Biden wins but 1 year later fraud proves Trump won

originally posted by: IAMALLYETALLIAM

originally posted by: putnam6

originally posted by: IAMALLYETALLIAM
a reply to: putnam6

Don't use words when you don't know what they mean then.

What are you, CULTURALLY APPROPRIATING our slang?

Go whinge somewhere else, I'm sure there's someone you can be outraged at in real life right near you.

I apologize I'm fine though, you however maybe like a frog in a sock. I thought bogan meant arrogant, snotty ... must have misread it in my Australian slang book. What is Australian for arrogant and snotty got a feeling I might need it later. Think I meant figjam. This is what is the best thing about ATS see we are learning and communicating and you are treating me as an equal even though I haven't got a brass razoo.

Hmm we would say someone arrogant and snotty is up themselves.

To be fair your bogan remark is not far off the mark though I'm probably something more akin to an articulate, professionally employed yobbo.

Picture an Aussie Ragnar Lodbrok in a pair of airmax that wears business clothes by day and talked himself in to the business world from the blue collar one, funnily enough my wife just the other day said I'm an oxymoron although she may have been being nice including the oxy part

Ahh, Travis Fimmel is excellent in Raised by Wolves.

Enjoy your youth, my friend. I'm am sure we have more in common than not. Also enjoy that the white-collar job and all of its benefits too, it's a good place to be in these uncertain times. Just don't ever forget your blue collar roots and work ethic. Hell, I'm beginning to sound like my Dad...

Haha, no. DJT cannot allow the criminal to win the white house due to fraud.

a reply to: putnam6

sorry to replys to the next trump fest Post .
Its just Makes ME sick posters talking about how the left wants to destroy the country while saying they want to destroy the country and NEVER for ONE second thinking about the FACT they will be destroying them self right along with the country .

any one who RIOTs should Be jailed any one who BURNS building's CSHOULD be jailed any one who Loots should be Jailed and any one who says They want have 170 Million people die should be jailed Because they are JUST as nuts as any they call left .

originally posted by: putnam6

originally posted by: IAMALLYETALLIAM

originally posted by: putnam6

originally posted by: IAMALLYETALLIAM
a reply to: putnam6

Don't use words when you don't know what they mean then.

What are you, CULTURALLY APPROPRIATING our slang?

Go whinge somewhere else, I'm sure there's someone you can be outraged at in real life right near you.

I apologize I'm fine though, you however maybe like a frog in a sock. I thought bogan meant arrogant, snotty ... must have misread it in my Australian slang book. What is Australian for arrogant and snotty got a feeling I might need it later. Think I meant figjam. This is what is the best thing about ATS see we are learning and communicating and you are treating me as an equal even though I haven't got a brass razoo.

Hmm we would say someone arrogant and snotty is up themselves.

To be fair your bogan remark is not far off the mark though I'm probably something more akin to an articulate, professionally employed yobbo.

Picture an Aussie Ragnar Lodbrok in a pair of airmax that wears business clothes by day and talked himself in to the business world from the blue collar one, funnily enough my wife just the other day said I'm an oxymoron although she may have been being nice including the oxy part

Ahh, Travis Fimmel is excellent in Raised by Wolves.

Enjoy your youth, my friend. I'm am sure we have more in common than not. Also enjoy that the white-collar job and all of its benefits too, it's a good place to be in these uncertain times. Just don't ever forget your blue collar roots and work ethic. Hell, I'm beginning to sound like my Dad...

Thanks mate and agree -like most other ATS users and people in general I am sure we agree on much more than disagree.

Will never forget my blue collar roots....I have a very rural/working class twang to my accent that is at times the butt of jokes when I am in the city in the office. That, plus nearly all of my mates and family are still blue collar workers....it's my culture. If I was paid the same and provided the same security sawmilling I would probably still do that if I'm honest.

Nothing wrong with sounding like your Dad, sounds like he is/was a wise man

some of you guys are Just like me wanting to live and for me be with my grand kids it does NOt bother you at all when some of these posters who call them self right wing start talking about how the city should all just burn or how 78 Million who did not vote for Trump are commie traitors who should, be shot ?

these people do start shooting they wont stop and ask who you voted for .

anyway I hope people get some sanity or it wont take a left or a right as they Bring it all down .

originally posted by: imdfreek
a bogan is some body that shaves once a week
drinks VB(Victoria bitter) tallies(long neck beer)

drives a pile of crap Commodore (Holden sedan) with accadacca(,ACDC)on flat knackers(full volume)with xxxx stickers(xxxx is our main beer, )unless they drink VB and if not they drink Bundy rum(Bunderberg Rum)
they call women Sheila's and Bird. as in this example below

crickey mate that sheila is a top bird
DILIGAF means
do I look like I give a fxxk
and FIGJAM is
fcck I'm good just ask me.
They are generally rowdy buggers but if you need help or you break down they will be the first to say
gdmatedoyaneedahand
but generally you get the customary greeting of owyagowenmate.
then pull a winnie red(Winfield red cigarette) out and then hit you up for a light.
and any arrogant person is called a rude knob short for (you are a rude arrogant drongo) (drongo is half dingo and half dumbass)
if they are being a smart arse they are then called a rude pounce(pronounced puwance)
now I'm goin to the out back on me 7ft tall Kangaroo.
kangaroo is Aboriginal for... Kangaroo
so hooroo and see youse at the pub for a couple of mothers milk.
and so ends today's lesson, now bugger off

a reply to: putnam6

That's fantastic don't know why but always been fascinated by Australia.

Accadacca on full knackers I can definitely relate too LOL and I must admit I may be more of a bogan myself LOL definitely in my youth

a reply to: IAMALLYETALLIAM

Yeah well done. The sincerity is just oozing from your post.

a reply to: RMFX1

Serious question, do you get satisfaction from being the manners and moral police on the internet?

Inbox me, I might have some alternative, more fulfilling hobbies for you to consider.

originally posted by: ThatDidHappen
Haha, no. DJT cannot allow the criminal to win the white house due to fraud.

a reply to: putnam6

I would agree but it's not that simple, and I doubt it would be handled as it was in 1877 regardless. This stuff is historic, and of course, this is just the question from the OP. If Biden were somehow found to be illegitimately the President a year later it would likely go to highly controversial impeachment proceedings. Even with an impeached and removed Biden not sure if they would reinstate Trump after the fact. Pretty sure it would end up in front of the Supreme Court.

a reply to: BadRandy217

Since its the electors vote that counts nothing would change. the electorial college votes decides who is president.

originally posted by: IAMALLYETALLIAM
a reply to: RMFX1

Serious question, do you get satisfaction from being the manners and moral police on the internet?

Inbox me, I might have some alternative, more fulfilling hobbies for you to consider.

No I don't, because no I'm not. I'm pointing out to you that you're were being a dick, which you were. If you have you have an issue with that then that's fine, I don't care if you're offended.

I thought I should let you know.

originally posted by: IAMALLYETALLIAM
a reply to: BadRandy217

Go Google it and do some research if you are interested in the topic is my suggestion.

This is a place for discussion of ideas not requesting people research a topic for you and report back

You know you don’t have to be here, just walk away like an adult not interested rather than a petulant child who want to control everyone

In passing I would like an answer but am not interested to find one myself,

originally posted by: IAMALLYETALLIAM
a reply to: BadRandy217

Go Google it and do some research if you are interested in the topic is my suggestion.

This is a place for discussion of ideas not requesting people research a topic for you and report back

first by any standard you wish to use your comment comes off as sounding like a self important , (non elected) decider of what is appropriate or not, arrogant douchwaffle

second.
this forum exists for all to not only give ideas, theories, and topics from someone for others to debate about, but also TO ASK QUESTIONS they wish answered.

on the later not everyone either has the skill or proper knowledge base to do the "most accurate" research , but also may not have the knowledge base to interpret or even understand the information that may be found.
hence why you ask for help , perspective and knowledge from others (ex teachers, friends or here) .
for example while i have a good logical mind , decent ability to do research (over a whole host of mediums) , i do not have a frame of reference to understand what i might find on string theory.
so i would ask for assistance like the OP did from here about it in say application of hyper dimensional travel .

third.

you then double down on your douchwaffle by showing you got 11 stars for your comment and claim it shows others believe as you do.
that shows NOTHING other than at least 11 others are also agreeing with a douchwaffle comment/attitude .

in and of itself the number of stars/agreements does not prove that your point is correct , factual or even civil
again for example there was a group known as The LaRouche movement that had over 40,000 people (far more than your 11) that agreed with his clearly crackpot ideas. like for example the queen of england was the leader of an international drug ring.
did the number of people make his ideas , claims ,ect right? no it didnt.

so your claim of 11 stars is nothing more than an affirmation that 11 people openly AGREE with your post...
nothing more, nothing less.
on a sideline note if i were to follow your "star" logic if say someone here calls you out and rates you as a douchwaffle for your comment and oh say gets 20 stars, would you then say you were wrong because they got more stars that you.. bet not.

fourth...
i will defend given the open forum that you had the right to make your comment as you did...
you however DO NOT have the right to claim your the deciding "king" (as it were) to what is appropriate or not on ATS... you can give YOUR OPINION and word it as such... with the understanding OTHERS CAN also comment on you as well...
but as others have stated unless it violates the T & C (something YOU DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO DO BTW) it is an acceptable question....

fifth
I could point out (fairly) that one course of action you could do in a civil minded theme is if you feel as you stated you did IGNORE AND NOT COMMENT on the OP .

alot of things here people decide to do that and more than a few i suspect do.
if this is such an affront to your "logic" then why not JUST LET IT GO and scroll on?

lastly my OPINION on your comment.

i suspect it falls on one of these (but could be wrong) themes

a. you feel self important that your OPINION is to be taken more seriously or as "law" . in short a self important narcissist.

b. you really cant help this person and instead of not commenting or admitting your lacking in some knowledge, ability, education, ect you cover it by attacking the person who asked... very petty way to cover ones inadequacies

c. you are what is called a "troll" and thrive on the conflict for conflict sake.

scrounger

originally posted by: Edumakated
I guess it depends on what you mean by proof. Do you mean a court comes out and says the 2020 Presidential Election was fraudulent. Stop. Period. No more discussion. Or do you mean there is clear proof that it was fraudulent, but nothing is ever officially declared?

In either case, I don't think anything would happen.

If it is the first case, I think it boils down to if Biden / Harris can be shown to have been complicit in the fraud. If nothing can be tied back to them directly, then I think nothing would happen. If it is shown they were complicit and knew what was going on, then I guess there could be an impeachment but that depends on who controls the congress / senate.

If it is the second scenario, then it will be like it is today. The media will provide cover and it will be chalked up as conspiracy theory. Nothing will happen.

The problem across the board is you have to assess what is best for the country. Do we really want the progressive left to burn down cities in their political temper tantrum?

So we let them hold that threat over our heads? Nope. Go after them immediately and it will stop. Or at least slow down. They haven't been punished (more like made into heroes) after the ongoing riots so why would they stop now?

The big question would be how it influences the 2022 elections. And the party with the presidency usually loses seats in the House and Senate. Chances are the Republicans take the House and expand their lead in the Senate. Then Joe and Kamala get impeached and tossed out simply for being illegitimate . Putting a Republican speaker in the presidency for the balance of the term.

Then if they have any smarts they will put in a election reform bill that fixes all the problems exposed in the 2020 election. And if they are really smart they will put through term and age limits and toss all the incumbents.

We can dream can't we.

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: IAMALLYETALLIAM
a reply to: BadRandy217

Go Google it and do some research if you are interested in the topic is my suggestion.

This is a place for discussion of ideas not requesting people research a topic for you and report back

You know you don’t have to be here, just walk away like an adult not interested rather than a petulant child who want to control everyone

In passing I would like an answer but am not interested to find one myself,

You do know you’re contradicting yourself by posting that right champ?

originally posted by: ntech
Chances are the Republicans take the House and expand their lead in the Senate. Then Joe and Kamala get impeached and tossed out simply for being illegitimate .

You aren't getting a super majority for impeachment.

originally posted by: IAMALLYETALLIAM

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: IAMALLYETALLIAM
a reply to: BadRandy217

Go Google it and do some research if you are interested in the topic is my suggestion.

This is a place for discussion of ideas not requesting people research a topic for you and report back

You know you don’t have to be here, just walk away like an adult not interested rather than a petulant child who want to control everyone

In passing I would like an answer but am not interested to find one myself,

You do know you’re contradicting yourself by posting that right champ?

As I said, I was interested in an answer
I saw the question and thought I would drop by for an answer.

Not specifically you saying it was an irrelevant question
I am still interested

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Depends on the impeachment charges. He does have outstanding criminal charges that could be charged such as bribery, blackmail, and abuse of power in the China and Ukraine matters. Just the smear of the charges might make him quit.