Rudy is a badass

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: djz3ro

So, the racist comment was removed?

The racist comment was never said in the 1st place. I never slated anyone for the country they come from or the colour of their skin. I have recieved abuse for being Scottish however.

originally posted by: Mandroid7
Jesus, Can we be serious for a minute her guys?

The real question here is the fart noises.
Did we stumble onto the very first fart conspiracy?

Seriously, listen to the video.
Did someone intentionally cut the farts into this video?

1:20 in the video first fart...hold on I'm listening to the vid.
2:30 second fart
I will figure this out. Lol
It looks like the freakin media cut farts into the video.
Wow

I watched it live last night and started cracking up when I heard them. It wasn’t added in after the fact!

Two of the Dems present at that hearing acted like complete f*cktards. The dips*t in the OP started the hearing off with trying to get Rudy to swear under oath, which is stupid because Rudy wasn’t a witness and he’s representing Trump. Little bitch put up a fight when the chairman first tried to squash it, they had to pause, discuss then vote on it.

I can’t remember the black woman’s name (I can’t remember any of their names) but every time she was given the chance to ask a question, they had to shut her up because she wanted to play stupid games. One of her questions was “Do you consider yourself and Donald Trump to be honest men?”, which wasn’t the point of the hearing. The next time she was given a chance to ask a question, she pulled out a piece of paper and said “Here’s a list of quotes from my constituents....” and was shut down again. The smug little f*ck in the OP video acted that way the entire time. The one Dem who didn’t act like a total asshole basically asked some general questions and the answers didn’t line up with his knowledge, so he basically said “Well, that’s not how I understand it, but we can’t resolve that now.”

It was a good watch. As much as I am a doubter of all this fraud, there were some compelling testimonies that, due to the context of what this is all about, I would feel more comfortable if they were investigated rather than dismissed.

The redhead woman who is a Michigan canvasser and didn’t want to certify last week, man, I can smell bullsh*t a mile away and I did not catch a whiff with her. That’s a woman who takes pride in her position and knows the in’s and out’s of what she’s doing. I don’t know if anything she has an issue with would change the election, but she can certainly tell what needs work in the system and how to achieve better results, or at least much greater transparency.

I think everyone interested in this election should watch that hearing. Like I said, I need to see more proof of these claims but at face value, I didn’t catch a whiff of BS from any of these people (I may have missed a witness or two). What I definitely did smell BS from was those two f*cking idiot Dems sitting up there putting on a show. The people who voted for those f*cks should watch that and question why the f*ck they voted for them. Nothing but wasting time and acting like children.

originally posted by: djz3ro

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation

originally posted by: djz3ro

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation

originally posted by: djz3ro

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation

originally posted by: djz3ro

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation

originally posted by: djz3ro

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
a reply to: TKDRL

Phage´s just baiting, guys. Just ignore the bait and he´ll go to the next trending thread soon. Not that he does´nt occasionally say something sensible, he often does, but this time he´s just baiting imo.

-MM

You would say that, you say things like that about anyone who doesn't share the same opinion as you.

It's tragic how offensive and abusive the Trump supporters are getting because they lost.

So many straws clutched at, so many Nothingburgers chowed on, so much REEEEEing and they are all triggered.

The is truly ATS circling the drain.

And Juliani is hilarious. Maybe in his younger days he was a hotshot lawyer but it's been a downhill slope from 9/11 just to come flying off the end of it to have his head stuck up Trump's rectum.

I don´t know if this is a joke, I´m sure it must be ( ? ) , but if not then please look in the mirror, Sir:

First you say "It's tragic how offensive and abusive the Trump supporters are getting" and a paragraph further down you get offensive and abusive yourself saying "Juliani is hilarious...his head stuck up Trump's rectum"

Are you trying to set an example by being a bad one yourself?

-MM

I'm not abusive to fellow ATS members, public figures open themselves up to criticism and abuse especially when they act like Trump and old Ghoulie.

I´m no angel myself, but you come off as being very self-righteous. It did not take me many minutes to find a post where you´re abusive to another ATS member; look, I´m sure you had your reasons but...still...self-righteous imo:

originally posted by: djz3ro
a reply to: Nivhk
...
Wtf? You're making this up as you go along. Please quote my hypocrisy and racism! I won't hold my breath.

You are dellusional!!!

Here´s a link to the above snippet for context.

-MM

You think that's abusive? I think you need thicker skin. He was being delusional. I was being accused of being racist and hypocritical. Please show me where I was?

So, me saying "Phage´s just baiting, guys." is abusive, and you saying "You are dellusional!!!" to an ATS member is not. Care to tell me just how my statement is abusive and yours is not?

-MM

Ah you thought I meant you no, I said "some Trump supporters", if I meant you, I'd have called you out on it. Please don't assume what my words mean.

You were replying to a post by me and TKDLR about Phage baiting, so perhaps it´s not that strange that I thought it was about me calling Phage out on baiting...

Link to your reply to TKDLR and myself about Phage baiting

The 1st comment was to you. Then I went on to express my concern that Trump supporters are becoming abusive around here. You're joining dots that arent there.

Then you could be a bit clearer, it´s not easy to know that someone is shifting track like that.

-MM

a reply to: putnam6

At least you think for yourself amid this stupidity.

I respect that.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: putnam6

Voting shouldn't be "efficient."

All eligible voters must be able to do so without impediment.
All votes must be accounted for. Whatever it takes.
If one has evidence that these standards have not been met, one should present their evidence to the Court.

Whoa, haven’t seen you in a while!

I was calling BS for the length of this disaster so far, but as a skeptic, I suggest you watch that hearing. I believe the claims are worth investigating at the very least. If these were all lawyers offering this information, I wouldn’t buy it as they know exactly how to lay out a case/story to sway opinion, but common citizens aren’t so crafty with that in most cases. My BS meter didn’t go off while I watched. Like I said in another post, I’m not sure if it’s enough to sway the election in some of their testimonies, but if everything they’re claiming is accurate and true, some serious work needs to be done on our processes.

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
POST REMOVED BY STAFF

Like I’ve been saying all along, I’d love to see a bunch of crooked politicians get locked up for any kind of fraud. I still need to see hard proof of this as at the end of the day, these were still just words from people. That said, at face value, they passed my personal sniff test and I do believe these things should be looked into with expediency.

And left voters should watch that hearing from yesterday to see exactly why they catch sh*t from the right. Those two dipsh*ts summed it all up each time they opened their mouths.

Research has found that eyewitness-identification testimony can be very unreliable. ... Although witnesses can often be very confident that their memory is accurate when identifying a suspect, the malleable nature of human memory and visual perception makes eyewitness testimony one of the most unreliable forms of evidence.

www.ncsc.org...

a reply to: Annee

Is that what is say about breaking the chain of evidence/ chain of custody procurers for evidence?

Why would it be different concerning civil liberties and witnessing the breaking of handling votes. And breaking the procedures for handling votes.

If an individual is serving as counsel, they don't offer testimony.

If they offer testimony, then they swear in, like every other citzen.

/shrug

a reply to: Annee

Pennsylvania whistleblower speaks out after claiming 'forensically destructive' vote canvassing procedure

1010wcsi.com... rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=pennsylvania-whistleblower-speaks-out-after-claiming-forensically-destructive-vote-canvassing-procedure

What I saw was a chain of custody in all cases that was broken,” he told the panel.

The problem is, there is no longer any real trail of what are legitimate votes in this case.

a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

Lolol, bro...just stop. That dude hitched his horse to the wrong wagon. He one inagauration away from being a has been, wanna be. He was on top of the world, post 9/11. Now his hair dye cant even stand to be near him...what a doofus. Hes a total embarrassment to his fellow new yorkers and now, america, as a whole. What a tool...

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation

originally posted by: djz3ro

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation

originally posted by: djz3ro

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation

originally posted by: djz3ro

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation

originally posted by: djz3ro

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation

originally posted by: djz3ro

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
a reply to: TKDRL

Phage´s just baiting, guys. Just ignore the bait and he´ll go to the next trending thread soon. Not that he does´nt occasionally say something sensible, he often does, but this time he´s just baiting imo.

-MM

You would say that, you say things like that about anyone who doesn't share the same opinion as you.

It's tragic how offensive and abusive the Trump supporters are getting because they lost.

So many straws clutched at, so many Nothingburgers chowed on, so much REEEEEing and they are all triggered.

The is truly ATS circling the drain.

And Juliani is hilarious. Maybe in his younger days he was a hotshot lawyer but it's been a downhill slope from 9/11 just to come flying off the end of it to have his head stuck up Trump's rectum.

I don´t know if this is a joke, I´m sure it must be ( ? ) , but if not then please look in the mirror, Sir:

First you say "It's tragic how offensive and abusive the Trump supporters are getting" and a paragraph further down you get offensive and abusive yourself saying "Juliani is hilarious...his head stuck up Trump's rectum"

Are you trying to set an example by being a bad one yourself?

-MM

I'm not abusive to fellow ATS members, public figures open themselves up to criticism and abuse especially when they act like Trump and old Ghoulie.

I´m no angel myself, but you come off as being very self-righteous. It did not take me many minutes to find a post where you´re abusive to another ATS member; look, I´m sure you had your reasons but...still...self-righteous imo:

originally posted by: djz3ro
a reply to: Nivhk
...
Wtf? You're making this up as you go along. Please quote my hypocrisy and racism! I won't hold my breath.

You are dellusional!!!

Here´s a link to the above snippet for context.

-MM

You think that's abusive? I think you need thicker skin. He was being delusional. I was being accused of being racist and hypocritical. Please show me where I was?

So, me saying "Phage´s just baiting, guys." is abusive, and you saying "You are dellusional!!!" to an ATS member is not. Care to tell me just how my statement is abusive and yours is not?

-MM

Ah you thought I meant you no, I said "some Trump supporters", if I meant you, I'd have called you out on it. Please don't assume what my words mean.

You were replying to a post by me and TKDLR about Phage baiting, so perhaps it´s not that strange that I thought it was about me calling Phage out on baiting...

Link to your reply to TKDLR and myself about Phage baiting

The 1st comment was to you. Then I went on to express my concern that Trump supporters are becoming abusive around here. You're joining dots that arent there.

Then you could be a bit clearer, it´s not easy to know that someone is shifting track like that.

-MM

Well you see, I made the point to you, then left a clear space underneath, usually denoting a change in topic.

That is not shifting track. I can't help what you took from my post.

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Annee

Pennsylvania whistleblower speaks out after claiming 'forensically destructive' vote canvassing procedure

1010wcsi.com... rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=pennsylvania-whistleblower-speaks-out-after-claiming-forensically-destructive-vote-canvassing-procedure

What I saw was a chain of custody in all cases that was broken,” he told the panel.

The problem is, there is no longer any real trail of what are legitimate votes in this case.

According to whom?