Biden wins but 1 year later fraud proves Trump won

originally posted by: pointr97

originally posted by: BadRandy217
Just curious how this would play out constitutionally.
Say Biden ends up becoming President but a year down the road true hard facts / unquestionable proof is there that Trump won. Does the constitution address this?
I'm sure the ATS brains will know how this plays out.

You get a Star and a Flag because you asked a good question, and Someone decided to be an ass.....Why?.....Because he has No clue what would happen.

I don't have a clue what would happen to be honest.

But if I were truly interested and not being intellectually lazy, I would pursue several lines of enquiry before making a post on ATS (that by all appearance breaches the sites T's & C's thread creation) asking if anybody knows.

I'd perhaps even provide some indication on what I think may happen and my current understanding of the situation.

Was not trying to be an ass, merely encouraging intellectual curiosity and the pursuit of answers....denying my own ignorance as it were.

originally posted by: Arizonaguy
a reply to: IAMALLYETALLIAM
Do the terms and conditions prevent posting a hypothetical situation for discussion in this forum?
If yes, then you have made a valid point
If not, then you shoukd probably apologize

I will not apologise for suggesting somebody pursue some information rather than outsourcing their own brain to a forum that is purportedly about denying ignorance.

What is Australian for IDGAF...

a reply to: putnam6

Don't use words when you don't know what they mean then.

What are you, CULTURALLY APPROPRIATING our slang?

Go whinge somewhere else, I'm sure there's someone you can be outraged at in real life right near you.

originally posted by: IAMALLYETALLIAM

originally posted by: Arizonaguy
a reply to: IAMALLYETALLIAM
Do the terms and conditions prevent posting a hypothetical situation for discussion in this forum?
If yes, then you have made a valid point
If not, then you shoukd probably apologize

I will not apologise for suggesting somebody pursue some information rather than outsourcing their own brain to a forum that is purportedly about denying ignorance.

Do you know what learning styles are?
If not, perhaps you should seek some assistance on this. It can enlighten your viewpoint on how different people approach informing themselves about a serious pursuit
Some people excel at hands on learning
Some people excel at a more studious approach, learning through research and discovery
Some people need a more direct approach
Who are you to question him?
If he has not broken any T&Cs then you're out of line.

originally posted by: visitedbythem
President Trump is working to reinstate the firing squad for just this purpose

I don't believe for one second that it was accidental that Sidney Powell is involved in this...

“Sidney Powell is registered as a MILITARY LAWYER and is the only one who can prosecute TREASON at a TRIBUNAL!” "... there are military personnel involved in these coming convictions. Given her solid background in legal practice at the federal level, Sidney Powell becomes the only lawyer who is qualified to prosecute TREASON at a Tribunal."

gnews.org...

Remember that line from the film "DejaVu"? It fits here like a GLOVE BTW... "You think you know what's coming? You don't have a clue."

a reply to: Arizonaguy

*Accel, abbreviation of accelerate - Excel is a Microsoft product.

I was going to mention to the OP that I didn't mean to come across as a knob and was merely suggesting they (did you ASSUME their gender!?) entertain their own intellectual curiosity as it is a quite fulfilling process until you tried to force me to apologise.

a reply to: IAMALLYETALLIAM
Tried to force you?
I merely suggested it
My, you're combative

originally posted by: IAMALLYETALLIAM

originally posted by: Arizonaguy
a reply to: IAMALLYETALLIAM
Do the terms and conditions prevent posting a hypothetical situation for discussion in this forum?
If yes, then you have made a valid point
If not, then you shoukd probably apologize

I will not apologise for suggesting somebody pursue some information rather than outsourcing their own brain to a forum that is purportedly about denying ignorance.

Curious, have you noticed this thread is literally telling you that you are being a douche?

If not, I'm saying, you are being a douche. Stop It.....>This place is literally for discussions, don't like it, don't post to the threads. It really is that simple. I've done it so many times, 'not worth my energy to respond'..

For someone that talks about intellectually lazy people as an insult......well, you are proving that theory absolutely correct.

originally posted by: IAMALLYETALLIAM
a reply to: putnam6

Don't use words when you don't know what they mean then.

What are you, CULTURALLY APPROPRIATING our slang?

Go whinge somewhere else, I'm sure there's someone you can be outraged at in real life right near you.

I apologize I'm fine though, you however maybe like a frog in a sock. I thought bogan meant arrogant, snotty ... must have misread it in my Australian slang book. What is Australian for arrogant and snotty got a feeling I might need it later. Think I meant figjam. This is what is the best thing about ATS see we are learning and communicating and you are treating me as an equal even though I haven't got a brass razoo.

originally posted by: pointr97

originally posted by: IAMALLYETALLIAM

originally posted by: Arizonaguy
a reply to: IAMALLYETALLIAM
Do the terms and conditions prevent posting a hypothetical situation for discussion in this forum?
If yes, then you have made a valid point
If not, then you shoukd probably apologize

I will not apologise for suggesting somebody pursue some information rather than outsourcing their own brain to a forum that is purportedly about denying ignorance.

Curious, have you noticed this thread is literally telling you that you are being a douche?

If not, I'm saying, you are being a douche. Stop It.....>This place is literally for discussions, don't like it, don't post to the threads. It really is that simple. I've done it so many times, 'not worth my energy to respond'..

For someone that talks about intellectually lazy people as an insult......well, you are proving that theory absolutely correct.

11 other users so far tend to agree with my sentiment;



Only two Karens jumping to the defense of somebody who was not even offended themselves.

OP, you're alright and I do apologise as I didn't mean to come across as a d**k but I stand by my sentiment. Guarantee you will find it fulfilling when you seek these answers and go on a journey of learning.

P.S oh no...not a douche, what will I tell my family about a random Karen on the internets thoughts about me?

originally posted by: putnam6

originally posted by: IAMALLYETALLIAM
a reply to: putnam6

Don't use words when you don't know what they mean then.

What are you, CULTURALLY APPROPRIATING our slang?

Go whinge somewhere else, I'm sure there's someone you can be outraged at in real life right near you.

I apologize I'm fine though, you however maybe like a frog in a sock. I thought bogan meant arrogant, snotty ... must have misread it in my Australian slang book. What is Australian for arrogant and snotty got a feeling I might need it later. Think I meant figjam. This is what is the best thing about ATS see we are learning and communicating and you are treating me as an equal even though I haven't got a brass razoo.

Hmm we would say someone arrogant and snotty is up themselves.

To be fair your bogan remark is not far off the mark though I'm probably something more akin to an articulate, professionally employed yobbo.

Picture an Aussie Ragnar Lodbrok in a pair of airmax that wears business clothes by day and talked himself in to the business world from the blue collar one, funnily enough my wife just the other day said I'm an oxymoron although she may have been being nice including the oxy part

originally posted by: IAMALLYETALLIAM

originally posted by: Arizonaguy
a reply to: IAMALLYETALLIAM
Do the terms and conditions prevent posting a hypothetical situation for discussion in this forum?
If yes, then you have made a valid point
If not, then you shoukd probably apologize

I will not apologise for suggesting somebody pursue some information rather than outsourcing their own brain to a forum that is purportedly about denying ignorance.

Maybe not but, It may be appropriate to apologise for being a dick about it.

a reply to: RMFX1

Second above your post.

Anyone else?

I really hope it does not happen the way the Right would want to cut off water to all the city's and have 50 million people die of thirst ( alest that is what they say They want to do on some post here .

AS things stand Now they say 170 Millions people are commies and traitors who should all be shot .
as Things now stand the rights HERE says If you dont like Trump that is what defines being left and all left should just die .

There are MORE calls for Killing and leaving city's Burn here then all of riots could ever get close to doing .
The right are Insane ( the left ? what the riots or looting which at the end of the day ENDED they want it to keep going .

There area way MORE anti police they want the police to step back and let the city's be totally destroyed .

NOW RIGHT all I am DOING is quoting what YOU posted RIGHT here at ATS .

mien while out in the real world THE RIGHT WING cops DID NOTHGING because a LEFTY WING governor told them to let them riot !

a reply to: midnightstar

I really hope it does not happen the way the Right would want to cut off water to all the city's and have 50 million people die of thirst ( alest that is what they say They want to do on some post here .

That was literally in California and it wasnt the right that threatened it:

The mayor of Los Angeles has said the city will be authorised to shut off water and power to properties where large parties and gatherings are held despite restrictions imposed to curb the spread of coronavirus.

At least be accurate if youre going to start making accusations

originally posted by: IAMALLYETALLIAM

originally posted by: pointr97

originally posted by: IAMALLYETALLIAM

originally posted by: Arizonaguy
a reply to: IAMALLYETALLIAM
Do the terms and conditions prevent posting a hypothetical situation for discussion in this forum?
If yes, then you have made a valid point
If not, then you shoukd probably apologize

I will not apologise for suggesting somebody pursue some information rather than outsourcing their own brain to a forum that is purportedly about denying ignorance.

Curious, have you noticed this thread is literally telling you that you are being a douche?

If not, I'm saying, you are being a douche. Stop It.....>This place is literally for discussions, don't like it, don't post to the threads. It really is that simple. I've done it so many times, 'not worth my energy to respond'..

For someone that talks about intellectually lazy people as an insult......well, you are proving that theory absolutely correct.

11 other users so far tend to agree with my sentiment;

Only two Karens jumping to the defense of somebody who was not even offended themselves.

OP, you're alright and I do apologise as I didn't mean to come across as a d**k but I stand by my sentiment. Guarantee you will find it fulfilling when you seek these answers and go on a journey of learning.

P.S oh no...not a douche, what will I tell my family about a random Karen on the internets thoughts about me?

Wow! Two logical fallacies in one post, to support your defense of bad behaviour ( Ad Hominem Fallacy, Bandwagon Fallacy).
Hey, if you're going to engage in intellectual dishonesty, why not double down on it?

a reply to: Arizonaguy

Don't you have a store manager somewhere to be requesting an audience with?

a bogan is some body that shaves once a week
drinks VB(Victoria bitter) tallies(long neck beer)

drives a pile of crap Commodore (Holden sedan) with accadacca(,ACDC)on flat knackers(full volume)with xxxx stickers(xxxx is our main beer, )unless they drink VB and if not they drink Bundy rum(Bunderberg Rum)
they call women Sheila's and Bird. as in this example below

crickey mate that sheila is a top bird
DILIGAF means
do I look like I give a fxxk
and FIGJAM is
fcck I'm good just ask me.
They are generally rowdy buggers but if you need help or you break down they will be the first to say
gdmatedoyaneedahand
but generally you get the customary greeting of owyagowenmate.
then pull a winnie red(Winfield red cigarette) out and then hit you up for a light.
and any arrogant person is called a rude knob short for (you are a rude arrogant drongo) (drongo is half dingo and half dumbass)
if they are being a smart arse they are then called a rude pounce(pronounced puwance)
now I'm goin to the out back on me 7ft tall Kangaroo.
kangaroo is Aboriginal for... Kangaroo
so hooroo and see youse at the pub for a couple of mothers milk.
and so ends today's lesson, now bugger off

a reply to: putnam6

I am Not left btw But They say I am because I don't like Trump Funny thing is I dont like Biden either .That was NOt about CA .
heck they have called me vial names and they don't know me JUST BECAUSE i wont vote Trump ! I wont vote Biden either . a POST SAID they should cut water off to ALL city's and let every one die of thirst maybe That inspired The person them .
Unless you are new to many here who call them self Right have called for GUNS to come out .
call half the country commies and traitors saying they should be shot either you don't read these poster here or you just want to pretend the so called Right are boys scouts .

Frankly I am Relived with how these people talked I really did start wondering if they would be destroying EVERY thing .
The so called left rioting over POLICE in what ever city's which has mostly died down and they still spew hate its Just not enough a few people died its just not enough a few Buildings h=got looted they want it all to burn down .

What was DONE IN sane city IS looters GOT ARRESTED and JAILED like TUCSON AZ .