Bamboo Fibers Found in Ballots During the Maricopa County Audit May Support Staci Burk's Claims

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: IndieA
I don't believe that...

Of course you don't, you think Pillow Man is going to save the Republic. Any day now, right?

That's a false assumption. I don't think that he is going to save the republic, but I do think that he has the same data that came from the Leonardo satellite hack, and I think he has access to the whistleblower and may have even had him on his last film "Absolute Interference".

If this and the data are real, at the very least it should wake people up to all the vulnerabilities with electronic voting machines and perhaps we can get back to having fair and honest elections. Better yet would be if we could out some of the corruption within our government and actually serve some justice, but I'll settle for voting the crooks out fairly and honestly if I have to.

Here's some info on the satellite hack and the affidavit that was sworn before a federal court in Italy.

greatgameindia.com...


Here's a little more info I found, but haven't really dug into.

greatgameindia.com...


But what I really want to share is what I remember from early January, because I was paying close attention to this stuff.

I listened to a zoom meeting between a woman who ran a voting integrity organization and a few other people she was coordinating with to get this information out. She claimed that she was contacted by the Rome whistleblower about the satellite hack. She said that at first they didn't have all the data and that this person risked their life to retrieve it and was successful. She then said, that she was able to contact Tiffany Trump about this and that Tiffany set up a meeting for her with Trump on Christmas Eve at Mar-a-Lago where she presented Trump with the evidence saying, "I've got the best Christmas present for you." So what happened after that? The Capitol raid. Which was weird in and of it's self. I was watching the votes get accepted, then Arizona objected, it was affirmed, and they went into the 2 hour debate that is suppose to take place during which 1,000 affidavits and other evidence was submitted and accepted shortly before the raid. 5 more States had said that they were going to object as well, which would have meant 12 hours of debate and a highly contested election, but instead officials got to evacuate for the day, then come back at night, roll over, and hand the election over to Biden. I apologize for the tangent.

Anyway, I'm fairly certain that Mike Lindell has the same data, because he said that he was approached with his data on January 6th after nothing was being done about it, mainly because he has a voice. Mike claims the data is from a white hat hacker or hackers. I worry that the US or the tri-state (Washington DC, The City of London, and The Vatican) was involved in the satellite hack and that it was all classified at super high levels with all sorts of national security implications involved, and that this information may still never be released or accepted as real, even if it's 100% true, as many of us know how the msm is doing such a fine job of controlling popular opinion these days.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: Thenail
Who brought up Q ?

Bamboo ballots = Q.

Now you're just being dumb.

Or maybe the news told you that and you believed it.

a reply to: IndieA

Can the rest of you please try to stay on topic.

Pages 8 and 9 is nothing but bickering about census numbers and curry.

originally posted by: CrazyFox
Yawn anyone who disagrees is a Cucumber

No, anyone who ascribes to that crap is. It's really simple.

originally posted by: CrazyFox
...which shows a clear Pattern of voting irregularities ...

No, it shows that data is badly flawed.

originally posted by: IndieA
That's a false assumption. I don't think that he is going to save the republic, but I do think that he has the same data that came from the Leonardo satellite hack...

LOL, more satellites. Sure.

How'd that Frankfurt server war go?

a reply to: IndieA

No, that's a Q-cumber conspiracy.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: IndieA
That's a false assumption. I don't think that he is going to save the republic, but I do think that he has the same data that came from the Leonardo satellite hack...

LOL, more satellites. Sure.

How'd that Frankfurt server war go?

I provided links. It's up to you to either look at them or ignore them.

It sounds like you already chose ignorance.

originally posted by: IndieA
I provided links.

There's no links to satellites doing anything with voting data, it's a Q-Cumber conspiracy.

Unless that Jewish Space Laser thing was actually real. Was it? Mazel Tough!

originally posted by: LSU2018

originally posted by: 1947boomer

originally posted by: LSU2018

originally posted by: 1947boomer

originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: Lucidparadox

That would mean upwards of 15 million people registered to vote, a 10 million+ increase from any other election year. That's up to you whether you believe it or not, but I'm not buying it.

According to the US Census Bureau data, a total of 154,628,000 people voted in 2020. Looking at the total number of votes cast in 2020, the number is 158,383,403. When you look at that and think about all the witnesses who gave written affidavits and people who registered their dogs under the name of college girls and boys, your argument flies right out of the window.

You need to go back and look at the census data. The census attempts to inventory every person in the country; only a fraction of the total population actually votes. That means that many more people respond to the census than vote. It turns out that about 36 million people who responded to the census declined to answer the question of whether they voted or not. Surely you can understand that 4 million of those 36 million people who declined to answer the question actually voted?

Only a fraction of the total population is old enough to vote, so of course only a fraction vote. Look at the data, it shows the total population of people over 18, then the total population of citizens over 18, then total registered. Where do you find who responded to the census? I keep hearing it, but nobody can show it to me. I've gotten something about digging into the analyzations and how I'd have to do it myself (to prove they're the ones who are wrong), so maybe you can prove to me that I'm the one who is wrong here.

The data I'm providing is the data reported by states for those who voted and those who registered. The data you're referring to is probably on a different data table where they go by race, sex, etc., but not by total votes. US Census goes by what is reported back to them by each state so if it's not accurate then that means a district or districts across different states didn't do their job.

Here’s the link to the data table:

www2.census.gov...

Third, fourth, and fifth columns from the right side, top row, labeled “No response to voting”, “reported not voted”, and “reported voted”, respectively. About 154.6 million reported voted, 40.5 million reported not voted, and 36.4 million had no response to voting.

That's not in reference to the total votes. That's in reference to the sex and single years of age. If you reported that you didn't vote then that would mean your vote didn't count. To get the information the Census Bureau is attaining, the states report the total number of votes. The information I'm getting has nothing to do with any personal details.

Yes, the top line is the total of all responses to the question on the census form asking the respondents if they’ve voted. They’ve broken the data down by age group and gender to a high level of detail in the body of the table, but the top line numbers are the totals of all the responses to the question of “did you vote”, that includes all male and female citizens age 18 years and older (that’s all the people who would be eligible to vote). It excludes all the population under 18, which is why the total of people who either said they voted, said they didn’t vote, or declined to say whether they voted totals only about 231 million people, instead of the 331 million of the complete population.

Where do you get the idea that if you reported that you didn’t vote that means your vote didn’t count? That’s nonsense. It means you decided not to exercise your right to vote. If you don’t vote your vote can neither count nor not count because it doesn’t exist.

You seem to be confused. The states have no role whatsoever in the census. The census is run by the US Census Bureau and is organized into 4 regions (Northeast, Midwest, South, and West). The states don’t report anything to the Census Bureau.

On the other hand, the Federal government has no role in running the election and reporting the results. When the individual states count their votes, they report them to the Senate for validation, not to the Census Bureau. Furthermore, the totals have to be certified by the states, which means that the designated state officer (Governor, Attorney General, whatever) is swearing that each vote they are reporting can be traced to one or more poll workers actually tallying ballots. The census numbers are simply publishing what the census respondents said they did or didn’t do.

originally posted by: IndieA

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: IndieA
That's a false assumption. I don't think that he is going to save the republic, but I do think that he has the same data that came from the Leonardo satellite hack...

LOL, more satellites. Sure.

How'd that Frankfurt server war go?

I provided links. It's up to you to either look at them or ignore them.

It sounds like you already chose ignorance.

Well, I looked at them and it appears to be the same fictional crap that has been around since January.

Some guy is being prosecuted for a bunch of hacking he did from 2015-17 at the company he worked for - Leonardo. All the stuff about hacking the US election using satellites to break into some server in Frankfurt is just made up and just attributed to an "anonymous source". It's also incredibly vague.

It the article even makes up a lawyer for the guy called "Alfio D’Urso" whereas his attorney is actually Nicola Naponiello, who says the US election stuff is nonsense.

Also, who writes this rubbish?

Defendant stated he was working in Pescara facility of Leonardo, and utilized military grade cyber warfare encryption capabilities to transmit switched roads.

The military satellite of Fucino tower to Frankfurt, Germany period, the defending swears that the data in some cases may have been switched to represent more than total voters registered.

Switched roads? Germany period? It doesn't exactly fill you with confidence when they publish this drivel, does it?

originally posted by: FatherLukeDuke
Switched roads? Germany period? It doesn't exactly fill you with confidence when they publish this drivel, does it?

The same level of competent English I get when I order from the local Chinese take out.

And what has it got to do with this ludicrous attempt to detect bamboo?

Maybe they should be looking for traces of ragu or Chianti in the ballots?

originally posted by: FatherLukeDuke
Maybe they should be looking for traces of ragu or Chianti in the ballots?

I would personally support and offer to conduct this type of audit.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: FatherLukeDuke
Switched roads? Germany period? It doesn't exactly fill you with confidence when they publish this drivel, does it?

The same level of competent English I get when I order from the local Chinese take out.

Maybe they are also utilizing "military grade encryption"?

originally posted by: FatherLukeDuke
Maybe they are also utilizing "military grade encryption"?

Yes, the CIA Black Hats told me as much.

originally posted by: IndieA
a reply to: IndieA

Can the rest of you please try to stay on topic.

Pages 8 and 9 is nothing but bickering about census numbers and curry.

The census numbers point to the fraud in this election which ties directly into your thread.

originally posted by: alldaylong

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: IndieA

Hopefully they also use the Jew Lasers to track any ballots that don't get scanned for bamboo using the RFID watermark that's detectable from space.

Traces of polyurethane foam which is used to fill pillows, has been detected on the ballot papers.

The investigators are not sure what this may mean. Further tests are being carried out.

The evildoers pulled a few teeth and prayed for piles of ballots from the tooth fairy. She came through.

a reply to: underwerks

Underwerks.....thanks for the laughs. I wasn't aware the yakuza was still shipping their bills in Ramen. good to know

a reply to: 1947boomer

I'll admit that I didn't know they performed surveys, as I've never seen one, but that prompted me to dig further into where the USCB gets its information because I prefer researching on my own rather than getting "information" from a news site. The Census Bureau gets their data from federal, state, and local governments. Looks like we're both correct. They survey, and they get data from all government.

The Census Bureau collects data about the economy and the people living in the United States from many different sources. Some data are collected from respondents directly (including businesses), through the censuses and surveys we conduct. We also collect additional data from other sources. Primary sources for additional data are federal, state, and local governments, as well as some commercial entities. These types of data are generally called “administrative data.

The Census Bureau should be more accurate than anything else with their sources.

Source