It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Boadicea
Only because of a law written by man. Not by nature. Not by science. Not by personal autonomy.
So imaginary lines on a map are the difference between what is possible and what is not possible?
No. You stated that someone under 18 cannot consent. That is not true. She can consent regardless of the law. The girl either did so willingly of her own volition, or she did not. There is no getting around that.
Legal definitions are valid for legal purposes. Obviously, if a law is considered necessary, it is because it is possible for minors to consent!!! It's not about where she can or not. She obviously can. It's about whether or not the state will use the barrel of a gun to enforce their will on those who use their own free will to make a different choice. They can't even stop it from happening. They can only punish after the fact.
But more important, it is a subjective decision, not an objective fact,
or there would not be different legal ages of consent in different states. If the state legislates their authority over the 17-year-old's autonomy, that is a legal difference. The girl can still consent. It is the state that does not consent.
If he has broken any laws, then charge him and give him his day in court, let him be judged by a jury of his peers, and the chips will fall where they may.
But I'm not going to pretend like this is anything more than it is.
originally posted by: underwerks
I’d say the real question is if Trumps DOJ and AG knew about it, why hasn’t anything been done about it until now?
Spoken like a NAMBLA true believer.
originally posted by: CrazyWater
13 pages of slandering and theres not even any proof that this person even actually EXISTS!
On top of that there IS proof that there was an attempt to extort millions in exchange to settle.
Shouldnt that BOTHER all of you going after Gaetz? That if there WAS sex trafficking or sex with a minor theyre perfectly fine sweeping it under the rug for MONEY?!
But of course it doesnt matter to you guys, because this is just faux outrage because he has an R after his name.
You guys dont give two craps about this alleged person , if you did you would be demanding everything on Bidens Sons laptop be made available and him and Joe having the book thrown at them. Especially with the ties to sex trafficking in Ukraine and China.
originally posted by: fencesitter85
Man, there sure are a lot of you choosing the most slimy, rancid, scummy hill to die on in defending this maggot.
originally posted by: fencesitter85
Man, there sure are a lot of you choosing the most slimy, rancid, scummy hill to die on in defending this maggot.
Why has no one mentioned the more interesting part of this whole saga.
originally posted by: MiddleInsite
So let's all blame the messenger, the NYT, and say nothing about what Gaetz supposedly did. Typical for ATS. Deny ignorance, LOL!
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
originally posted by: MiddleInsite
So let's all blame the messenger, the NYT, and say nothing about what Gaetz supposedly did. Typical for ATS. Deny ignorance, LOL!
As a conservative GOP he will get zero safe cover in the news media so if anything comes up we'll know about it. The fact that we don't have much more to go on than conjecture suggests to me that this is a lame attempt at spooking or harassing him.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
originally posted by: MiddleInsite
So let's all blame the messenger, the NYT, and say nothing about what Gaetz supposedly did. Typical for ATS. Deny ignorance, LOL!
As a conservative GOP he will get zero safe cover in the news media so if anything comes up we'll know about it. The fact that we don't have much more to go on than conjecture suggests to me that this is a lame attempt at spooking or harassing him.
You hit the nail on the head. The Matt Gaetz saga was simply the media trying to conjure up a story to distract from the DUD President that Joe Biden is proving to be.
No. You stated that someone under 18 cannot consent. That is not true. She can consent regardless of the law.
Wow.
I really didn’t expect any right wingers here...
...to use the excuse that a minor can consent to having sex.
It seems there isn’t anything you guys wouldn’t support if it meant protecting a right wing politician. Even a 38 year old man having sex with an underaged girl.
Not an excuse for anything. Just the plain truth in simple terms that anyone can understand. Because there is a very big difference -- literal and moral -- between consent and force. A very important difference. A legal difference.
Prove me wrong.... Condemn Hunter Biden and everyone who has protected him. Right here and right now.
Nope. A minor can’t legally consent.
That’s the law.
You have a completely warped understanding of age of consent.
And frankly, it’s sickening.