Mike Lindell drops documentary on the 2020 election fraud providing definitive proof.

originally posted by: neutronflux
There was clear violation of rights and state lockdowns.

Was there? The Supreme Court didn't even get involved with this crap. Wake up to reality.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: neutronflux
There was clear violation of rights and state lockdowns.

Was there? The Supreme Court didn't even get involved with this crap. Wake up to reality.

I guess there was no evidence the states violated the constitution regarding the lockdowns if it never made it to the Supreme Court.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Now
Actually answer what was posted.

There was clear violation of rights and state lockdowns.

How many of those cases went to court. How many of those unconstitutional lockdown are still in effect? Those lockdown were not clear violations of the constitution and civil rights? How many criminal cases resulted from unconstitutional lockdowns that violated human rights?

originally posted by: neutronflux
I guess there was no evidence the states violated the constitution regarding the lockdowns if it never made it to the Supreme Court.

That has nothing to do with voter fraud, brohan, like I said, you're all over the place.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: neutronflux
I guess there was no evidence the states violated the constitution regarding the lockdowns if it never made it to the Supreme Court.

That has nothing to do with voter fraud, brohan, like I said, you're all over the place.

It does have to do with trying to validate that because a court will not review the evidence, there is no evidence.

Now. Answer the these questions if a court will not see a case equates to “no evidence”

There was clear violation of rights and state lockdowns.

How many of those cases went to court. How many of those unconstitutional lockdown are still in effect? Those lockdown were not clear violations of the constitution and civil rights? How many criminal cases resulted from unconstitutional lockdowns that violated human rights?

originally posted by: neutronflux
It does have to do with trying to validate that because a court will not review the evidence, there is no evidence.

Maybe to you it validates it but in the real world it's not related.

Now. Answer the these questions...

No. I told you I don't answer any of your questions.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: neutronflux
It does have to do with trying to validate that because a court will not review the evidence, there is no evidence.

Maybe to you it validates it but in the real world it's not related.

Now. Answer the these questions...

No. I told you I don't answer any of your questions.

A childish way to not self incriminate your wrong.

Sorry to make you actually think.

a reply to: neutronflux

No, I'm just not interested in your stream of consciousness, tangential, strawman, non sequitur, multi post replies.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: neutronflux

No, I'm just not interested in your stream of consciousness, tangential, strawman, non sequitur, multi post replies.

I am AugustusMasonicus and cannot be inconvenienced by actual facts, judges are swayed by politics, and will use false authority to make a BS excuse to not engage in debate.

Good luck to you and obviously supporting lockdowns now Trump is not in office.

a reply to: neutronflux

Here are the facts:

• Mike Lindell is a hack
  
• He presented nothing to an official party or person that could use his 'evidence'
  
• Their was no widespread voter fraud
  
• Trump lost because he turned into Hillary circa 2016

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

I think that is VERY unfair to Hillary.

a reply to: jtma508

Well, it is the one thing these people can't wrap their heads around since they are far to involved in partisan team play to recognize reality.

now it's a matter of time til Mike LIndell is put on a "suicide watch".

originally posted by: mikeone718
now it's a matter of time til Mike LIndell is put on a "suicide watch".

Why? You think he's gonna kill himself over shame?

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

sure, it's what the idiot box will claim

originally posted by: mikeone718
sure, it's what the idiot box will claim

Pillow Man isn't going to kill himself, just his business and earnings by running his mouth.

Riddle me this. If the government decided to confiscate all guns and ammunition and no court would touch it would that make it legal?

a reply to: iwanttobelieve70

That's called a false equivalence.

a reply to: jidnum

You guys live in bazzaro world but I promise you reality isn’t that bad. You should really give it a try

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: neutronflux

Everyone is in on it except Pillow Guy. Just like they are with how we didn't get to the moon and when holographic nano thermite took down the Twin Towers.

Yup, it's a grand conspiracy to take down Trump.

Do you visit Earth often?