GA governor calls for signature audit

a reply to: Thenail

There is an afterlife. But it’s just like ATS on fluoxetine and alprazolam.
No need to rush to get there. It’s over rated just like everything else 😂

originally posted by: Drucifer

My current position on all this craziness is that I’m just waiting to see what rolls out in court. Before I believe any conspiracy theory, I’ll divert to Occam’s Razor simply because I have nothing within my power to prove anything

My Occam's Razor tells me that if you create a political voting process where the rules are in flux weeks before the event takes place; stand the process on its head during a pandemic; alow for all sorts of new and unfamiliar ways to vote; remove some of the safe guards in place to secure the vote; have period of years of ratcheting up tensions between political tribes; use partisan court rulings to disenfranchise entire political parties in key swing states; the most plausible and simplest outcome is that more people than normal are going to try to take advantage of the election process.

a reply to: DanDanDat

Absentee voting has been the law in Georgia for decades.

The vote in Georgia has been secured, certified, recounted and audited repeatedly at this point.

/shrug

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: DanDanDat

Absentee voting has been the law in Georgia for decades.

Even unrequested absentee ballots ? 😃

originally posted by: DanDanDat

originally posted by: Drucifer

My current position on all this craziness is that I’m just waiting to see what rolls out in court. Before I believe any conspiracy theory, I’ll divert to Occam’s Razor simply because I have nothing within my power to prove anything

My Occam's Razor tells me that if you create a political voting process where the rules are in flux weeks before the event takes place; stand the process on its head during a pandemic; alow for all sorts of new and unfamiliar ways to vote; remove some of the safe guards in place to secure the vote; have period of years of ratcheting up tensions between political tribes; use partisan court rulings to disenfranchise entire political parties in key swing states; the most plausible and simplest outcome is that more people than normal are going to try to take advantage of the election process.

Maybe if Republicans weren't continuously trying to disenfranchise voters through various methods -- the Dems wouldn't need to fight to make sure everyone gets their votes in.

originally posted by: DanDanDat

originally posted by: Drucifer

My current position on all this craziness is that I’m just waiting to see what rolls out in court. Before I believe any conspiracy theory, I’ll divert to Occam’s Razor simply because I have nothing within my power to prove anything

My Occam's Razor tells me that if you create a political voting process where the rules are in flux weeks before the event takes place; stand the process on its head during a pandemic; alow for all sorts of new and unfamiliar ways to vote; remove some of the safe guards in place to secure the vote; have period of years of ratcheting up tensions between political tribes; use partisan court rulings to disenfranchise entire political parties in key swing states; the most plausible and simplest outcome is that more people than normal are going to try to take advantage of the election process.

I certainly don’t disagree with that. I just have zero way of doing a damn thing about finding the truth of the matter.

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: DanDanDat

Absentee voting has been the law in Georgia for decades.

Even unrequested absentee ballots ? 😃

Nope. That's why we've had an election, a recount and an audit of results.

Still came out the same way. Go figure.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: DanDanDat

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: DanDanDat
So which political hacktivities is going to preempt the CNN live feed of Joe Biden's inauguration speech with this video of Democrats cheating the 2020 elections?

306-16=290

290>270

So its not cheating when you cheat but didn't need to in order to win?

Listen I'm more of a moral relatives than an absolutist; but cheating in one state during a presidential election when you didn't need to is still not a good thing.

It's not cheating because Trump supporters have an emotional reaction to a video when the courts have dismissed the case including the assertion via affidavit and the Secretary of State has investigated the matter directly and found that no laws or regulations were broken.

We call that the rule-of-law.

You must admit that has not been the mantra of the Trump anti supportesr the last four years. With for example their emotional reaction over a debate joke involving Russian collision that lead to special council investigating the matter directly and finding no evidence that their was a coordinated effort between the Russians and the Trump campaign. And yet to this day a large percentage of these people still believe the collision narrative.

This election will be remembered as being stolen by the new president by a significant percentage of the American people, close to half I'm afraid, and it will be "proof" like this video that will fule the narrative. That is the goal here and its working.

a reply to: DanDanDat

We will see.

A significant percentage of the American people believe that Bush stole the 2000 election and the Electoral College should be abolished.

That hasn't made a lot of difference, except for punditry.

I do agree with you that there will be blood.

a reply to: Gnawledge

I'm confused at your position here. Are you against looking at illegalities?

If fraud is found, it's fraud. If none is found, it's no fraud. How can any American be against a fair election process?

originally posted by: DanDanDat

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: DanDanDat

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: DanDanDat
So which political hacktivities is going to preempt the CNN live feed of Joe Biden's inauguration speech with this video of Democrats cheating the 2020 elections?

306-16=290

290>270

So its not cheating when you cheat but didn't need to in order to win?

Listen I'm more of a moral relatives than an absolutist; but cheating in one state during a presidential election when you didn't need to is still not a good thing.

It's not cheating because Trump supporters have an emotional reaction to a video when the courts have dismissed the case including the assertion via affidavit and the Secretary of State has investigated the matter directly and found that no laws or regulations were broken.

We call that the rule-of-law.

You must admit that has not been the mantra of the Trump anti supportesr the last four years. With for example their emotional reaction over a debate joke involving Russian collision that lead to special council investigating the matter directly and finding no evidence that their was a coordinated effort between the Russians and the Trump campaign. And yet to this day a large percentage of these people still believe the collision narrative.

This election will be remembered as being stolen by the new president by a significant percentage of the American people, close to half I'm afraid, and it will be "proof" like this video that will fule the narrative. That is the goal here and its working.

The scary thing is they don't even realise they are allowing themselves to fall for the plan.

If you don't see the red flag between a 6.4% reject rate on 130,000 Georgia absentee ballots in 2016 to a 0.2% rejection rate on ten times as many Georgia absentee ballots in 2020.

We are supposed to believe the science and forget the math.

BTW the way the ballots they were scanning late into the night were absentee ballots.

If people were there as the SOS asserting this morning THEN find the Republican monitor that says that is true unless they are going to say the Republican from the SOS office was there.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: carewemust

And almost every other swing state. Democrats claim it's just a coincidence but those who can research and think for themselves know better.

Yep. All any "normal" person has to do is look at the election statistics on Joe Biden's "win".

In Milwaukee, Detroit, Philadelphia and Atlanta, he won with higher percentage of votes than Fidel Castro did in Cuba...Kim Jung-Un did in North Korea...and the Ayatolah did in Iran.

Joe Biden got 98.6% of the vote in some urban areas. That's better than Communist dictators can muster, lol.

Nothin' to see here. Just the most popular presidential candidate in the history of evar happens to be the one candidate who chose aVP who couldn't muster 2% of the votes and had her only shining moment when she insinuated he was a racist and sexually assaulted women, couldn't pull more than 30 people - pre-coronavirus - to a rally, pulled 6 to a rally during coronavirus, hid out in a basement for 8 months to present time, can't stand for periods over 10 minutes, can't speak like a sane person, etc. But yeah, most popular ever...

a reply to: LSU2018

The problem is, you have it backward, it wasn't that Biden was the most popular Presidential candidate ever, people weren't voting for him, it was that Trump is the most divisive president ever and people were voting against him. Much like they voted against Hillary in 2016.

Any other candidate would have beat Trump.

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: carewemust
IMO: If a significant number of ballots have been "lost", there will likely be an election do-over.

For the down ballot elections, sure, and that absolutely should happen, and that should be done instead of the Senate run-offs, and it should be done by paper ballots. The Chinese owned machines need to be scrapped for metal value.

But not for POTUS. The only option there is for the State Legislature to invalidate the Presidential results and appoint a new slate of electors.

President Trump predicted all of this in July/Aug/Sept/Oct. Attorney General Barr actually rendered CNN's Wuf Blister speechless in October, when describing how ripe for cheating mailed-in ballots are.

a reply to: LSU2018
It's obvious from two of two Biden's fall "speeches" that he knew he was going to win the election, regardless of what he did or didn't do, before election day.

People are going to be startled and angry when they learn how CoronaVirus was made worse, to help ensure a Biden victory. There were several things used against us in the battle. Not just mailed votes and Dominion systems.

a reply to: carewemust

President Trump started stirring people up against Mail in Ballots because he was always going to fight the results and he wanted people to believe him.

So here we are...

originally posted by: djz3ro
a reply to: LSU2018

The problem is, you have it backward, .

The problem is that a European is telling an American he is backwards about his own president.

This is a fact. Everything else is an opinion.

originally posted by: carewemust
UH OH..

Remember when Governor Kemp called for an Audit to Verify Signatures, back on November 21st?

www.cbsnews.com...

Think Kemp is serious this time?

Was yesterday simply another "Request" made to his Secretary of State?

Or was he using his authority as governor to ORDER that the audit be conducted?

BIG DIFFERENCE.

Did Kemp issue an ORDER yet?

Or did he only make another REQUEST of his S.O.S.?

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DanDanDat

originally posted by: Drucifer

My current position on all this craziness is that I’m just waiting to see what rolls out in court. Before I believe any conspiracy theory, I’ll divert to Occam’s Razor simply because I have nothing within my power to prove anything

My Occam's Razor tells me that if you create a political voting process where the rules are in flux weeks before the event takes place; stand the process on its head during a pandemic; alow for all sorts of new and unfamiliar ways to vote; remove some of the safe guards in place to secure the vote; have period of years of ratcheting up tensions between political tribes; use partisan court rulings to disenfranchise entire political parties in key swing states; the most plausible and simplest outcome is that more people than normal are going to try to take advantage of the election process.

Maybe if Republicans weren't continuously trying to disenfranchise voters through various methods -- the Dems wouldn't need to fight to make sure everyone gets their votes in.

Disenfranchise people like liquor stores, tobacco stores, bars, nightclubs, and casinos do? Disenfranchise people like DMVs and employers do? How dare we desire fair elections where all voters are accounted for and all votes are secure when we could hold fraudulent elections like this one every 2 years. Man, your thought process couldn't be any more backwards than it currently is.

ETA: Forgot to mention.... Voting is f*cking privilege just like driving, holding a job, gambling, smoking, drinking, and hanging out in a bar.