Do you believe Sydney is still a nut after watching this cnn video

This is no longer a partisan issue I completely agree with you. And if anyone values their own voice and our rights to be partisan hacks then they need to open their eyes and unite to defend that right. That way we all can continue flaming eachother in years to come without the game being fixed and our views not mattering.

The american people are one voice some of us are low and gutteral and some of us are high pitched and shrill, but in unison we are much much louder.

originally posted by: tinktinktink
a reply to: Annee

Anne, it is no longer about Trump or Biden it America against their elections being fixed. Watch the video read the second link. Put you goggles down. Atleast any true thinker should be questioning why wasnt this fixed in 2006 or before. Would we have endured endless wars ect.

I’ve been doing this a long time. Started around 1996.

For instance, there used to be a site called Bush Bones. You know, Poppy Bush, head of the CIA, member of the Bilderbergers, where the “bodies” were buried, yadda, yadda.

Nothing ever happened, nothing materialized. All this “proof” and nothing.

So, words are just words — real proof is tangible — if it stands up in a court of law. Not chastised by the judge and tossed out.

a reply to: benzanato

I truly think Biden did win this...(barely) but I think when Trump was winning that night by huge margins. That the dems and their buddies freaked. So they made sure they won it.

I have considered this same scenario. They might have panicked prematurely, and it was just a little too hasty and a little too reckless, and they got caught.

What has happened since has terrified me. I’ve read as many affidavits as I could find, there’s tons of videos from people who have shown all the discrepancies in places like Pennsylvania etc. then I discovered the article I posted and to be immediately banned for sharing it??? What’s there to hide?

Apparently, there is plenty to hide... probably much more than we are even aware of at this point. Much more than the sworn affadavits by eyewitnesses. Probably much more than dodgy election laws that were illegally tweaked by governors and election officials.

And the guilty parties will be found on both "sides." It's not just Dems and Team Biden. There's plenty of guilty to go around. (I'm side-eyeing Mitch McConnell in particular...)

a reply to: Annee


I agree with you about Bush I thought he was the biggest murderer in modern history. But this is not a Bush thread and the world is watching the banner of freedom. Answers will be needed as evidence and folks see the connecting dots over time. For example, Mitch McConnell blocking election security funding in 2016 or Obama neutering the media in 2012 without so much as a shrug from the republicans. Or texas blocking the ballot machines failing them by unanimous bipartisan for the last 10 years with a total of 3 rejected certs with 16 bipartisan inspectors rejecting it. I am sure there are other brow-raising dots out there excluding whatever Sydney has in terms of evidence and she seems very confident.

originally posted by: tinktinktink
a reply to: Annee


I agree with you about Bush I thought he was the biggest murderer in modern history. But this is not a Bush thread and the world is watching the banner of freedom. Answers will be needed as evidence and folks see the connecting dots over time. For example, Mitch McConnell blocking election security funding in 2016 or Obama neutering the media in 2012 without so much as a shrug from the republicans. Or texas blocking the ballot machines failing them by unanimous bipartisan for the last 10 years with a total of 3 rejected certs with 16 bipartisan inspectors rejecting it. I am sure there are other brow-raising dots out there excluding whatever Sydney has in terms of evidence and she seems very confident.

I wasn’t talking about Bush — that was just an example.

I was talking about real, legitimate, tangible, proof — that will hold up in court.

So far, it hasn’t.

We’ve seen pages and pages and pages of claims of proof. Still nothing.

a reply to: Annee

One day when the republicans are tired of getting cheated and decide to start paying up to the media and people counting the polls, I have no doubt you'll be squealing from the rooftops about fraud. Just remember, if that ever happens, that we tried to fix it but the results went your way so exposing fraud wasn't even a blip on your radar.

originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: Annee

One day when the republicans are tired of getting cheated and decide to start paying up to the media and people counting the polls, I have no doubt you'll be squealing from the rooftops about fraud. Just remember, if that ever happens, that we tried to fix it but the results went your way so exposing fraud wasn't even a blip on your radar.

No. Like I said — been doing this a long time.

I’ve become pragmatic about it.

Don’t know why “people” keep trying to force emotions on me.

a reply to: Annee

I'm not forcing anything on you. I just know that if republicans committed fraud on such a level as this then you'd be wanting to get to the bottom of it, and rightfully so. I'd leave them behind if I ever caught them buying votes like this on such an insane level.

a reply to: Annee

So you don't think the video of CNN confirming what Sydney is saying is real?

originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: Annee

I'm not forcing anything on you. I just know that if republicans committed fraud on such a level as this then you'd be wanting to get to the bottom of it, and rightfully so. I'd leave them behind if I ever caught them buying votes like this on such an insane level.

Prove fraud first.

Then discuss levels.

originally posted by: tinktinktink
a reply to: Annee

So you don't think the video of CNN confirming what Sydney is saying is real?

What exactly is she saying?

And what tangible stuff does she have to back it up?

a reply to: Annee

How do you prove fraud with a corrupt justice system?

Many local justice systems are rife with fraud, what makes you think it's not at a national level?

I have read some of your posts that discussed leaving organized religion. I've always had a problem with the way certain sects of Christianity operate on such an authoritarian level. Do you not see the similarities in progressive leadership? Honestly Annee, they are the new organized religion. They tell you what to think, how you should feel, and you are totally ostracized from their communities if you don't believe as they do. You really don't see the same controlling behavior?

a reply to: klimitzgus

Read this from Sydney.


"Georgia is probably going to be the first state I'm going to blow up ... and Mr. Kemp and the Secretary of State need to go with it because they're in on the Dominion scam. ... Another benefit Dominion was created to reward is what I would call election insurance, that's why Hugo Chavez had it created in the first place. I also wonder where he got the technology, where it actually came from because I think it's him or ... the CIA."

Notice these words: probably, think.

Probably not “is”

Think not “know”

originally posted by: klimitzgus
a reply to: Annee

How do you prove fraud with a corrupt justice system?

Many local justice systems are rife with fraud, what makes you think it's not at a national level?

I have read some of your posts that discussed leaving organized religion. I've always had a problem with the way certain sects of Christianity operate on such an authoritarian level. Do you not see the similarities in progressive leadership? Honestly Annee, they are the new organized religion. They tell you what to think, how you should feel, and you are totally ostracized from their communities if you don't believe as they do. You really don't see the same controlling behavior?

The masses are gullible. That’s nothing new.

Election fraud is also not new.

But, this is about a massive, systematic, pre-planned fraud.

Sorry, but the majority of voters are sick of Trump, and simply want him gone. No conspiracy.

He lost because he’s a self-serving, narcissist _____________.

———————

And — I do not have a nostalgic bone in my body. I do not live in the past. I am not interested in a 14 year old video.

Computers are a programmable machine. We all know that. They also have checks and balances.

a reply to: Annee

Ok, Anna when you finally have the evidence slap you in the face and then its shown how it was done and you can inspect one of the machines yourself and you can find a time machine to go back and watch it happen in real-time I don't think you can come to a realist conclusion.

But if you finally find what you looking for to help you break your ideological grasp on things that are not real your welcome to join us all Americans need to condemn what evidence thus far suggests in unison so we have the right to have our own viewpoints.

originally posted by: tinktinktink
a reply to: Annee

Ok, Anna when you finally have the evidence slap you in the face and then its shown how it was done and you can inspect one of the machines yourself and you can find a time machine to go back and watch it happen in real-time I don't think you can come to a realist conclusion.

But if you finally find what you looking for to help you break your ideological grasp on things that are not real your welcome to join us all Americans need to condemn what evidence thus far suggests in unison so we have the right to have our own viewpoints.

You prefer I jump into the pool of “Conspiracy Speculation”?

I don’t think Prove Your Case — is out of line.

originally posted by: Stormdancer777
I don't think she is nuts, I still believe her, something deeper is happening.

Hopefully she succeeds in her quest to eliminate as much corruption as possible.

If so, shed be a fine first female potus.

a reply to: Annee

Anyone with an open mind can see there's fraud. Anyone.

originally posted by: HalWesten

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: HalWesten

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: tinktinktink

If the USA is so technologically capable, why isn't it building its own voting machines. Why doesn't it have its own high bandwidth mobile telephony? Why is it constantly buying all its tech goods from overseas manufacture?

Because shareholders demand profits over everything else and everything is made cheaper overseas. When shareholders took control of companies it started going downhill fast. I'm not against profits, I am against ruining a company and losing American jobs over a few bucks.

Consumers also go for the cheaper product, too.

The issue is the all-round non-competitiveness of American manufacture.

Of course we do, no one wants to pay more than they have to for anything, but a few decades ago we became a throw-away society, in part due to the low cost of replacing whole items instead of repairing existing ones. That's what really hurt us, the desire to have everything we want right now as cheap as possible (and we're not the only ones) and so on. But the real expose' of the Gordon Geckos of the financial industry happened in the 80s, that's when we found out there was such a thing as a corporate raider and it was rampant.

Can't say all of this without blaming unions either, they had a huge hand in it from the demand for too-high wages (wife's family were almost all union workers) and the corruption there from the thugs on the street to the union bosses stealing millions from the members. It all adds up, even with history in mind I don't think there has ever been this level of corruption world-wide at so many levels.

That is why the plan to isolate the US, place massive tariffs on trade , and to bring all manufacture into the country is ultimately economic fantasy.

Additional to that, there are resources that the US just doesn't have. Like Tantalum, without which, all those tiny chip capacitors are impossible.

In a world of trade tariffs, where the US absolutely needs those resources, and the seller can set any price they want, and they know it, how much do you think they will set the price at?

That one thing is the end of all US electronics industries based on photolithography and integrated circuits.

Similarly, say with steel production, yes you could bring the manufacturing back into the US. Along with the pollution that such production entails. But how long would it be to implement large scale Bessemer converters, iron ore and coke facilities to feed the steel making? 10 years is not an unreasonable time.

So for 10 years, the US would be without any steel products and with electronics they'd be driven back to using vacuum tubes - making America great again? More like steam-punk fantasy.

a reply to: LSU2018

So anyone who disagrees has a closed mind?