Playing Politics with our lives- 440,000 deaths later and now a reversal on HCQ

Could shutdowns been avoided completely with 80% fewer hospitalizations? All b/c orange man bad?

From thegat ewaypundit

After 440,000 Americans are Dead – Facebook and American Journal of Medicine Admit Their Stand on HCQ was Wrong — These People Should be Prosecuted!

American Journal of Medicine article

From the c19study.com on 1/24

• There is evidence of bias towards publishing negative results. 88% of prospective studies report positive effects, and only 75% of retrospective studies do.
• Studies from North America are 4.0 times more likely to report negative results than studies from the rest of the world combined, p = 0.00000005.

Zalenko has been using HCQ from the beginning, his peer reviewed trial showing 80%+ improvement.

I dont think prosecution is in order, BUT with all the supposed fact checking going on, how was this missed? With peoples lives on the line, should Facebook and Twitter really be censoring this information? Why not just flag it as unproven? From Facebook

The Board observed that, in this post, the user was opposing a governmental policy and aimed to change that policy. The combination of medicines that the post claims constitute a cure are not available without a prescription in France and the content does not encourage people to buy or take drugs without a prescription.

From Zalenko.

Dr. Zelenko contends that President Trump’s early promotion of HCQ turned it into a political battle because his numerous enemies did not want to see him with an easy “win.” “My own treatment of patients within high-risk groups, along with independent research, have shown that hospitalizations can be reduced by 84% by using protocols that involve both HCQ and Zinc,” Zelenko states.

If this is true it definitely takes the cake. I mean the depths at which so many have sunk just to keep Trump from pulling a second term is absolutely beyond disgusting. Tanking the economy and shutting whole states down is bad enough but to ignore something that may well have saved numerous lives is on a whole other level.

It wasn't missed either. It was deliberately ignored for nefarious purposes. There were quite a few doctors that came out and said that it was working for their patients. Patients came out and said that they believe this combination of drugs saved their lives. Each time they were shut down by Fauci and others and it has to cross one's mind that it was done simply because at the start this is the therapy Trump mentioned.

I guess we'll see where this goes from here.

a reply to: 111DPKING111


Dirty politicians like those in the swamp do not care about how many have to die as long as they had fuel to pursue their agendas, all of them will go blameless because the end result was on their favor.

All this was no about finding treatments but to push an agenda GMO vaccine on as many people as they can.

a reply to: Kangaruex4Ewe

It won't go anywhere...

We've literally been pointing out all this stuff since March of last year. This is all going according to their plan. They will subtlety change things and there will be a miraculous improvement in Covid cases / deaths. Biden takes credit. The MSM continues to bury these types of stories. The sheeple keep on bah-bah Orange Man bad....

They simply cannot connect the dots even when it is laid out right in front of their eyes.

It is far easier to fool people than to convince someone they've been fooled....

a reply to: 111DPKING111
Democrat leaders and MSM are surrounding themselves with security 24/7, because they know they destroyed millions of families in 2020, all in the name of getting the Swamp-Drainer out of the White House.

Americans will rebel...the only unknown is WHEN it will happen.

But But Fauci Sez ..... for anyone playing the 2021 version of Simon Sez ya should pay attention ...







These 12 Graphs Show Mask Mandates Do Nothing To Stop COVID

History does not bode well for times that politics meddles with science. Martin Kulldorff, a professor at Harvard Medical School and a leader in disease surveillance methods and infectious disease outbreaks, describes the current COVID scientific environment this way: “After 300 years, the Age of Enlightenment has ended.”

In the end, it will be the loss of credibility in our scientific institutions, and the unnecessary division they have sowed among us, for which masks will be remembered.

There should be prosecutions

a reply to: 111DPKING111

Oxford University came to the same conclusion 6 months ago.

No clinical benefit from use of hydroxychloroquine in hospitalised patients with COVID-19

www.recoverytrial.net... loroquine-5-june-2020-no-clinical-benefit-from-use-of-hydroxychloroquine-in-hospitalised-patients-with-covid-19

a reply to: 111DPKING111

'TRUST THE SCIENCE!!!'

...but only the parts we like.

The american journal of medicine has not said their stance of HCQ was wrong.

I would suggest gateway pundit is not perhaps the most reliable source for medical advice .

a reply to: ScepticScot

Who can you trust, this days, hard to find reliable sources now a days, Dr. Saucy Fauci, the CDC or big pharma, is hard to believe when agendas seems to be behind all of the above.

Why are top democratic officials afraid?

They won fair and square? Why the need to merc people?

Where's Joe on the unity? Why hasn't he taken the reins on his rabid cult?

From one side of the aisle to the other, unfortunately the cheaters like to punish those who know the truth.

It’s a crime against humanity

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: ScepticScot

Who can you trust, this days, hard to find reliable sources now a days, Dr. Saucy Fauci, the CDC or big pharma, is hard to believe when agendas seems to be behind all of the above.

I think trusting actual scientific studies and medical experts is,on balance, better than trusting the gateway pundit.

a reply to: Nivhk

Seems like the reins are on Joe and the rabid cult are the ones in charge.

a reply to: ScepticScot

Yes, scientist are great, but now when the funding for the programs comes also from bias sources trying to push their own agendas with the backing of scientist you can not trust.

That is another issue behind scientist, I like to read what independent studies say about issues, but many of this work is dismiss because it does not align with the status quo.

a reply to: 111DPKING111

While I don’t disagree with the assertion that HCQ was the target of a media smear campaign that would undermine Trump’s approval ratings, I have to say if you believe that was main objective you have failed to see the bigger picture. Yes, the disinformation campaign was intended to contradict Trump, but the real motive for the HCQ propaganda was much more sinister. Many honest and professional doctors lost their jobs because they prescribed HCQ to their patients with Covid. Pharmacies were prevented from filling prescriptions for HCQ when it was prescribed for covid. The CCP, Deep State, and Pharma corporations succeeded in withholding the most practical and inexpensive treatment for Covid from those who needed it. Meanwhile, the pharmaceutical companies were rushing to produce their “vaccines” knowing that an effective cure that already existed wasn’t going to interfere with profits.

1. Many people whom were at risk were denied HCQ and eventually lost their lives.
2. Pharmaceutical companies were able to push their vaccines, as well as earlier treatments like Remdesivir, onto a market that was clearly manipulated to their favor.
3. Trump was robbed of his validation and what would be his inevitable success for accurately promoting a proven safe treatment.

To me, the biggest crimes committed were not by the media (although they most definitely are criminals) but instead by the insurance companies that were able to get doctors fired and prevent pharmacies from filling prescriptions. Everyone knew how obviously illegal this was when it happened, and yet it has taken this long for the truth to be told.

☟☟☟☟☟☟☟☟☟☟☟☟☟☟☟☟

originally posted by: Edumakated
This is all going according to their plan.

☝☝☝☝☝☝☝☝☝☝☝☝☝☝☝☝

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: ScepticScot

Yes, scientist are great, but now when the funding for the programs comes also from bias sources trying to push their own agendas with the backing of scientist you can not trust.

That is another issue behind scientist, I like to read what independent studies say about issues, but many of this work is dismiss because it does not align with the status quo.

A healthy scepticism about the funding of studies is a good thing.

Proper medical studies publish data, explain methodology nd declare conflicts of interest

The gateway pundit outright lies

Still on balance going to trust the scientists ...

a reply to: ScepticScot

Scientist problems with their funded data is not new is been going around for a long, long time, the same way that DCD is not really a government entity and the FDA primary funding for drugs reviews comes from Drugs companies.

Can we trust this agencies, hell no.

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: ScepticScot

Scientist problems with their funded data is not new is been going around for a long, long time, the same way that DCD is not really a government entity and the FDA primary funding for drugs reviews comes from Drugs companies.

Can we trust this agencies, hell no.

The FDA charges user fees to get drug approvals done. That isn't really the same thing

There is absolutely issues with how medical research is funded and conducted. However that doesn't mean that the research should be discounted and we should believe the gateway pundit or similar instead.