General McInerney says Kraken is the 305th Military Intelligence Battalion

deep underground military bases would keep this out of the public's eye...

didn't we find out that the Army was preparing soldiers for battle "underground"?

I seriously wonder why...

originally posted by: BigfootNZ

You do realise the ramifications and pretext this would have on the international stage... right? America attacking and killing German soilders in an unsanctioned or covert operation on an ally, within an allies borders?

Right?... the fact Germany hasnt come out and screamed bloody murder about it makes me wonder juuuuuuust a tad, if its, you know... complete BS?

Just saying...

No big deal. I remember when our "ally" Israel attacked a US Navy ship, killing 34 sailors and wounding many more. The US didn't scream bloody murder. We just hushed it up, gave them money and nuclear weapons, and we're still "allies" to this day.

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation

General McInerney (Ret) said today that Powell´s "Kraken" refers to the nickname for the 305th Military Intelligence Battalion based out of Arizona.

Let's just hope they know enough not to stare directly at Nancy Pelosi. That didn't end well for the other Kraken.

a reply to: BigfootNZ

I"ve been searching, what little I know how do do, and found nothing but echo chamber reports on this,all from small conservative outlets many of which merely repeat what others have posted. I wondered about this general so I looked him up and found that he has a history of conspiracy views and this

n a May 2018 interview with Charles Payne on Fox News, McInerney asserted that torture had "worked on" John McCain and "That's why they call him 'Songbird John,"[22][23][24] referencing an unverified claim made against McCain during the Republican primary in South Carolina in 2000.[23][24] Payne later apologized to McCain and his family for the remark.[24][25] Afterward, Fox News announced that McInerney would never appear on Fox News or Fox Business again.[26

That was from wiki. So if this is true and even FOX will no longer give this man air time, well, I gotta go with your assumption of ''complete BS. Guess I'll wait for CNN to clear this up for me.....Jusssssssssssst kiddinggggg.

a reply to: TerryMcGuire

A LOT of us here on ATS also happen to have a history of conspiracy views.

Just a little FYI you might want to consider...

a reply to: Murgatroid
Rightly so Mr. Roid, myself included. But I don't hold up this guys words more seriously than I do what I hear around here.

a reply to: TerryMcGuire

Powell has also mentioned a raid on Scytl servers in Europe on FOX News. But she´s probably not credible either in your book.

-MM

a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

Sure, we have had threads on this woman as well. While I know nothing about her other than what has been told about her and the things she is saying, yeah, too much of what she is espousing seems to me to be off the wall. That of course along with the suits she has presented that have been flatly dismissed. And oh yeah, Trump had her kicked off of his elite team of lawyers. That too.

5 heroes to 1 POS is not credible.

originally posted by: PurpleFox
deep underground military bases would keep this out of the public's eye...

didn't we find out that the Army was preparing soldiers for battle "underground"?

I seriously wonder why...

Have you been watching too many 007 films? The bad guys bases are usually underground or in a mountain.

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

Sure, we have had threads on this woman as well. While I know nothing about her other than what has been told about her and the things she is saying, yeah, too much of what she is espousing seems to me to be off the wall. That of course along with the suits she has presented that have been flatly dismissed. And oh yeah, Trump had her kicked off of his elite team of lawyers. That too.

Trump distanced himself from her so she was able to go rogue and release the Karen. Oops, sorry, Kraken.

a reply to: Cobaltic1978
Right. Kraken not Karen. Also right, ''rogue'' not ''rouge''. Maybe she uses too much lipstick as well.

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: Cobaltic1978
Right. Kraken not Karen. Also right, ''rogue'' not ''rouge''. Maybe she uses too much lipstick as well.

It´s strange how you keep saying that there is no election fraud in this election and bash every post related to it when I remember your threads from back in 2016 after Trump won:

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire

So, these world controllers let us hold an election a couple of months ago. One of their two 'chosen' offerings to us to continue our illusion of free democracy was a wimp who had to beg people clap for him even though he came from one of their elite families.
...
The only reason Trump could win that election is because TPTB have allowed it to happen. Or more likely, orchestrated it. All that has happened is that they may have altered their plans a bit, pulled in a little folding chair so he can sit in the corner of their meeting halls. That's all he ever really wanted in the first place, just to be allowed to sit amongst them.

Switch "Trump" with "Biden" and it´s almost the exact thing that Trump supporters say today, but now it´s all of the sudden it can´t possibly be election fraud you say? Is this because your candidate won this time? Can´t you at least admit that all these discrepancies put together is at least worth investigating further?

-MM

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

Sure, we have had threads on this woman as well. While I know nothing about her other than what has been told about her and the things she is saying, yeah, too much of what she is espousing seems to me to be off the wall. That of course along with the suits she has presented that have been flatly dismissed. And oh yeah, Trump had her kicked off of his elite team of lawyers. That too.

Oops

edit on 30/11/20 by Cobaltic1978 because: (no reason given)

a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

Maybe you could provide the link to that old post of mine, so I could grasp the context in which I wrote it. But to answer your question, it may be I admit.

I do recall though years back, maybe around 2000 when news reports began to emerge on the ownership an manufacture of theses voting machines. Allegations pushed in both directions on how they might be manipulated. So I figured that people either would or wouldn't see that problem fixed. Both Repubs and Dems I figured might fix them.

But now I see that apparently , the security of these machines is still questionable. So if they did fix the problems from back then, it was not enough to make any losers happy. That's one of the reasons I liked Tulsi Gabbard, because she introduced a bill while in congress to do away with those machines and go to paper ballots entirely.

But you know what? Opinions change and information should bring about changes in our thinking. Wouldn't it be a sad world if we all held to what we believed five or ten or twenty years ago?

a reply to: TerryMcGuire

Here is your thread from 2016

-MM

a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

Yes, now I recall that thread. A large bit of ''tongue in cheek'' from my fevered mind at that time. Still I hold with my sarcasm there.

If you wish to go back and look you will find a later post on the first page that reads.

The game is rigged against us all, conservative and liberal alike.

So yes, exchange the name Trump for Biden and I guess that's what we got.


edit. Thanks for that effort sir.

a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

Wow...you certainly go the extra mile. That is one good memory or one unhealthy obsession you got there...

Now do me!!

oh wait...I hated Clinton/Bush/Obama/Trump and Biden equally....although Bush jr. made me laugh the most, always looking like he somehow rolled into this President gig without knowing how he got there.

Peace

originally posted by: VictorVonDoom
No big deal. I remember when our "ally" Israel attacked a US Navy ship, killing 34 sailors and wounding many more. The US didn't scream bloody murder. We just hushed it up, gave them money and nuclear weapons, and we're still "allies" to this day.

I wouldnt consider them the same. One is an 'ally' attacking an American assest and given Israels and Americas interesting and somewhat lopsided relationship in that regard im not surprised America didnt do any thing about it.

This one though is supposedly America attacking an 'allies' assest on the allies home soil. An ally that doesnt have the same ties as Israel does and who at often times have mildly strained relationship with America anyway. The idea that Germany would just shrug it off is just to far fetched.

Unless Germany gave America permission to do the raid (if the raid even happened), and even that has ramifications for Germanys government you'd think would be getting alot more press.

its one of those stories where it grabs the attention of a certain group of conspiracy followers, but when you start to think about it in detail, it all falls apart and the only way to make it all work is to start pulling out 'THEY can cover it up, EVERYONE is in on it, DEEPSTATE! etc etc' type stuff that just doesnt work.

My other thought about it is, if they have all this power and control, why on earth did this operation even get out into the light of day or even mentioned, and mentioned by the people it was mentioned by?

originally posted by: PapagiorgioCZ
5 heroes to 1 POS is not credible.

Thats DEAD no numbers on how many wounded is there? And CIA killers are former military as well.