and vaccinations in general can cause temporary elevated PSA readings. It would seem that anything that kicks your immune system into overdrive can cause this. I actually wouldn’t be surprised if getting COVID19 turns out to have the same effect.

I guess you didn’t know that.

originally posted by: Hecate666
All I can say is that people who add unknown concoctions to their bodies are by default more at risk for any future complications than somebody who doesn't.
The same way that people who live a dangerous lifestyle are more at risk of injuries or death, compared to someone who lives a sedated life.
Only they are doing it with a previously untested mixture of a variety of things. Do they really think there won't be ANY consequences only unicorns and clapping fits?

Facepalm.

Stop being so sensible.
You know it only confuses them!

a reply to: 1947boomer here is something interesting on the female side of things...turned out some women got the covid vaccine and then got the mammogram about a week or so later they had enlarged lymph nodes turned out no cancer but inflamation from the covid vax temporarily enlarged their lymph nodes...do no schedule the 2 close together

a reply to: IAMTAT
Not surprised, I was claiming this since the beginning. But most of it got dismissed when the Chinese stated it reduces fertility rates. (Check the date on my big reveal post).

Hope you don't get badmouthed like I did back then. But history repeats itself. When you have a man who wants to depopulate the world, and his fingers are in every cookie jar vaccine you can bet your ass. "To save your life, someone else won't have a child" will be full fledged agenda.

Many countries actually limited births to replacent of the parents. But the past 10years china removed those restrictions(that should tell you). As BG decided to stick his nose into Chinese politics.

Sadly you can't claim it's "just" vaccines, it's also GMOs, car pollution, plastics and pesticides in water and food, and more, (About 5-10% of cases as birth rates were 1 out of 4 women couldn't conceive in 2000-2010.).

While yes, the vaccines probably account for 25-50% historically.

***Developed only*** countries have now 1 out of 3 as of 2015-2020 statistics - new statistics will be underway in the next couple of years- as currently it's only miscarriage rates that have gone up 400%

There is also environmental causes that Mr. Sticky fingers has his hands in.




So places like Africa, and Nigeria(not just them, any place without a mainstream healthcare system) don't have massive slowdowns. They do account for a good 30-40% of population growth statistically speaking. But they also have next to no healthcare/vaccines.

"Through vaccines and healthcare we can reduce the population" -BG has proven to be 100% correct.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Really seems like that person is either talking bullsh* or using anecdotal evidences as a rule, or even worse; self agrandizing. Either way it stinks.

And don't worry about nyiah, persons just simping really hard. "There's no reason to EVER insult her" sounds like something a neckbeard says about their twitch gamer girl