Biden’s transition team concerned about “abrupt halt” in cooperation with the DOD

a reply to: carewemust

DJT was considering a $2000 stimulus proposal for the COVID relief bill.
Average renter that is behind in their rent owes over $6500 but if they were back to work again then the $2000 could be used for first and last deposits on a new rental. That would still leave the $6500 to be dealt with somehow.
DJT subsequently received a briefing perhaps from the Pentagon and he dropped the idea.
So it is possible the Pentagon still has a role for Donald to play as an insider before January 21st.
Could see a DOD Chess GM calling the shots till January, but DJT "crossing the Rubicon" seriously?

a reply to: ketsuko

Biden isn't in the best of health mentally. So that may yet happen and they'll stick us with Comma-LA.

Hes a dead man walking. They want to change him to Kamala

a reply to: Phage

Hum.... I think the narrative of the Mainstream Media is very slowly starting to Shift....

Nobody likes to back the losing team

a reply to: putnam6

The Pentagon balked at handing the nuclear launch codes over to the Chinese at Usurper Joe's request.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Mark08

Because obstruction by the current administration?

You lie, like always. It isn't obstruction... As it isn't obstruction that PRESIDENT Trump wanted to change the foreign policy with countries like Ukraine, but former OBAMA and BIDEN officials like Vindman, and the former Ukrainian ambassador decided to continue the policies of Obama/Biden, and then your socialist overlords decided to use this to try to impeach the POTUS for what his job description says he CAN DO...

No, the transition was halted because there is plenty of evidence that the Bidens are corrupt and are being paid by China...

Remember those lies that "Trump is getting paid by Russia, hence he is working for them" yet it was a LIE your socialist overlords made up?.. Mueller and his team of pro-Clinton/pro-Biden democrats/socialists perused millions of documents about President Trump, his businesses and even his tax returns... As well as interviewing hundreds of people close to Trump. Yet they found NOTHING, not even ONE payment from the Russian government to Trump, or ANY collusion...

But now that your main overlord this time around has been found to have been paid by China, you want to claim "Trump is obstructing the current admin..."

You also forget that there are still several lawsuits in place, and despite your lies and attempts at denying it there is ample evidence your overlords stole the elections yet you don't care that your side used voter fraud to win.

What's even more ironic to me is that now that your left-wing leaders have openly embraced socialism yet still you support them... I remember a time when ATS members like you kept claiming that you are not socialists, or communists... But liars are caught faster than a man with a limp.

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

obstruct
to try to stop something from happening or developing:
dictionary.cambridge.org...

It seems that the DOD has stopped something from happening.

So why doesn't the DOD like Joe Biden?


I've been in the process of moving and haven't been keeping up with the latest palace intrigue.

a reply to: DanDanDat

I would say it has more to do with the new guy who is in charge of it than the DOD in general. That "acting" guy.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: DanDanDat

I would say it has more to do with the new guy who is in charge of it than the DOD in general. That "acting" guy.

Oh that's a relief than; if it's just the actions of one unscrupulous man than it should be easy for those with more integrity at the DOD to fix this issue right up.

a reply to: DanDanDat

That would be good.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: DanDanDat

That would be good.

Why hasn't it happened already?

a reply to: DanDanDat

Maybe it has.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: DanDanDat

Maybe it has.

Lots of chatter for something that might not be an issue.

a reply to: DanDanDat

Or could be of large import.

I think the DOD has a lot of information that needs to be passed on. I think any interruption in that flow is not good.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: DanDanDat

Or could be of large import.

I think the DOD has a lot of information that needs to be passed on. I think any interruption in that flow is not good.

Then everyone at the DOD (save the one acting guy) ought to be claiming to pass on information to the Biden administration; they know better than you or I how important that information flow is.

a reply to: DanDanDat

Then everyone at the DOD (save the one acting guy) ought to be claiming to pass on information to the Biden administration;

I don't think that's the way a chain of command works.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: DanDanDat

Then everyone at the DOD (save the one acting guy) ought to be claiming to pass on information to the Biden administration;

I don't think that's the way a chain of command works.

Chain of command is more important than confronting domestic enemies?

originally posted by: DanDanDat

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: DanDanDat

Then everyone at the DOD (save the one acting guy) ought to be claiming to pass on information to the Biden administration;

I don't think that's the way a chain of command works.

Chain of command is more important than confronting domestic enemies?

Yes. I've never been in the military (beyond high school ROTC) but I understand the concept.
There are provisions for whistleblowers, but yes.

I wouldn't allow a Chinese operative in government either. This is the absolute least they need to do with Biden. Time to dismantle everything he and his family has done in the last 15 years.

originally posted by: Phage

originally posted by: DanDanDat

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: DanDanDat

Then everyone at the DOD (save the one acting guy) ought to be claiming to pass on information to the Biden administration;

I don't think that's the way a chain of command works.

Chain of command is more important than confronting domestic enemies?

Yes. I've never been in the military (beyond high school ROTC) but I understand the concept.
There are provisions for whistleblowers, but yes.

We are not exaxtly talking about new recruits here. I find it hard to believe that top brass would act in a way they know to be unscrupulous and dangerous just because they have a overriding obligation to follow the orders of some acting guy.