Predicting Global Population Decline

originally posted by: ZeroFurrbone
So if we have babies : Overpopulation will end us .

If we don't have babies: Population declining and will end us.

Make up your minds >.> We survived with barely under 1 billion in population , we can survive with less than 7 >.>

Not when the world really can't survive long term with more than about half a billion people.
Too many worthless eaters suckling off the teets of society these days.

Poison the host, poison the teets... anyone too dumb or unlucky to fend for themselves gets to starve.

Good thing I won't be around in fifty years- the next twenty will be bad enough.

The BBC and Channel 4 both ran very short segments on "population decline" in recent months also. By chance I happened to catch both segments (as I don't usually watch TV), they both prophesised our global populations will be decimated by 2100, the offered no explanation other than declining birth rates and each were subtitled "New World Order".

I kid you not.

So... where should the people who want to live migrate to?

originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: AutomateThis1

Good lord I forgot that part... been married 14 years and the dating scene has certainly changed.

I am terrified for my son entering this insanity eventually... thankfully he isnt even 3 yet and hopefully a measure of sanity comes back before he is dating age.

I hope for his sake too.

I've just about given up.

The problem is that more intelligent humans have less children. Sadly, dumbasses are much more prolific at reproduction than smarter people.

a reply to: TonyS

Another failing times garbage piece.



a reply to: infolurker

Edwin A. Deagle, Jr., Ph.D.
Director, International Relations
The Rockefeller Foundation 🤡

Edwin Deagle was also listed as an active member of the CFR in 2016.
Dr. Edwin A. Deagle Jr. passed away on February 16th, 2021. Obit

a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

"http://www.deagle.com/"

Interesting side note: 2 of my browsers saying its not secure, but Opera used to allow me there. Opera is a chromium based browser, Edge is saying not secure; now I feel justified in going back to Firefox.

a reply to: Metallicus

If everyone had small families and less kids, where would the labourers com from?. To get to the type of society envisioned by Asimov, where there are 5-10 robots per household is still a few thousand years away.

a reply to: lordcomac

Not when the world really can't survive long term with more than about half a billion people.

Ehrlich has been proven wrong and so has Malthus. What science do you use to state categorically about 1/2 billion?.

Asimov suggested that Trantor slighlty larger than Earth supported 40 billion. HE wrote that in 1951, at the beginning of the decade of prosperity. People live in small apartments in Tokyo Milan Rome to name a few. They use available space more efficiently.


www.google.com... tYP2NBpe-3LUP4ZCsmA0&oq=most+productive+form+of+agric&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAEYADIGCAAQFhAeOgUIABCRAjoICAAQsQMQgwE6CwguELEDEMcBEKMCOggILhCRAhCTAjoECAAQQ zoQCC4QhwIQsQMQxwEQrwEQFDoCCAA6BQguELEDOgUIABCxAzoICC4QsQMQkwI6BwgAEIcCEBQ6CAguEMcBEK8BOggILhCxAxCDAToECAAQAzoFCAAQyQM6CAgAEBYQChAeOgUIIRCgAVCL4hFY8ZU SYJqzEmgAcAF4AYABjgOIAYo3kgEIMC40LjIzLjOYAQCgAQGqAQdnd3Mtd2l6uAEDwAEB&sclient=gws-wiz


"10 Sustainable Agriculture Methods and Farming Practices
Hydroponics and Aquaponics.
Urban agriculture.
Agroforestry and food forests.
Polycultures and crop rotation.
Heirloom and older varieties.
Natural animal raising.
Natural pest management.
Mulching and manual weed control."



google

How long can Earth sustain human life?
This is expected to occur between 1.5 and 4.5 billion years from now. A high obliquity would probably result in dramatic changes in the climate and may destroy the planet's habitability.

a reply to: CriticalStinker

Im still of child baring age

and it's purely from a male in a first

Huh? please explain.

a reply to: Irishhaf

, a feeding frenzy of media on covid 19 each trying to out do the others with doom porn.

Think big picture, we are programmed to act in a certain way. These time are reminiscent of times before WW2 and post 911.
Softening us up to accept as fait accompli , starvation, chaos, war, New World Order. Who stands to benefit? Think.

originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: CriticalStinker

Im still of child baring age

and it's purely from a male in a first

Huh? please explain.

Sorry, that was confusing. I know men can always have kids but I'm 32, so I could still start a family....is what I meant.

a reply to: CriticalStinker

cool

a reply to: Alicat12

Mexico

originally posted by: TheGreatReset
The BBC and Channel 4 both ran very short segments on "population decline" in recent months also. By chance I happened to catch both segments (as I don't usually watch TV), they both prophesised our global populations will be decimated by 2100, the offered no explanation other than declining birth rates and each were subtitled "New World Order".

I kid you not.

Interesting.

They call it television 'programming'.
When they are all telling us the same thing, what does that leave us to think about the 'program' ?

Has everyone received their dose of 'programming' today ?

originally posted by: Metallicus
The problem is that more intelligent humans have less children. Sadly, dumbasses are much more prolific at reproduction than smarter people.

Mrs. Gonzalez !!
Welcome to the show !
Please tell us how many children you have, and what your husband does for a living ?

I have a 19 children.
My husband operates an automatic screwing-machine.

( 5 bonus points for anyone remembering the origin of that old '60's joke. )