Rudy is a badass

a reply to: Allaroundyou

Prepare for a big Christmas surprise

originally posted by: visitedbythem
a reply to: Allaroundyou

Prepare for a big Christmas surprise

More Biden cabinet members being announced?

a reply to: johnnylaw16

That is a dead man walking. Shame on the DNC for using someone so far along in deadly mental disease.

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Annee

Pennsylvania whistleblower speaks out after claiming 'forensically destructive' vote canvassing procedure

1010wcsi.com... rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=pennsylvania-whistleblower-speaks-out-after-claiming-forensically-destructive-vote-canvassing-procedure

What I saw was a chain of custody in all cases that was broken,” he told the panel.

The problem is, there is no longer any real trail of what are legitimate votes in this case.

Under standard procedures there is a paper trail and (at least here in Texas) it's produced in triplicate. While officials hold two copies, each judge who ran a polling place has their own copy (Republican judges and Democrat judges.)

Those can be used to match the ballots (the Dominion system we have counted paper ballots)

The elections commissions in each state have said there's no evidence of fraud. Now... while the average citizen isn't familiar with what records are produced and what are kept, the people working those elections are. And if both the Republicans AND the Democrats certify that it was fair and correct (as they have) then there really wasn't any significant levels of error or fraud.

Yes, you can get some errors. Judges are human and make mistakes. You can, for instance, re-issue a ballot if someone's changed their minds... AND (if you're new or at a busy place) forget to document that amended ballot. So it doesn't surprise me that out of millions of votes you find a few hundred that aren't legit.

But massive fraud would mean that both the Republicans AND the Democrats were in on it and that thousands of people all agreed to the fraud.

We get poll watchers (most of whom have never worked as clerks or judges) making calls on something they know nothing about and people not connected with the elections (drivers, etc) crying foul. But if there really was massive fraud, where's the actual people who worked the sites standing up to complain?

This is NOT the Mud Pit!!!

All rules for POLITE political debate will be enforced.
Members must also Stay on Topic!!!
Trolling, And What To Do About It


Reaffirming Our Desire For Productive Political Debate (REVISED)

Is There Civilization Without Civility

You are responsible for your own posts.....those who ignore that responsibility will face mod actions.


and, as always:

Do NOT reply to this post!!

a reply to: Isurrender73

He’s an American Hero. The prosecutor that took down the mob.

I'm not saying what I personally believe about rudy's character.
Because it doesn't matter.

But I will say this.
Past accomplishments do not erase present actions.

This is true for every human on earth.

PLEASE NOTE!!!

Shill talk.

ATS does not allow directly or indirectly calling other members shills.
Such posts will be removed, and thee post will be warned.

Terms And Conditions Of Use

As always, You are responsible for your own posts.



Do NOT reply to this post.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Annee

Pennsylvania whistleblower speaks out after claiming 'forensically destructive' vote canvassing procedure

1010wcsi.com... rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=pennsylvania-whistleblower-speaks-out-after-claiming-forensically-destructive-vote-canvassing-procedure

What I saw was a chain of custody in all cases that was broken,” he told the panel.

The problem is, there is no longer any real trail of what are legitimate votes in this case.

According to whom?

Maybe you should actually follow the thread. See cited source.

I don’t know, how many signed affidavits of the vote counting procedures not being followed? The election process being trashed?

a reply to: Byrd
You

But massive fraud would mean that both the Republicans AND the Democrats were in on it and that thousands of people all agreed to the fraud.

No. It means that counting process was not lawfully observed.

Again.

Pennsylvania whistleblower speaks out after claiming 'forensically destructive' vote canvassing procedure

1010wcsi.com...

Stenstrom testified at the hearing that he had spent Election Day monitoring polling sites across the county and had been given the impression things were “well in hand” in Chester, with “10 to 20” Republican poll watchers monitoring the count.

However, he told the panel that when he arrived at the “remote” counting center at 6 p.m., he was unable to gain access for close to five hours.

a reply to: MerkabaMeditation
People neglect to compare the quality of their life, to what Rudy', Trump, etc. have attained, when being harsh on these American heros/icons. That's too bad.

a reply to: neutronflux

How many did?

In what state?

What were their claims?

Have they been presented in court?

Were they judged valid?

All you're doing is hand-waving ... "everyone knows there's massive voter fraud" and yet no one, including you, can prove it.

The effort to allege voter fraud/election issues are now 1-41 in multiple state courts.

The matter is settled for non-zealots.

originally posted by: Whodathunkdatcheese
Is the Kraken here yet?

Not a SINGLE claim made by the effort to invalidate the American electoral process has proven to be factual.

Not a single one.

originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Annee

Pennsylvania whistleblower speaks out after claiming 'forensically destructive' vote canvassing procedure

1010wcsi.com... rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=pennsylvania-whistleblower-speaks-out-after-claiming-forensically-destructive-vote-canvassing-procedure

What I saw was a chain of custody in all cases that was broken,” he told the panel.

The problem is, there is no longer any real trail of what are legitimate votes in this case.

According to whom?

Maybe you should actually follow the thread. See cited source.

I don’t know, how many signed affidavits of the vote counting procedures not being followed? The election process being trashed?

Any been presented to a judge in court?

a reply to: Annee

Yep, presented and rejected time after time.

Yet, the spurious claims continue.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Annee

Yep, presented and rejected time after time.

Yet, the spurious claims continue.

It’s real simple. Not hard to understand, at all.

“Theater isn’t evidence proven in court”

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation
People neglect to compare the quality of their life, to what Rudy', Trump, etc. have attained, when being harsh on these American heros/icons. That's too bad.

Not a neglect thing, more a why fawn over the balls of these two? Why should anyone reflect?

Anyone nut polishing politicians..might need a hobby

originally posted by: visitedbythem
a reply to: johnnylaw16

That is a dead man walking. Shame on the DNC for using someone so far along in deadly mental disease.

what deadly mental disease have you seen proof he has, are you saying you have seen his medical records, i take it you are part of his medical team, if so should you be sharing such information, are you not breaching patient confidentiality