Malfunctioning voting machine caught on camera

Note that this video is from August of 2019. The tagline below it reads "A man in Mississippi recorded a video of an electronic voting machine repeatedly selecting the wrong candidate." which in this case was (RINO)Tate Reeves, who is now Mississippi Governor.

Voters in other counties reported similar occurrences. Of course the secretary of state saved the day by sending a tech out to "fix" the malfunctioning equipment, though nobody knows if it was a glitch or tampered with. What I find particularly interesting is that Dominion's newest attorney, Michael Steele says swapping votes in a Dominion machine just isn't possible. Of course not.

a reply to: Klassified

Yet more evidence of fraud and/or malfunctions going to the wrong candidate. This entire election should be wiped away and another election day held with accurate machines. I don't want these machines helping any side.. I just wish other people (who favored a certain outcome) could be as honest.

a reply to: LSU2018
Or NO machines. All by hand with both R and D poll watchers.

originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: LSU2018
Or NO machines. All by hand with both R and D poll watchers.

Or maybe even a thumb print on the paper?

a reply to: Klassified

What I find particularly interesting is that Dominion's newest attorney, Michael Steele says swapping votes in a Dominion machine just isn't possible. Of course not.

Yeah, about that... I think he is technically correct, in that the machine alone cannot do anything really... it's the software that performs the functions. So it's probably the truth, but certainly not the WHOLE truth.

He was very clearly parsing his words in the most disingenuous way.

I believe it was Ben Franklin said something to the effect that sometimes half-truths are just big fat lies.

When the final tally is completed; more Biden votes were deleted and/or changed to a vote for trump.

It works both ways....

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: Klassified

What I find particularly interesting is that Dominion's newest attorney, Michael Steele says swapping votes in a Dominion machine just isn't possible. Of course not.

Yeah, about that... I think he is technically correct, in that the machine alone cannot do anything really... it's the software that performs the functions. So it's probably the truth, but certainly not the WHOLE truth.

He was very clearly parsing his words in the most disingenuous way.

I believe it was Ben Franklin said something to the effect that sometimes half-truths are just big fat lies.

Were those Dominion machines in Antrim County, Michigan? If they were then Michael Steele would be incorrect. I do understand that the official line is "human error" due to a clerk not updating the software (good way to pass the buck) but this most definitely happened. Regardless of what ones opinion is on this whole situation, we need to at the very least acknowledge that this can and did happen.

a reply to: Klassified

I don't think these are Dominion voting machines.

Mitch McConnell Received Donations from Voting Machine Lobbyists Before Blocking Election Security Bills www.newsweek.com...

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell squashed two bills intended to ensure voting security on Thursday, just one day after former special counsel Robert Mueller warned that Russians were attempting to sabotage the 2020 presidential elections "as we sit here."

McConnell said he wouldn't allow a vote on the bills because they were "so partisan," but, as previously reported, earlier this year McConnell received a slew of donations from four of the top voting machine lobbyists in the country.

"Clearly this request is not a serious effort to make a law. Clearly something so partisan that it only received one single solitary Republican vote in the House is not going to travel through the Senate by unanimous consent," said McConnell on the Senate floor.

Republican's knew about these machines. They didn't care.

Report says eight states to use paperless voting in 2020 despite security concerns thehill.com...

At least eight states are on course to use paperless voting equipment, or machines without paper records, as the primary polling place equipment during the 2020 elections, a report published Tuesday by New York University’s Brennan Center for Justice found.

The report said that around 12 percent of Americans, or about 16 million people, will vote on paperless machines in 2020 and will have no paper record of how they voted.

Many of these Americans will vote in the eight states that will use some form of paperless voting in 2020: Texas, Louisiana, Tennessee, Mississippi, Kansas, Indiana, Kentucky and New Jersey.

“Experts have longed warned that these machines are a security risk because they do not allow election officials or the public to confirm electronic vote totals,” the report’s authors wrote.

All of those states went to Republicans and Trump, save New Jersey.

a reply to: Boadicea

I believe it was Ben Franklin said something to the effect that sometimes half-truths are just big fat lies.

Exactly. As a computer tech and consultant who has been in the industry for many years, big tech's half-truths are big fat lies. I know what is possible in firmware and software, and so do a lot of other techs around the world thinking the same thing I am. When you tell us it can't be done, or isn't being done. We know your lying.

a reply to: Boadicea

They've just updated the software to change the vote without showing the change on the display - easy peasy.

a reply to: Sookiechacha
I'm not a Republican or Democrat, so it doesn't bother me to hold both sides accountable for a mess that could have been prevented years ago.

a reply to: Klassified

Both sides? It was Democrats that tried to push through a Bill that would protect voters. It was Republicans that squashed that bill, and Republican states that chose to use voting machines that were known to manipulate voters' votes, except New Jersey.

originally posted by: ManSizedSquirrel

Were those Dominion machines in Antrim County, Michigan?

Yes, they were Dominion machines.

If they were then Michael Steele would be incorrect. I do understand that the official line is "human error" due to a clerk not updating the software (good way to pass the buck) but this most definitely happened.

Not to quibble with you, because I agree wholeheartedly, but that's because we're not trying to gloss over those pesky facts like Michael Steele is being paid to do. And technically, he's right. The machines don't do anything unless and until the software tells the machine what to do.

If/when the fraud allegations are substantiated, I expect that Dominion (the hardware) will blame SmartMatic (the software), and SmartMatic will blame the election officials operating the systems, and the election officials will blame both Dominion and SmartMatic. It has all the makings of a perfect storm.

The challenge will be to provide evidence that all parties were working together.

Regardless of what ones opinion is on this whole situation, we need to at the very least acknowledge that this can and did happen.

Yes!

We also need to establish that We The People are entitled to know all the whys and wherefores. We are entitled to demand audits, investigations, transparency and accountability.

Little spooky that I literally saw this last night too and debated posting about it.

Let me guess, YouTube recommendations?

a reply to: Boadicea

The voting machine in the OP, which changed the voter's choice, a is paperless voting machine machines. Michigan used paper ballots, not paperless voting machines.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Klassified

Both sides? It was Democrats that tried to push through a Bill that would protect voters. It was Republicans that squashed that bill, and Republican states that chose to use voting machines that were known to manipulate voters' votes, except New Jersey.

Can we see the actual Bill language that "protects" voters (aka "ALL" voters) ❓🚨

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Boadicea

I voting machine in the OP, which changed the voter's choice, a is paperless voting machine machines. Michigan used paper ballots, not paperless voting machines.

I'm not sure the distinction you're trying to make... so I'll clarify myself instead!

I didn't mean to say the machine in the OP video was Dominion. I really don't know.

I do know and did mean to say that the machines used in Antrim County for this election are Dominion (as verified by the Michigan.gov website).

a reply to: Sookiechacha

"Paper" ballots still need a machine with software that tally the "counts" 🌑

a reply to: Boadicea
I totally agree with you as I hadn't considered reading his words in the same manner as you did. I think you may have opened my eyes even more to this.

a reply to: Boadicea

I'm not sure the distinction you're trying to make...

The voting machines in the OP were known to change the voter's chosen candidate, and then tabulated the results. The Dominion software scanned paper ballots and tabulated the results of the paper ballots. There is a paper trail of true votes in Michigan, whereas, the states that used paperless voting machines, like in OP, have no paper trail and no way to tell if the votes were true.