OK Folks, This is how this next month is going down Get ready!

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: Veryolduser

Whatever you have to tell yourself to justify your reality.

You're advocating military takeover before proof has been presented.

ANTIFA used allegations to justify the actions.

Now some of the right is advocating martial law.

As I said earlier, whoever is playing psyops for people's mind clearly has much of the country under their thumb.

I’m not advocating for anything. I’m stating a point you obviously don’t like! That as things get more partisan and extreme the other side will respond in same.

What is a vote? Think about that! It’s freedom of speech! The left and big tech has already censored the right and are extremely happy with censoring the right! This isn’t a precedent the right created. Don’t give me the bull# about create your own platform because it was done and the left attacked the sponsors, when they didn’t run adds and used donations the left attacked PayPal, when the right used other methods they attacked the domain hosting company.

I don’t like the use of him declaring marshal law! Who would? No matter which way you look at this it’s bad
A: Biden wins and your vote doesn’t matter ever and the elites just rig the elections to who they like. B: trump does some dictator move and makes himself king “I don’t know”

Or we can do a full audit on the election in contested states where republicans think fraud happened!

a reply to: network dude

The difference being these people are actually advocating a military take over, just like every communist that has ever sized power has done. Luckily this has no chance of happening.

Tell me what's "rational" about this idea?

a reply to: ChaoticOrder

That is an incredibly fair position.

I can live with, and even admire that.

originally posted by: FauxMulder
a reply to: network dude

The difference being these people are actually advocating a military take over, just like every communist that has ever sized power has done. Luckily this has no chance of happening.

Tell me what's "rational" about this idea?

What’s the difference between that and rigging an election?

I will wait! Also wasn’t the left saying they are making lists of trump supporters and wanting to cancel culture them.

What do commies have to say about it.

Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything," - Josef Stalin."

originally posted by: Veryolduser

originally posted by: FauxMulder
a reply to: network dude

The difference being these people are actually advocating a military take over, just like every communist that has ever sized power has done. Luckily this has no chance of happening.

Tell me what's "rational" about this idea?

What’s the difference between that and rigging an election?

Not much. But you need to prove it was rigged in court. Not on the internet. So far, they have not been able to do that.

I will wait! Also wasn’t the left saying they are making lists of trump supporters and wanting to cancel culture them.

The left says all types of crazy crap. Interesting that the right now sounds exactly like the left did after Hillary lost, no?

a reply to: Veryolduser

I'll start off by saying I reread it, and I don't think you did clearly advocate for military action, so that's on me.

That said, you're still acting as if this was clearly a fraudulent election. That remains to be seen.

I'll even give you advertising was a hurdle this go round... But I didn't hear the right complaining when the media gave Trump billions in free publicity in 16', of how Facebook sold the Trump campaign team developer tools to target users.

Private companies aren't fair. That's not their mission statement. To attempt to make them fair would require regulation, and that would entrust the government.

originally posted by: FauxMulder
a reply to: CharlesT

Are you seriously cheering for a military take over and for Trump to make himself winner by EO? I don't care who it is leading such a thing, left or right....it'd be wrong.

Kinda like media is declaring gitmo joe the winner? Nobody believes Biden won fair.

I know, it's RT, but if even anything posted on RT ihas even the slightes truth about it, it is beter than we get from any of our "Corporate" news sources. None of them can be trusted...
My post disappeared. Cyber warfare is happening on us now.
www.rt.com...
China’s latest assault in tech battle with US is a way of starving the American war machine

By Tom Fowdy, a British writer and analyst of politics and international relations with a primary focus on East Asia. By limiting access to China’s AI and rare earth metals, Beijing is responding to President Trump’s endless stream of sanctions. But this latest move is set to cause big problems for the companies that work with the US military. China’s announcement of new laws controlling the exports of ‘sensitive items’ in a way that mirrors the US Commerce Department’s ‘entity list’ is the latest example of escalating tensions between Beijing and Washington. The new regulations are set to control items said to be vital to the country’s national security, including military items, strategic technologies, artificial intelligence algorithms, and, most strikingly, rare earth mineral exports. The announcement comes as Donald Trump’s administration uses its last days to double down on China, with media reporting that it is set to blacklist the Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation and the China National Offshore Oil Corporation as firms allegedly ‘controlled’ by the country’s military.

a reply to: Veryolduser

Trump cannot ipto facto change their election laws and demand them to use different machines.

I wasn't suggesting that, I was suggesting things like actual security standards and practices that have to be followed, software standards and code reviews by independent parties, secure logging protocols to ensure the voting records cannot be hidden or tampered with, cryptographic protocols to ensure every vote can be verified, more security measures on mail-in ballots, etc. Really just anything to fix the absolutely vulnerable system used in the US. I know it's easy to say in hindsight but Trump had every warning and clearly knew it was an issue.

Plus it seems like a lot of people in positions to investigate this type of fraud are not doing so, which indicates Trump didn't fire enough people even though he knew he should have, probably because he wanted to prevent criticism from the media who complained every time he fired someone who deserved it. Once again though that's Trump's fault for having too much faith in people he should have known would betray him. Like I said Trump still has a fair chance of winning, and what state level courts decide doesn't really matter that much.

a reply to: FauxMulder

typically you would say to present it in court. But the Joint Chiefs don't operate within the court system, and would need to build a popular consensus prior to taking any action. The only way they can operate on this is with a public case.

a reply to: kwakakev
That's it. Definitely a hit movie.

This site glows in the dark now the amount of fed posting and shill posting is amazing. It has always been that way this watered down closely controlled and monitored “conspiracy” website.

Appeal to reason guys! Trump has gone to far!

Yeah so has the left! they burned down cities, harassed and doxed anyone right wing for 4 years, created a hoax investigation on a sitting president, used hearsay to try and impeach him, deplatformed right wing influencers and everyday people to censor them, then rigged an election. Clearly giving them what they want will be better right?

The funny thing is I don’t want that to happen I don’t want trump to declare marshal law and over throw the election. All I want is people to view the source code on the voting machines and check ballots! Do a full audit not in every state but only the states they think something is wrong.

Durr you’re the same as a commie! Horseshoe theory guys!

Horseshoe theory!

A: people shouldn’t be allowed to have sex with animals!
B: people should totally be allowed to have sex with animal
C:come on guys let’s meet in the middle you can get blowjobs from animals.

C are the appeal to reason people while the left consistently pushes the Overton window they will consistently try to find the middle ground.

a reply to: Veryolduser

Or we can do a full audit on the election in contested states where republicans think fraud happened!

What difference will that make? The trumpers will just deny the audit, like they are doing now, if it dosen't confirm their bias.

originally posted by: ChaoticOrder
a reply to: Veryolduser

Trump cannot ipto facto change their election laws and demand them to use different machines.

I wasn't suggesting that, I was suggesting things like actual security standards and practices that have to be followed, software standards and code reviews by independent parties, secure logging protocols to ensure the voting records cannot be hidden or tampered with, cryptographic protocols to ensure every vote can be verified, more security measures on mail-in ballots, etc. Really just anything to fix the absolutely vulnerable system used in the US. I know it's easy to say in hindsight but Trump had every warning and clearly knew it was an issue.

Plus it seems like a lot of people in positions to investigate this type of fraud are not doing so, which indicates Trump didn't fire enough people even though he knew he should have, probably because he wanted to prevent criticism from the media who complained every time he fired someone who deserved it. Once again though that's Trump's fault for having too much faith in people he should have known would betray him. Like I said Trump still has a fair chance of winning, and what state level courts decide doesn't really matter that much.

They have them! But you can’t tell # if you can’t even view the machines! It’s reported that the action log doesn’t exist on dominion voting machines “ie it doesn’t keep record of who’s logged in, if someone put in a thumb drive or what programs run on it and what time! That’s standard for all government compliant machines along with databases to show the logs.

a reply to: Veryolduser

That was a most excellent oration.

a reply to: CharlesT

First of all, I think your movie needs more eye candy.

Throw in a smoking hot blond who has a doctorate in something as well as being a former Navy Seal. Add an antagonist, preferably a smoking hot Asian with an eyepatch who sells black market weapons to terrorists.

Kill somebody's dog, kidnap someone's daughter, couple of car chases, some explosions, resolve some long standing family drama, and then you got a movie.

a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan

If they have this evidence they need to present it sooner rather than later. It's getting late in the game. I don't want Biden to be president but I'm not willing to burn the country down because of it. Especially since he'll be a lame duck from the get-go and even more of a lame duck when the Republicans take the house in 2022.

originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: Veryolduser

Or we can do a full audit on the election in contested states where republicans think fraud happened!

What difference will that make? The trumpers will just deny the audit, like they are doing now, if it dosen't confirm their bias.

No they won’t! If ballots come back from forensics and the voting machines source code and data is viewed nobody will say # if Biden won! Most people will be shocked yeah but simply grabbing all the ballots and running them through the counter again isn’t a full audit. Also anyplace that threw out envelopes of mailed in votes so signatures can’t be checked losses their vote! It’s required and always has been in case of audit

a reply to: ChaoticOrder

I support Trump but if he did nothing to properly ensure the election was secure he has no one else to blame.

You don't understand how little control the federal government actually has over the individual state election processes. To put it bluntly, zero. The states control their elections and there was nothing Trump could do to stop the illegality he saw happening before everyone's eyes.

originally posted by: FauxMulder
a reply to: network dude

The difference being these people are actually advocating a military take over, just like every communist that has ever sized power has done. Luckily this has no chance of happening.

Tell me what's "rational" about this idea?

The things that have happened over the last few years and particularly in the past year have all of the hallmarks of a color revolution perpetrated by the Left.

Labeling resistance to this movement can hardy be equated to a communist power grab.