MI Has A Voting Head Scratcher

There are over 3,000 precincts where the presidential votes cast compared to the estimated voters from the SOS (Secretary of State) is 99% all the way up to 350%. Those kind of numbers don’t exist in the real world. So where did all those votes come from? 225K-400K votes highly questionable.


youtu.be...

Dead people are voting .

originally posted by: Meldionne1
Dead people are voting .

That is not enough. It feels like a red herring.

That is the only fraud angle that FOX is reporting with any consistency. We know FOX has flipped so that they stay on that and really only that, is where I become suspicious. Low hanging fruit...

The amazing thing is that they (the progressives) told us for months beforehand that this was EXACTLY what they were going to do. They were broadcasting it. I told people that they President would be backed into a corner where he'd have to challenge the outcome because it would be so obviously crooked that he could not morally just let it go.

The are brazen. They think they can win. I hope that Americans have the guts to stand against it, come what may.

originally posted by: Meldionne1
Dead people are voting .

In the U.P. us Yoopers do not really die, we are vampires and wearwolves. We can now vote because we do not have to go out in the sunlight to vote. Most of the vampires are batty as hell, and the werewolves howl at the moon at night when drinking. Great place to live if you are a little crazy at heart.

originally posted by: MALBOSIA

originally posted by: Meldionne1
Dead people are voting .

That is not enough. It feels like a red herring.

That is the only fraud angle that FOX is reporting with any consistency. We know FOX has flipped so that they stay on that and really only that, is where I become suspicious. Low hanging fruit...

I think there were democrat cats and dogs voting too.

originally posted by: Klassified

originally posted by: MALBOSIA

originally posted by: Meldionne1
Dead people are voting .

That is not enough. It feels like a red herring.

That is the only fraud angle that FOX is reporting with any consistency. We know FOX has flipped so that they stay on that and really only that, is where I become suspicious. Low hanging fruit...

I think there were democrat cats and dogs voting too.

When the stories of family pets getting voter registrations and/or ballots (can't remember exactly) the argument was that it didn't matter because the signature could never be verified.

Fast forward to election and they were not verifying signatures with any real scrutiny... so you might be right.

a reply to: FlyinHeadlock

Nothing to see here Lefties . Move along Move along

Statistical anonaly.

350% is well within the margin of error after all. To suggest otherwise would be totally crazy. Like when you’re building a bridge you can totally go 350% over the weight limit.

originally posted by: MALBOSIA
When the stories of family pets getting voter registrations and/or ballots (can't remember exactly)

This is untrue.

a reply to: FlyinHeadlock

More votes than voters = Vote Fraud.
Case closed.

a reply to: incoserv

I agree. I also want to add that this is the beginning. Everything up to this point has been laying the groundwork for the battle to come. It is going to be us against more than a rigged election. This has been a fight for the last four years because we have been taking out the low hanging bad fruit.

The battle with the real enemy is coming, and it's going to take all of us to fight it. It's economic warfare on the horizon. We will only survive as America through a selective foreign policy.

He didn't set this all up to lose.

Now he knows who his friends really are.

originally posted by: links234

originally posted by: MALBOSIA
When the stories of family pets getting voter registrations and/or ballots (can't remember exactly)

This is untrue.

Actually, according to AP, it is true.

apnews.com...

a reply to: deadlysyn

I didn't see anything about pets getting ballots in that article.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: deadlysyn

I didn't see anything about pets getting ballots in that article.

I don't think you see anything that you don't explicitly want to see .

Probably makes things like Facts, Statistics and over all Logic rather frustrating for you .

not to say the whole pet voting thing is a fact.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

But apparently you missed the part about a voter registration being sent to a cat that had been dead for 12 years? The OP in that comment chain mentioned "voter registrations and/or ballots (can't remember exactly)". The link I posted shows that a voter registration absolutely was sent to a dead cat. Or does the and/or part confuse you? The AP link that was posted shows that the "untrue" comment is blatantly incorrect.

a reply to: deadlysyn

An application is neither a registration or a ballot.

Besides, the article clearly states, he was a DemoCAT.

this is raycist! if you deny the 350% you are raycist. You don't want to be raycist do you?

a reply to: rickymouse

Fact!

a reply to: deadlysyn

You do realize that even if a dead pet receives a registration form they can't actually complete it because they're not able to meet the validation criteria.

A billion registration forms could be sent to dead pets, but none of them would actually be able to vote.

It's like with the claims of mail on voter fraud which forget that you can't commit that type of fraud unless you've already stolen the identity of the person whose name is on the ballot. And you'd be caught if that person were to try to vote themselves.