Democrats Nuke Georgia Voting Machine Server on "Accident" During Recount

originally posted by: TrulyColorBlind
Posted by Annee:
"Has wrong doing been proven in court?
I’ve seen plenty of accusations on ATS, but actual proof seems to be elusive."

Posted by iwanttobelieve70:
"What would you consider proof?"

Posted by Annee:
"By the courts."

Posted by iwanttobelieve70:
"By the courts what? What do you consider evidence? That was a dense answer."

Posted by Annee:
"Seriously?
Proven in a court if law — is not that complicated."

There is the exchange you were engaged in that I responded to. It can not be any clearer. Now, answer this question:

So, if election fraud is proven in a court of law, you will apologise and admit you were wrong? And you're saying there was no election fraud because there was no proof - that is what you're saying and that is what I am asking you to answer about. Just say yes or no that if election fraud was proven in court that you will admit to being wrong. Don't equivocate with your answer. Equivocate means "To use equivocal language in an attempt to mislead." It seems you have a problem comprehending things, so I added that definition for your benefit so that you could answer the question coherently and keep deflecting.

TCB

I’ve already answered this in previous post.

Apologize for what?

Wrong about what?

For stating these accusations have to be proven in court?

Accident/Intentional — the answers the same.

It’s how our justice system works.

Where have I said anything I need to apologize for being wrong.

I made no accusations. Either side.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: TrulyColorBlind
Posted by Annee:
"Has wrong doing been proven in court?
I’ve seen plenty of accusations on ATS, but actual proof seems to be elusive."

Posted by iwanttobelieve70:
"What would you consider proof?"

Posted by Annee:
"By the courts."

Posted by iwanttobelieve70:
"By the courts what? What do you consider evidence? That was a dense answer."

Posted by Annee:
"Seriously?
Proven in a court if law — is not that complicated."

There is the exchange you were engaged in that I responded to. It can not be any clearer. Now, answer this question:

So, if election fraud is proven in a court of law, you will apologise and admit you were wrong? And you're saying there was no election fraud because there was no proof - that is what you're saying and that is what I am asking you to answer about. Just say yes or no that if election fraud was proven in court that you will admit to being wrong. Don't equivocate with your answer. Equivocate means "To use equivocal language in an attempt to mislead." It seems you have a problem comprehending things, so I added that definition for your benefit so that you could answer the question coherently and keep deflecting.

TCB

I’ve already answered this in previous post.

Apologize for what?

Wrong about what?

For stating these accusations have to be proven in court?

Accident/Intentional — the answers the same.

It’s how our justice system works.

Where have I said anything I need to apologize for being wrong.

I made no accusations. Either side.

You won't answer the question. You keep deflecting and you know it.
I give up.
You win.


TCB

originally posted by: TrulyColorBlind

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: TrulyColorBlind
Posted by Annee:
"Has wrong doing been proven in court?
I’ve seen plenty of accusations on ATS, but actual proof seems to be elusive."

Posted by iwanttobelieve70:
"What would you consider proof?"

Posted by Annee:
"By the courts."

Posted by iwanttobelieve70:
"By the courts what? What do you consider evidence? That was a dense answer."

Posted by Annee:
"Seriously?
Proven in a court if law — is not that complicated."

There is the exchange you were engaged in that I responded to. It can not be any clearer. Now, answer this question:

So, if election fraud is proven in a court of law, you will apologise and admit you were wrong? And you're saying there was no election fraud because there was no proof - that is what you're saying and that is what I am asking you to answer about. Just say yes or no that if election fraud was proven in court that you will admit to being wrong. Don't equivocate with your answer. Equivocate means "To use equivocal language in an attempt to mislead." It seems you have a problem comprehending things, so I added that definition for your benefit so that you could answer the question coherently and keep deflecting.

TCB

I’ve already answered this in previous post.

Apologize for what?

Wrong about what?

For stating these accusations have to be proven in court?

Accident/Intentional — the answers the same.

It’s how our justice system works.

Where have I said anything I need to apologize for being wrong.

I made no accusations. Either side.

You won't answer the question. You keep deflecting and you know it.
I give up.
You win.


TCB

You just don’t like the answer.

Done.

a reply to: Hypntick

Then the lowly voters out there going along with the hype of hating individuals...they don't see the constitution being trampled upon.

originally posted by: carewemust
Hidden video camera catches a nervous/antsy Dominion software employee MANIPULATING VOTE TOTALS in a suburb of Atlanta Georgia, during the November national election.

Source w/clip: twitter.com...

BTW: Georgia's Governor Kemp Paid $180,000,000 taxpayer dollars for Dominion to handle the election. Dominion usually charges much less. Guess which GA 2 officials made millions personally off this deal? According to attorney Lin Wood, it was Georgia Governor Kemp, and Secretary of State Raffensperger.

This is exactly why you guys are getting laughed at. No one has a f*cking clue what that guy is doing at that computer. You can’t see the screen enough to even know if he’s looking at election results or his bank account. He could have been loading all his hentai porn onto a USB drive for all anyone knows. But don’t let that stop anyone from claiming he was changing votes. DEFINITIVE PROOF (not really but let’s go with it) LOOK EVERYONE!

a reply to: Drucifer

That must be the Kraken!

Freaking amazing that some will conclude based on that clip that votes were being flipped when the video offers nothing. This is more than grasping at straws here.

So many on hear refuse to listen to or accept rational explanations on why we do not have proof of widespread fraud or what is considered evidence but see a video like this and jump to the conclusion that it proves what they want to be true.

No amount of data or facts will change their mind. Their confirmation bias is too strong.

a reply to: network dude

The amount of crying after this election is much worst than 2016.

The Trump team wants to subvert the will of the people and subvert the election results because they can not accept the loss.

When someone is used to winning by cheating, they believe the only way someone can win is by cheating.

As many others have posted, there are paper ballots that were hand recounted in Georgia so this claim even if true has no consequences to an accurate recount.

a reply to: Annee

You need a court to tell you wiping ballot history on the very voting machines in question shouldn’t be done. Wake up Annee. Put your left wing partisan glasses away.

originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: network dude

The amount of crying after this election is much worst than 2016.

The Trump team wants to subvert the will of the people and subvert the election results because they can not accept the loss.

The left was crying Russian collusion for years after the Trump victory...

We are simply asking for the voting machines to be audited. No one is rioting on the streets or burning down businesses...

The Democrats are so powerful it's hard to make this stuff sick.

I keep saying it.

But dems are align with the media, the control q majority of tv, radio, internet,

Dems are akith with silicon valley. algorithms to surpress conservative comments, lots of ways to choose what info you want to be seen.

Dems are align with hollyweird, lots of money, power and influence coming from that industry.

Dems are and have packed the courts, prosecutors and judges refusing to charge certain groups.
Judges tossing out Republican claims.

Dems say boots on the ground in the form of antifa and BLM. Soldiers who have literally killed and assaulted people...soldiers willing to fight against police.

This huge deep state needs to be broken down.
Trump was the first to call them out, but even as president they were too powerful
.
Real Americans should want nothing to do with what the Democrat party has become

a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

Remember back in the good old days when elected officials actually went to jail for breaking the law?

originally posted by: interupt42

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
a reply to: Doctor Smith

They just broke the law by destroying evidence. That´s up to 20 years in prison and $10,000 fine right there.

-MM

Yeah but did they have bad intentions when destroying the evidence?

Seriously ????!!!!!

Georgia's Secretary of State is naïve, or complicit?

Which one?: twitter.com...

I thought the USELESS Garbage-in/Garbage-out Georgia recount was finished.

What's with this 12,000 ballots need scanning alert?: twitter.com...

originally posted by: carewemust
Georgia's Secretary of State is naïve, or complicit?

Which one?: twitter.com...

Yeah, you’re right—it must be one of those two options. It couldn’t be that he just competently did his job . . .

a reply to: cooperton

No one is rioting on the streets or burning down businesses...

Sidney Powell and Lin Wood Powerful Speech On Massive Voter Fraud!

The people are getting organized and crowds forming. What is going to happen on Jan 20th? Another million MAGA march or Biden with a few circles?

originally posted by: Bloodworth
The Democrats are so powerful it's hard to make this stuff sick.

I keep saying it.

But dems are align with the media, the control q majority of tv, radio, internet,

Dems are akith with silicon valley. algorithms to surpress conservative comments, lots of ways to choose what info you want to be seen.

Dems are align with hollyweird, lots of money, power and influence coming from that industry.

Dems are and have packed the courts, prosecutors and judges refusing to charge certain groups.
Judges tossing out Republican claims.

Dems say boots on the ground in the form of antifa and BLM. Soldiers who have literally killed and assaulted people...soldiers willing to fight against police.

This huge deep state needs to be broken down.
Trump was the first to call them out, but even as president they were too powerful
.
Real Americans should want nothing to do with what the Democrat party has become

The CPUSA has teamed up with the Democrats, and Soros, and as you said Big Tech and Hollywood(which was already infiltrated by communists anyway).
Obama was the product of little Commie Stanley Ann who had to goal of mating to achieve their ends, as the young recruits were asked. This is not an accident. There have been up to 72 members of Congress who were also members of DSA. I’ve been talking about it since I joined ats and just had people roll their eyes at me and tell me I don’t know what Marxism is. Now it’s the radical Left controlling the dnc and they’ve gone full bore voter fraud.

originally posted by: johnnylaw16

originally posted by: carewemust
Georgia's Secretary of State is naïve, or complicit?

Which one?: twitter.com...

Yeah, you’re right—it must be one of those two options. It couldn’t be that he just competently did his job . . .

Care was just being nice. I won’t be. These people mean business and as the Marxist maxim dictates, “the ends justify the means”. This has been nothing short of a communist coup and involves the direct complicity of such officials. Who is likely naive are the massive numbers of poll workers on the ground who involved themselves because they believed the Big Lie”.