It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A Chinese professor claims that the Egyptian pyramids, the Parthenon, and other remnants of ancient civilizations in the West, were all faked by Western scholars in order to fabricate an ancient history, and diminish the glory of China.
First someone invents the Homeric epics the Illiad and the Odyssey (and all their derivate works like the Aeneid and the Divine Comedy), then invents the ruins of Troy AND then let someone like Schliemann start digging – ALL in some few years with the purpose of degrading China. Without anyone in the European cultural elite objecting to this? Sure.
That Huang Heqing grew up during the Cultural Revolution, where those that couldn’t doublethink were executed, explains a lot of his “reasoning”.
It said the Chinese authorities demanded that certain words, including “Genghis Khan,” “Empire” and “Mongol” be taken out of the show. Subsequently, it said that they asked for power over exhibition brochures, legends and maps.
originally posted by: LABTECH767
a reply to: rickymouse
It has been said that even the Chinese communists fear the wrath of the spirits of the past, that they fear to Excavate Emperor Qin's tomb for example despite the fact it definitely will contain huge amounts of treasure, that tomb is also a pyramid but despite being far younger than the likes of the ancient white pyramid and despite the white pyramid having been trashed by a later large tomb being dug into it's side to house an influential general the pyramid of Qin is bow sided and looks far more like a hill than does the ancient white pyramid that may be many thousands of years older indicating that not only did an unknown previous civilization in China build bigger they built better, many pyramids though were definitely built both by and during the seven kingdoms period and some even into early Chinese dynastic periods but none of these come close to the more mysterious giant's like the great white pyramid - so called because at least one side used to have huge white stone slabs while the other three supposedly had slabs of different colours.
Another reason is that they do not want evidence proving they are not the original inhabitant's and perhaps there civilization was not originally founded by people that looked like they do today to come to light as it would be a shock to there self identity and national pride.
originally posted by: LABTECH767
It once had a glittering giant gem on top and it's sides shone white in the sun until the communists and there cultural revolution when it was destroyed, it is still there but not recognizable to accounts of it even from the 1940's when western pilot's reported seeing it.
originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: Asktheanimals
"Western" And Eurocentric history is a bit of a touchy subject, but it has taken the right steps to correct it's faults. Revising history can be conducted in a responsible, peer reviewed, and archaeological way, but to blatantly call the the great pyramids of Giza (and this is an understatement) a rather modern fabrication? Is not only dishonest, but a blatant insult to the thousands of academics, and field archaeologists who have devoted their lives to studying such feats of human civilization.
Chinese history runs deep, and you bring up a good point, it's recognition is rather pushed aside, we can discuss Chinese history for hours, days, and it's very interesting, all the way up to the Opium wars, to the great leap forward. The stark reality is, who ever is in charge in China, is trying to build a lie.