It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: vonclod
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: fworkman
The video indicates hard evidence of foreign interference.
Hard evidence is not a video, it's physical tangible evidence, that can be scrutinised.
A page or two back, a poster claiming a shot of a van, with boxes in it..is evidence..NO, NO ITS NOT!!
Certainly it IS. The FBI and law enforcement convict criminals EVERY DAY based upon video evidence of all kinds of crimes.
Your lies are quite poor in quality.
Ok, you go with that..let me guess, Kraken go boom next week..I would offer a wager, but ATS members always welch on bets
originally posted by: ventian
Posted the link to the website on my FB feed. They told me before posting it that a disclaimer would precede it.
The warning says "this video may contain sexually explicit or partial nudity".
Make of that what you will.
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: vonclod
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: fworkman
The video indicates hard evidence of foreign interference.
Hard evidence is not a video, it's physical tangible evidence, that can be scrutinised.
A page or two back, a poster claiming a shot of a van, with boxes in it..is evidence..NO, NO ITS NOT!!
Certainly it IS. The FBI and law enforcement convict criminals EVERY DAY based upon video evidence of all kinds of crimes.
Your lies are quite poor in quality.
Ok, you go with that..let me guess, Kraken go boom next week..I would offer a wager, but ATS members always welch on bets
Even easier, call some district court judges or something for yourself and ask them if video evidence presented by state prosecutors gets criminal convictions.
What a concept in learning through a more scientific approach rather than emotions and wishful thinking.
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
a reply to: vonclod
You can't even acknowledge the fact that video evidence is in fact evidence and gets convictions. Move the goalposts, deflect away, lie to yourself, resort to ridicule, etc.. Pathetic.
You have been exposed publicly now, no matter what you say in the future.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: Bloodworth
So the judges that were appointed by Trump that shot down his cases are Never Trumpers?
originally posted by: Xtrozero
I'm just glad someone is out there telling me what is real or not. You know I need that in my life to have this great over watch to protect me from all that false information. I trust in their perfection and wisdom to never lead me down the wrong path. I do not know what I would become or what my actions would be without this tremendous service that is offered.
originally posted by: fworkman
a reply to: vonclod
I stand corrected. You are correct the video is not hard evidence. I guess the data collected is potential evidence that should be turned over to an official law enforcement agency to investigate.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
Anyone else surprised at the rate that Lindell's video is being censored so quickly across social media platforms?
There is absolutely NOTHING objectionable in the presentation...EXCEPT that it presents evidence which goes against the narrative that the election was all hunky-dory.
This is censorship and fascism in action.
Does anyone on the Left care to agree with me?
originally posted by: kykweer
I wish we could see a similar analysis of states that Trump won.
originally posted by: fworkman
a reply to: vonclod
I stand corrected. You are correct the video is not hard evidence. I guess the data collected is potential evidence that should be turned over to an official law enforcement agency to investigate.
I hope it really being investigated. Why would someone make this claim if it were not true? It seems to me it would be an awful lot of trouble and an author putting her reputation at risk if not true.