It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Prostate Cancer-Infertility-Link to China Virus Vaccine

page: 4
31
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 10 2021 @ 06:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: IAMTAT

It's likely a result of inflammatory responses if I had to guess. It's interesting not alarming.


No offense, but nurses guessing doesn't cut the mustard.
This red flag needs serious study.

You win, the vaccine causes prostate cancer. I suggest you get the study going.


Again, you're guessing...and being a bit childish, as well.

What we DO know is that elevated levels of the same 'prostate-specific' antigen which is used as an indicator for prostate cancer and male infertility...is now being detected in men who've just received the China Virus "vaccine".

Something unexplained, unexpected, and well worth researching is taking place between the "vaccine" and the prostate.

Could the "vaccine", long-term, cause prostate cancer or infertility in men?
Very possibly.
Certainly seems worth finding out before taking the jab...given this concerning and unexplained PSA activity.



posted on Jun, 10 2021 @ 06:16 PM
link   
NVM
edit on 10-6-2021 by vonclod because: NO VALUE IN MY POST



posted on Jun, 10 2021 @ 06:21 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

Not only that, but as seen in another thread, there's an issue with pericardial inflammation.

Is the vax allowing people who might be susceptible to health issues getting them.

Would love to see a study on Complement Cascade, IGG, IGM studies done on vaccinated folks.



posted on Jun, 10 2021 @ 06:39 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

So according to that it is likely inflammation, which the OP mocked me for suggesting as the likely cause.

Part of the immune response includes inflammation. Systemic inflammation is not unique to covid-19 vaccines. Covid-19 carries the risk of systemic inflammation as well, so a vaccine to Covid-19 giving that risk would not seem crazy to me.

Should this be looked at? Should the vaccine be improved as much as possible? Yes and yes. Is temporary elevated PSA by itself a reason to avoid the vaccine? I would say no, each person can make their own decision.



posted on Jun, 10 2021 @ 06:41 PM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Name me one other vaccine that causes a rise in PSA, causes a rise in pericardial inflammation and you may have a point.



posted on Jun, 10 2021 @ 06:45 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

It's also an indicator of aging, why aren't you suggesting the vaccine is linked to aging? You took a potential good thread topic, which is a temporary increase in PSA, and turned it into a LOL worthy thread by linking the vaccine to prostate cancer.



posted on Jun, 10 2021 @ 06:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Name me one other vaccine that causes a rise in PSA, causes a rise in pericardial inflammation and you may have a point.

This thread is not about pericardial inflammation. It's about the link between the vaccine and prostate cancer and infertility, which does not exist. There is a thread on pericardial inflammation, you are welcome to see my post in that thread here.
Pericardial inflammation thread

Here are several sources on the inflammatory response of vaccines that are not Covid.

www.sciencedirect.com...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

HPV and neuroinflammation
www.oatext.com...

Is it that you think the vaccine is riskier than covid? Or riskier than other vaccines? Or both?



posted on Jun, 10 2021 @ 06:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: IAMTAT

It's also an indicator of aging, why aren't you suggesting the vaccine is linked to aging? You took a potential good thread topic, which is a temporary increase in PSA, and turned it into a LOL worthy thread by linking the vaccine to prostate cancer.


The article in the opening/original post of the thread is from CBS12 out of West Palm Beach. This is a CBS affiliate directly owned by Sinclair Broadcast Group. SBG owns over 40% of the local broadcast market in the US.

Explain how he made the "LOL-worthy link" when a country-wide national broadcast affiliate published the damn thing first?
edit on 6/10/2021 by Nyiah because: (no reason given)


Edit: Use your head, common sense dictates this would never have come up past patients & doctors if there wasn't a reason to warrant the alerting of others. And "just to avoid panic" is not a reason. Low-key heads-up article is low-key, but obvious.
edit on 6/10/2021 by Nyiah because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 10 2021 @ 07:01 PM
link   
a reply to: Nyiah

I missed it, show me where the vaccine is linked to having prostate cancer in the source. Just quote where they say it.

The source is about delaying a prostate exam due to the potential for elevated PSA, there is no link to prostate cancer. I am man enough to admit when I am wrong, just show me where Prostate Cancer is linked to the vaccine.
edit on 10-6-2021 by OccamsRazor04 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 10 2021 @ 07:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Nyiah

I missed it, show me where the vaccine is linked to having prostate cancer in the source. Just quote where they say it.


Show ME an existing, trusted vaccine that does this to your nads.

Otherwise, you're beating around the bush. There was no need for this to be news if it's no big deal and you know it.



posted on Jun, 10 2021 @ 07:05 PM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

I'm no nurse, just a clinical engineer with a BS in Biological Sciences and a Masters in Neurobiology.

But I listen to experts.

And interestingly enough, I've yet to meet a respiratory therapist who would take the vaccine.
edit on 10-6-2021 by DBCowboy because: Covid drank my beer



posted on Jun, 10 2021 @ 07:07 PM
link   
a reply to: Nyiah

June is men's health month which means there will be above average levels of PSA testing. It's not a big deal, and the source says so.

Dr. Rubinowicz recommends delaying your PSA test a few weeks after your most recent COVID-19 vaccination and/or going for a second PSA test if you and your physician are concerned about a false elevation.


So wait a few weeks after getting the vaccine and then everything is normal per the Dr. reporting this. I know I know, the sky is falling.



posted on Jun, 10 2021 @ 07:13 PM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Beat around the bush much?

Vaccines that also cause this reaction.

Their names would be nice to cross-reference with. Got any to share with the class? You keep harping dismissively, including dismissing 2 previous requests to show us that sweet, sweet other-vaccines-also-do-this money. The article and call it a draw & we'll go with my perception of it's intent is damn well moot at this point.

Pony up.



posted on Jun, 10 2021 @ 07:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

I'm no nurse, just a clinical engineer with a BS in Biological Sciences and a Masters in Neurobiology.

But I listen to experts.

And interestingly enough, I've yet to meet a respiratory therapist who would take the vaccine.

I am lucky to work at a major ranked hospital where I don't have to do a whole lot because we have respiratory therapists who do basically all the breathing treatments, manage the hi-flow oxygen, and end up doing a lot of my trach care for me. I never ask anyone whether they took the vaccine or not because it's not my business. With that said, when the vaccines were first made available many people were asking whether others had taken it, and I never heard a single RT say no and heard several say yes. There was no pressure to say yes, I said no and no one made me feel like I had to get it. I didn't get mine until my parents bought their house down here and were going to move down. Me and my wife both preferred not getting the vaccine because we are low risk for covid complications, my parents are high risk though so we bit the bullet.

With all that said, all of that is just a bunch of logical fallacies and meaningless. The data is the only thing that matters and the data is hard to use due to the inflation of Covid deaths and all the lies being pushed about the vaccine.

Both sides want to push a narrative, wish we could get past that.



posted on Jun, 10 2021 @ 07:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: Nyiah
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Beat around the bush much?

Vaccines that also cause this reaction.

Their names would be nice to cross-reference with. Got any to share with the class? You keep harping dismissively, including dismissing 2 previous requests to show us that sweet, sweet other-vaccines-also-do-this money. The article and call it a draw & we'll go with my perception of it's intent is damn well moot at this point.

Pony up.

Sorry, I don't jump when you call. As I said, should be moved to LOL as what the OP posted is not found in the source at all. I already sourced other vaccines initiating an inflammatory response ... much worse than a temporary rise in PSA. Don't be mad because you didn't bother reading the source and did not realize the source never linked the vaccine to prostate cancer and now you feel silly after claiming it did.



posted on Jun, 10 2021 @ 07:24 PM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Myocarditus is not a myth nor is it made up.

PSA increases are not a myth either.

My son has taken the vaccine. He's 18, it was his choice.

Now I worry.



posted on Jun, 10 2021 @ 07:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Myocarditus is not a myth nor is it made up.

PSA increases are not a myth either.

My son has taken the vaccine. He's 18, it was his choice.

Now I worry.

Covid is not a myth either.



posted on Jun, 10 2021 @ 07:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: Nyiah
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Beat around the bush much?

Vaccines that also cause this reaction.

Their names would be nice to cross-reference with. Got any to share with the class? You keep harping dismissively, including dismissing 2 previous requests to show us that sweet, sweet other-vaccines-also-do-this money. The article and call it a draw & we'll go with my perception of it's intent is damn well moot at this point.

Pony up.

Sorry, I don't jump when you call. As I said, should be moved to LOL as what the OP posted is not found in the source at all. I already sourced other vaccines initiating an inflammatory response ... much worse than a temporary rise in PSA. Don't be mad because you didn't bother reading the source and did not realize the source never linked the vaccine to prostate cancer and now you feel silly after claiming it did.


You don't take 'Fine, then I'm wrong" well, do you? Enough goal post moving.

I DID real the damn thing, you win nothing here, how do you think I know who owned them? it's at the bottom of the page, UNDERNEATH the article.



posted on Jun, 10 2021 @ 07:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Nyiah

No goalpost moving needed. The source never links the vaccine to prostate cancer. Just show me where it does. Quote it please.



posted on Jun, 10 2021 @ 07:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Myocarditus is not a myth nor is it made up.

PSA increases are not a myth either.

My son has taken the vaccine. He's 18, it was his choice.

Now I worry.

Covid is not a myth either.


I never said covid was a myth. It was a Chinese weapon used to destabilize global economies.



new topics

top topics



 
31
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join