Another USPS employee report election fraud

originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

Let me know when this is used to get a guilty plea in a court.

Until then it's just he said , she said.

The courts will decide about that, we´ll see once the trials starts.

-MM

originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: Grimpachi

I believe the first one has come out and said it was a hoax or something to that effect.

Link?

page 1

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Grimpachi

As much as your posting, you could have taken the time to find and quote actual facts? No?

I posted it almost 8 hours ago. Plenty of time for you to listen to it yourself.

If anyone is too lazy to do your own diligence contact me with a PM. I will give you a Patreon link where you can pay me for my time upfront. 2-hour recording that you want spoonfed time stamps. 40$ will cover it.

a reply to: Grimpachi

I watched the two hours yesterday and did not find any place where he recanted his claims of election fraud, and no one else here says they have found it either - I think you´ll have to help us out here by telling us exactly where in the 2 hour video he recants.

Much appreciated.

-MM

a reply to: Flatcoat

The Washington Post says he recanted, he says he didn't. It's setting a very dangerous precedent when the WaPo can publish any old crap without evidence and people just assume it's true,

Bwaaaaaa. Maybe they learned it from all the left biased MSM manufactured lies that have been told the last 5 years? Just a thought....Russia, Russia, Russia

You were probably all onboard with that # I imagine.

a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

Instead of saying I don't believe you, I will offer my help. Not only will I listen to it again and give you time stamps where he recants his story you will also get access to my buddies web novel for this month. $40 will cover my time. If you agree let me know and I will send you the Patreon address. Payment upfront.

a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

How could they know which mail-in ballots were for Trump and which were for Biden????

a reply to: MerkabaMeditation
Yes, thank you. Did that video present for us to hear, that recording he has said he made during the interview with authorities? If so , I must have missed that. Hearing that would make it so much easier for a guy like me to take him seriously instead of having to consider him just one more weasel trying to get his fifteen minutes of fame.

edit. Here again from the Post, there was a recording made of his interview with federal authorities and from that recording is where the Post got those quotes on just what he did say.

Link

a reply to: Flatcoat

That is IF it is a lie. There are those of us who do not take the Post as gospel, rather take it as just one more source of information for our consideration. Do I believe the Post, nope, nor do I believe this guy when he is talking with Veritas.
As I have said earlier in this thread, let's hear his recording of the interview he did with authorities that the claims to have made.

edit. Here again from the Post, there was a recording made of his interview with federal authorities and from that recording is where the Post got those quotes on just what he did say.

Link

originally posted by: KansasGirl
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

How could they know which mail-in ballots were for Trump and which were for Biden????

They have machines where they can open and reseal them and you never know it.

I could have sworn I saw a news article the other day where Hopkins said he recanted only because the USPS agent scared him into doing so?

Wasn’t there a thread on it here? I know I made a post in one discussing the investigator who was speaking like a dumbass, “I’m not trying to scare you, but I’m trying to scare you. I’m a goat, I’m not a goat. Baaaaaaa, moooooo.”.

a reply to: Drucifer

The video is on page 1 of the thread and the investigator repeatedly tells him they can stop at any time that he wants to make sure that the statement is his and that he doesn't feel pressured. They handled him with such kid gloves that if he really did feel pressured then he must be a very special person.

a reply to: TerryMcGuire

Well since you think it's a crock of sh*t then you won't have a problem with an investigation to prove you're right, right?

a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

we'll see how long before this one backs off their testimony rather than face perjury

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

One postal worker would be , one postal worker.
Two postal workers would not be more postal workerS, it would be ''one more postal worker.''
It would take at least two more postal workers added to the first postal worker to make the claim of more postal workers true. And again, we have no word from the rest of the postal workers, only the one postal worker.

To repeat.

One postal worker is one postal worker
Another postal worker, a second postal worker would be ''another'' postal worker, not ''more postal workers''

Besides that, any thoughts on just why none of the other 30 or so postal workers and not come forth or at least gone to their union reps?

Do you twist and turn this much to seek out one thing wrong in the numerous lies pinned on Trump or do you keep it strictly based to the things you feel benefit your agenda?

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation

originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

Let me know when this is used to get a guilty plea in a court.

Until then it's just he said , she said.

The courts will decide about that, we´ll see once the trials starts.

-MM

Is there a date for the first trial yet?

a reply to: scraedtosleep

I don´t know, I have not heard anything.

-MM

a reply to: LSU2018

Sure, an investigation should take place. But that is the point ain't it? Did not the federal agency already interview this fellow? Didn't they ask him pertinent questions which were recorded and then became the basis of that Post article? Investigate yes. But it's been done. Done by the federal agency that Trump as president commands. And what they found was that his evidence was nothing more than at best ''hearsay''. So sure, investigate more....

a reply to: LSU2018

Goofus reply Mr.2018. I have no agenda. I"m an old man and likely will be long gone before any agenda I might have could come to fruition. And do I hold all all lies that are not pinned on Trump to the same scrutiny?

Why would I. Here on ATS are dozens of devout Trumpian sleuths intent on finding each and every lie that is concocted against Trump, that job is taken. But there is a dearth of posters here who want to hold the same scrutiny to Trumpian lies. So some of us must take up that mantle as you and others seem not to be up to the task.