Democrats Nuke Georgia Voting Machine Server on "Accident" During Recount

Obviously.

They think they can get away with it, an probably can.

The ATS Left see no issue with it unless it's affecting theirs.

originally posted by: Guiltyguitarist

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Hypntick
a reply to: Echo007

So far, that has been the most troubling aspect of this. At the end of the day it doesn't matter who actually won, at least in my opinion. However, when you remove the trust of that large of a segment of the population it does irreparable harm to the nation as a whole. There is also an element of danger there as a percentage of that larger group may feel slighted enough to do something about it.

Are all the judges part of the deceit?

Just the ones to whom Zuckerberg paid $400 million.

Let me know when you prove that in court.

Until then — unsubstantiated — like most everything else.

There is no voter fraud.

Well there is fraud but it’s not wide spread.

Well it’s wide spread but not enough to change the elections.

Well the servers can’t be hacked.

Well they can be hacked but they were not connected to the internet.

Well they were hard wired to the internet but they were secure.

Well they really were not secure they were routed to Frankfort Germany.

They want you to believe that it’s an imperfect system but it appears every single flaw in the system favored one candidate. 570,000 votes to 3200 came in for one candidate after counting was stopped.

They sent observers home for a water leak that was faked the votes shifted without legally required observers then the machines they used are wiped clean but there is no evidence.

If this was a murder trial and you were the defendant you would plea out to avoid the death penalty. No evidence my butt.

originally posted by: Annee
unsubstantiated — like most everything else.

Like the votes in Atlanta that were just wiped from the voting machine so they couldn't be audited.

originally posted by: cooperton

originally posted by: Annee
unsubstantiated — like most everything else.

Like the votes in Atlanta that were just wiped from the voting machine so they couldn't be audited.

Has wrong doing been proven in court?

I’ve seen plenty of accusations on ATS, but actual proof seems to be elusive.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: cooperton

originally posted by: Annee
unsubstantiated — like most everything else.

Like the votes in Atlanta that were just wiped from the voting machine so they couldn't be audited.

Has wrong doing been proven in court?

I’ve seen plenty of accusations on ATS, but actual proof seems to be elusive.

What would you consider proof?

originally posted by: iwanttobelieve70

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: cooperton

originally posted by: Annee
unsubstantiated — like most everything else.

Like the votes in Atlanta that were just wiped from the voting machine so they couldn't be audited.

Has wrong doing been proven in court?

I’ve seen plenty of accusations on ATS, but actual proof seems to be elusive.

What would you consider proof?

By the courts.

If my wife died of a gunshot and I melt my gun down am I going to jail? Is that evidence?

originally posted by: Annee


By the courts.

Well when the court orders the machines to be protected so they can be audited and then they end up being wiped clean, yeah I would say that implies guilt...

Even if this is true, there are still paper ballots to use.

Those who want Trump to win are getting more desperate. I have never seen so many adults melt down because their team lost.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: iwanttobelieve70

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: cooperton

originally posted by: Annee
unsubstantiated — like most everything else.

Like the votes in Atlanta that were just wiped from the voting machine so they couldn't be audited.

Has wrong doing been proven in court?

I’ve seen plenty of accusations on ATS, but actual proof seems to be elusive.

What would you consider proof?

By the courts.

By the courts what? What do you consider evidence? That was a dense answer.

a reply to: cooperton

It does not matter if all the machines are wiped clean.

Georgia is doing a hand recount using paper ballots, the paper ballots the machine scans and records.

originally posted by: jrod
Even if this is true, there are still paper ballots to use.

Those who want Trump to win are getting more desperate. I have never seen so many adults melt down because their team lost.

Ok, the mail in ballots come in you check the signatures and toss the envelopes. Problem is we tossed the legally required observers because of a water leak that didn’t happen.

originally posted by: iwanttobelieve70

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: iwanttobelieve70

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: cooperton

originally posted by: Annee
unsubstantiated — like most everything else.

Like the votes in Atlanta that were just wiped from the voting machine so they couldn't be audited.

Has wrong doing been proven in court?

I’ve seen plenty of accusations on ATS, but actual proof seems to be elusive.

What would you consider proof?

By the courts.

By the courts what? What do you consider evidence? That was a dense answer.

Seriously?

Proven in a court if law — is not that complicated.

originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: cooperton

It does not matter if all the machines are wiped clean.

Georgia is doing a hand recount using paper ballots, the paper ballots the machine scans and records.

The ones that were not shredded and destroyed you mean.

a reply to: yuppa

Have you ever worked as an election official?

If you have, then you would know this kind of stuff does not happen.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: iwanttobelieve70

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: iwanttobelieve70

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: cooperton

originally posted by: Annee
unsubstantiated — like most everything else.

Like the votes in Atlanta that were just wiped from the voting machine so they couldn't be audited.

Has wrong doing been proven in court?

I’ve seen plenty of accusations on ATS, but actual proof seems to be elusive.

What would you consider proof?

By the courts.

By the courts what? What do you consider evidence? That was a dense answer.

Seriously?

Proven in a court if law — is not that complicated.

So, if fraud is proven in a court of law, you will apologise and admit you were wrong? Just say yes or no and don't equivocate.

a reply to: jrod

Where in the hell you been for the last 4 years? Under a rock? On a boat sailing the ocean?

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Guiltyguitarist

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Hypntick
a reply to: Echo007

So far, that has been the most troubling aspect of this. At the end of the day it doesn't matter who actually won, at least in my opinion. However, when you remove the trust of that large of a segment of the population it does irreparable harm to the nation as a whole. There is also an element of danger there as a percentage of that larger group may feel slighted enough to do something about it.

Are all the judges part of the deceit?

Just the ones to whom Zuckerberg paid $400 million.

Let me know when you prove that in court.

Until then — unsubstantiated — like most everything else.

All of a sudden a court has to prove something to you? Would you like me to repost your last 4 years back to you?
Everything the CNN told you, you came on here and regurgitated as if you were getting supplemental income to do so.
How’s that Russian Collusion going for you? You swallowed Schiff’s lies and asked for seconds.
Google can tell you Zuck spent 400 million dollars on this election, you don’t need someone wearing a black robe to tell you that.
But that’s normal, right?

originally posted by: jrod
Even if this is true, there are still paper ballots to use.

Those who want Trump to win are getting more desperate. I have never seen so many adults melt down because their team lost.

Yes you have, when Hillary lost, cut the BS out.

The "desperation" you ignorantly perceive is real word valid accusations that you should embrace as well. Because, one day, a ballsy repub will do the same.