It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: carewemust
Another big election lawsuit filed in Georgia today. With Donald Trump and a citizen of Georgia as the plaintiffs.
Lots of evidence of election law violations included.
Source: mobile.twitter.com...
originally posted by: djz3ro
originally posted by: 0bserver1
a reply to: djz3ro
But clearly, this video shows Facts, don't they? And if they reject this in court then they're blind and not willing to see.
If there was nothing to succeed in court for then Rudi Guiliani and Sydney Powell would have quit or given advice to President Trump to stop this?
What facts do the videos show exactly?
They don't show people being told to go home.
They don't show anything to suggest these ballots were fraudulent.
They don't show Republican observers being shut out?
So what evidence can be gleaned from them in your opinion?
originally posted by: Brassmonkey
originally posted by: djz3ro
originally posted by: 0bserver1
a reply to: djz3ro
But clearly, this video shows Facts, don't they? And if they reject this in court then they're blind and not willing to see.
If there was nothing to succeed in court for then Rudi Guiliani and Sydney Powell would have quit or given advice to President Trump to stop this?
What facts do the videos show exactly?
They don't show people being told to go home.
They don't show anything to suggest these ballots were fraudulent.
They don't show Republican observers being shut out?
So what evidence can be gleaned from them in your opinion?
Georgia state Statute says that voting tabulation needs to be done in public view. The poll workers and the media were told to go home because counting of the votes was stopped for the night. Nevertheless, after everyone was told to go home voting tabulation clearly continued for 3 more hours into the night without any supervision and not
Within public view. I am not saying any fraud happend. I can’t prove that. What I can prove from video evidence is state law was violated during those 3 hours making those votes tabulated during that time illegal votes whether they were from Trump or Biden.
originally posted by: Brassmonkey
originally posted by: djz3ro
originally posted by: 0bserver1
a reply to: djz3ro
But clearly, this video shows Facts, don't they? And if they reject this in court then they're blind and not willing to see.
If there was nothing to succeed in court for then Rudi Guiliani and Sydney Powell would have quit or given advice to President Trump to stop this?
What facts do the videos show exactly?
They don't show people being told to go home.
They don't show anything to suggest these ballots were fraudulent.
They don't show Republican observers being shut out?
So what evidence can be gleaned from them in your opinion?
Georgia state Statute says that voting tabulation needs to be done in public view.
originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: djz3ro
I guess they also said that joe didnt blackmail Ukraine on video as well right? Or he admitted to having the biggest fraud machine in history huh?
originally posted by: Doctor Smith
This video corroborates what witnesses in Georgia said happened at the State Farm Arena. Enjoy.
Jenna Ellis Update On The Shocking Evidence Presented To The Georgia State Senate 12/04/2020
originally posted by: Doctor Smith
a reply to: johnnylaw16
The testimony matches the video evidence. What don't you understand?
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: Doctor Smith
The ballots tabulated during that time period must be examined. It's in the interest of free & fair elections considering that having monitors who represent the other parties and nonpartisan monitors to be present is expected based on what's customary, alone. It's what the voters expect. That was a deviation and the voters dealt with enough deviations, in this election, to justify this incident.
If they are legal ballots, then it should not be a big deal to make sure other sets of eyes have seen those ballots...perhaps without any Democrats present to monitor, as a punitive measure...well, I can dream, anyway.
originally posted by: johnnylaw16
originally posted by: Doctor Smith
a reply to: johnnylaw16
The testimony matches the video evidence. What don't you understand?
What testimony? Jenna Ellis, the Trump attorney?
originally posted by: Doctor Smith
originally posted by: johnnylaw16
originally posted by: Doctor Smith
a reply to: johnnylaw16
The testimony matches the video evidence. What don't you understand?
What testimony? Jenna Ellis, the Trump attorney?
So you were in the court room? Since you keep claiming you want to see evidence. Maybe you should attend some of the hearings.
originally posted by: Doctor Smith
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: Doctor Smith
The ballots tabulated during that time period must be examined. It's in the interest of free & fair elections considering that having monitors who represent the other parties and nonpartisan monitors to be present is expected based on what's customary, alone. It's what the voters expect. That was a deviation and the voters dealt with enough deviations, in this election, to justify this incident.
If they are legal ballots, then it should not be a big deal to make sure other sets of eyes have seen those ballots...perhaps without any Democrats present to monitor, as a punitive measure...well, I can dream, anyway.
Yeah. What are the Democrats afraid of? Could it be they are afraid of something? Audit the votes. Throw out the illegal votes and Trump will win.