Trump lawyers release 234 pages of election fraud evidence

a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

But the authoritative new sources all agree, there is NO evidence of voter fraud!??????

How can this be true, I am guessing everyone one of these sworn affidavits must be a hoax.

Actually I doubt that any of these people are real, if they are real, Putin must have put them up to this as you know he is still pulling the strings here.

Lol man people are going to have a bad time as they inevitably realize that Trump won in a landslide of historic margins.

a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

.....and all truths will be used for legal prosecution of the guilty parties.

IF there are any 'guilty parties'.

That is still to be determined.

That you and many others seem to have already decided that there are 'guilty parties' without having a look at ALL the evidence with a clear and unbiased mind seems to just about sum it all up to me.

And you just can't grasp that can you?

originally posted by: highvein
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

People will still say there is no evidence. The Left doesn't care.

It's not they don't care. They know what they did.

It's their uncontrollable lust for power that over shadows their honesty,integrity, and doing the right thing.

a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

Affidavits are considered evidence in a court of law,

Then why isn't trump in jail for sexual assault?

and if someone lie in an affidavit they can get 5 years in prison for perjury

And yet none of the 29 people that signed those affidavits against trump are in jail.

I'm not attacking trump here just pointing out that maybe you and I don't really understand the legal standing of an affidavit.
How many affidavits do you think have been signed against hillary over the years.

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation

originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: network dude

At this moment they are a collection of individual allegations.
There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever of wholescale organised vote rigging co-ordinated by The Democratic Party.

Lets wait and see how these allegations face up to the rigorous investigation that they deserve.

I'm absolutely staggered that the US electoral process could be so frail and vulnerable to exploitation and manipulation.

Affidavits are considered evidence in a US court of law, if you have any sources that say affidavits are not considered evidence in a US court then now is your time to share those here.

-MM

Is it true that affidavit is a step up from accusation?

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: djz3ro

That's one of the inadmissible examples I was referring to, that will be tossed.

I'd be willing to bet that a lot of them are of a smiliar quality.

originally posted by: elementalgrove
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

Lol man people are going to have a bad time as they inevitably realize that Trump won in a landslide of historic margins.

I hope we can all come back on December 15th and laugh about this...

originally posted by: djz3ro
I'd be willing to bet that a lot of them are of a smiliar quality.

I'd bet that nearly all of them are going to get tossed, starting today.

a reply to: scraedtosleep

We will see if the evidence presented here hold up in the courts.

-MM

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
a reply to: scraedtosleep

We will see if the evidence presented here holds up in the courts.

-MM

You managed to ignore the question asked, regarding affidavits, why Trump isn't in jail if afdidavits are so infallible? Or why none of his accusers are in jail for lying on an affidavit?

And to think this could have all been avoided if Democrats didn't push the mail in Caronavirus voting process and just went out and voted like they do every other year. They could be walking away the clear winners with out all this election fraud stuff hanging over their heads.

Your not a lawyer are you? So you wouldn't understand the game being played.a reply to: djz3ro

a reply to: majik

And you are so you do?

originally posted by: majik
Your not a lawyer are you? So you wouldn't understand the game being played.a reply to: djz3ro

Didn't day I did, I have an interest in this whole process and am quite well read. Not really sure your point there fella?

a reply to: djz3ro

I don´t know of that court case, but my initial guess that those affidavits did not hold up in court as evidence. Remember that it is up to the defendants lawyer to scrutinize the evidence presented by the prosecutor, then the jury or judge will make an evaluation on the evidence and decide if it is relevant or not.

-MM

Left is laser focused on "affidavits". It allows them to completely ignore the thousands upon thousands of votes from software glitches and the dozens of mailmen caught with ballots all over the country.

Iit might be so.a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: majik
Iit might be so.

Not with that vocabulary and it's an appeal to authority logical fallacy anyway.

C'mon man. These are sworn affidavits of Russian spies.

Duh.

USA TODAY - Nov 2 - Will your ballot be safe? Computer experts sound warnings on America's voting machines

Millions of voters going to the polls Tuesday will cast their ballots on machines blasted as unreliable and inaccurate for two decades by computer scientists from Princeton University to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.


To start with, the new gold standard for voting is paper.

Voters hand-marking their own paper ballots can verify their selection before the vote is counted by a machine. If the election is close or challenged, or if software fails, a paper ballot can be used to audit results. In 2018, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine declared that elections should be using human-readable paper ballots by this year – and voting equipment without such ballots should be removed as soon as possible.

If the Votes are Legal and Good - Then what does it hurt to look and see if the totals are Accurate ? Whats the Rush ?