It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: LookingAtMars
originally posted by: olaru12
Perhaps it should be extended. The recount in Wisconsin that trump demanded increased Bidens margin.
I don't think trump can rig the EC this time.
in.reuters.com...
Just like in GA, recounting fake ballots will not expose the fraud.
I am sure the fraud will be exposed and there will be no doubt.
Then hopefully, we can embrace the truth and unite the nation unlike it has been in 100 years.
originally posted by: 111DPKING111
New analysis by John R. Lott at the Justice Department on absentee ballots.
"A Simple Test for the Extent of Vote Fraud with Absentee Ballots in the 2020 Presidential Election: Georgia and Pennsylvania Data"
originally posted by: carewemust
An arrogant overconfident Democrat comes clean with the American public.
mobile.twitter.com...
A Democrat caller on Rush Limbaugh moments ago just bragged “We have control of the voting machines and we have control of all the judges so we don’t need to convince you [conservatives] of anything anymore, and by the next election we will have a supermajority.”
originally posted by: sligtlyskeptical
So you admit there has been no evidence of fraud exposed as of yet?
In October 2020, Lott was appointed as a senior adviser for research and statistics at the Office of Justice Programs within the U.S. Department of Justice.
In the course of a dispute with Otis Dudley Duncan in 1999–2000,[62][63] Lott claimed to have undertaken a national survey of 2,424 respondents in 1997, the results of which were the source for claims he had made beginning in 1997.[63]
In response to the dispute surrounding the missing survey, Lott created and used "Mary Rosh" as a sock puppet to defend his own works on Usenet and elsewhere. After investigative work by blogger Julian Sanchez, Lott admitted to use of the Mary Rosh persona. Sanchez also pointed out that Lott, posing as Rosh, not only praised his own academic writing, but also called himself "the best professor I ever had".
Prong one dramatically INCREASED the amount of absentee and mail-in ballots in the battleground states. Prong two dramatically DECREASED the level of scrutiny of such ballots.
No need to verify signatures on ballot submissions. No need for postmarks. No need to turn in your vote on time. Democratic-dominated counties can "pre-canvass" and "cure" ballot submissions which would normally be rejected. Oh, and you don't have to turn in your votes by mail or by personally delivering them to the courthouse as the law states; we'll just put a bunch of drop boxes all over the place with no security standards so everyone and their brother can drop off their votes (and as many others as they can harvest) unobserved by "watchers" like what happens at a normal polling place. And thanks to Mark Zuckerberg and other rich people with an agenda, those drop boxes will be well-funded, but only in Democratic-dominated areas. Finally, when we count all these mail-in votes, we'll make sure certain "watchers" are so far removed from the process, but still in the room, that no meaningful observation of the verification and count can be had.
This is where we're at in Pennsylvania. What do we do about it?
originally posted by: waynos
By contrast, a recording of Trump openly coercing the election officials to produce a favourable result by any means seems to elicit no response whatsoever. Even from the Dems,which I find very odd too (OK, I may have missed it but I can’t find one on here).
originally posted by: carewemust
Arizona is preparing to decertify Joe Biden as the winner, if the ongoing audit shows there were too many irregularities.
mobile.twitter.com...
originally posted by: BigfootNZ
originally posted by: waynos
By contrast, a recording of Trump openly coercing the election officials to produce a favourable result by any means seems to elicit no response whatsoever. Even from the Dems,which I find very odd too (OK, I may have missed it but I can’t find one on here).
This has been confusing me for a day or so and nice to see someone mention it... the fact there isnt even a single thread as far as i can find, dealing with Trumps criminally scary phone call to Georgia on ATS yet, speaks volumes about how much ATS has changed.
I've been teaching criminal law for over 50 years. I went through every word of that transcript, there is no crime there, period
originally posted by: sligtlyskeptical
originally posted by: LookingAtMars
originally posted by: olaru12
Perhaps it should be extended. The recount in Wisconsin that trump demanded increased Bidens margin.
I don't think trump can rig the EC this time.
in.reuters.com...
Just like in GA, recounting fake ballots will not expose the fraud.
I am sure the fraud will be exposed and there will be no doubt.
Then hopefully, we can embrace the truth and unite the nation unlike it has been in 100 years.
So you admit there has been no evidence of fraud exposed as of yet?
For those who believe “there is no evidence, you don’t know what you are talking about,” he said. “I’ve reviewed hours upon hours of public hearings. I have read almost all of the lawsuits that are out there. Most of them were dismissed on legal process grounds.”
I’m in possession of 574 pages of sworn affidavits, forensic reports, all of which would make its way in a court of law under the rules of evidence in a federal or state court. The fact that the evidence has not been heard here by these courts” should not be conflated into “this idea that there is no evidence,” Clements argued.
“The courts have done what they always do,” Clements explained. “When you have political matters, they want them to be decided politically, not in a court room, but through the elections, through the state legislatures.”
However, he observed, the main problem was that “we have a bunch of cowards. We have judges who are cowards, we have politicians that are cowards, and that’s the reality.”