It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Agit8dChop
And if irregularities are found, will you back further checks/audits?
I mean.. we all want legitimate elections right?
originally posted by: wheresthebody
Hats off to who ever is trolling the alt-right meatheads with this nonsense, it's keeping me entertained.
originally posted by: wheresthebody
pffft, space isn't even real man
originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: glen200376
India is in Asia in case you didn't know.
What the feck are you on about you knob ? Where did i say India is not in Asia ?
Go read it again, i said CURRY is not an ASIAN word. The word was given by The British.
Go back to sleep.
originally posted by: 1947boomer
originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: Lucidparadox
That would mean upwards of 15 million people registered to vote, a 10 million+ increase from any other election year. That's up to you whether you believe it or not, but I'm not buying it.
According to the US Census Bureau data, a total of 154,628,000 people voted in 2020. Looking at the total number of votes cast in 2020, the number is 158,383,403. When you look at that and think about all the witnesses who gave written affidavits and people who registered their dogs under the name of college girls and boys, your argument flies right out of the window.
You need to go back and look at the census data. The census attempts to inventory every person in the country; only a fraction of the total population actually votes. That means that many more people respond to the census than vote. It turns out that about 36 million people who responded to the census declined to answer the question of whether they voted or not. Surely you can understand that 4 million of those 36 million people who declined to answer the question actually voted?
originally posted by: LSU2018
originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: glen200376
India is in Asia in case you didn't know.
What the feck are you on about you knob ? Where did i say India is not in Asia ?
Go read it again, i said CURRY is not an ASIAN word. The word was given by The British.
Go back to sleep.
Knob?
Anyways, what you said is that curry isn't an Asian dish.
Why ‘Curry’ is not Indian The word ‘Curry’ commonly refers to a dish prepared with spices originating from India. However, the word has no real meaning in authentic South Asian cuisine and can be classed as a term historically introduced by the British.
originally posted by: LSU2018
I've gotten something about digging into the analyzations and how I'd have to do it myself (to prove they're the ones who are wrong), so maybe you can prove to me that I'm the one who is wrong here.
originally posted by: Human2Spirit
originally posted by: Human2Spirit
Pieces of bamboo will expose the Chicom plot to rig the election. This calls for a song!
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: LSU2018
The data is usually off by a few hundred thousand to a million. Not more than 4 million.
Wrong. The 2000 election had the Census claiming only 111,000,000 voted when it was 129,000,000.
originally posted by: alldaylong
originally posted by: LSU2018
originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: glen200376
India is in Asia in case you didn't know.
What the feck are you on about you knob ? Where did i say India is not in Asia ?
Go read it again, i said CURRY is not an ASIAN word. The word was given by The British.
Go back to sleep.
Knob?
Anyways, what you said is that curry isn't an Asian dish.
And you think it is ?
Why ‘Curry’ is not Indian The word ‘Curry’ commonly refers to a dish prepared with spices originating from India. However, the word has no real meaning in authentic South Asian cuisine and can be classed as a term historically introduced by the British.
www.desiblitz.com...
Educate yourself.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: LSU2018
I've gotten something about digging into the analyzations and how I'd have to do it myself (to prove they're the ones who are wrong), so maybe you can prove to me that I'm the one who is wrong here.
Here's a whole pile of data going back to the 1960's.
originally posted by: Rob420
Wow you can not be this stupid how many audits us this now? And what has been found? Not one shred of these outlandish claims.but I have seen a few trump supporters arrested for fraud like a guy voting for his dead mother etc
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: LSU2018
It all boils down to there are errors in the reporting throughout the channel so you cannot say, 'This proves something' other than the fact that the government is error prone in its reporting. Which should be a given to everyone.