It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MykeNukem
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: MykeNukem
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: MykeNukem
Yes.
Or at the very least decriminalized...
NO
This allows traffickers.
That statement is referring to prostitution...
Do you think the girl who was trafficked deserves a charge? Of course not...
Now, if you would like me to unpack that statement...I do think it requires regulation....they are not mutually exclusive...
IMO — it needs to be treated the same as any legitimate business.
Arresting a prostitute that’s been trafficked — could save her life.
I think they could use the Escort business as a model. They'd have to add some health regulations and such...but would be a good model to start. Independent Contractors that pay taxes.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: MykeNukem
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: MykeNukem
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: MykeNukem
Yes.
Or at the very least decriminalized...
NO
This allows traffickers.
That statement is referring to prostitution...
Do you think the girl who was trafficked deserves a charge? Of course not...
Now, if you would like me to unpack that statement...I do think it requires regulation....they are not mutually exclusive...
IMO — it needs to be treated the same as any legitimate business.
Arresting a prostitute that’s been trafficked — could save her life.
I think they could use the Escort business as a model. They'd have to add some health regulations and such...but would be a good model to start. Independent Contractors that pay taxes.
There are plenty of models around the world where prostitution is legal.
I don’t see why we’d have to have a “one fits all”.
Performers may engage in sex as part of their roles, but that does not count as sex for hire. Sex in the course of creating a movie or a photo is an expression protected under the First Amendment. Generally, the one paying for the sex is also different than the one receiving the benefit of that act, further distancing it from a strictly sex-for-money arrangement. However, some free-speech advocates argue that even first-person movies should be afforded this protection, though no significant cases have gone to court.
originally posted by: MykeNukem
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: MykeNukem
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: MykeNukem
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: MykeNukem
Yes.
Or at the very least decriminalized...
NO
This allows traffickers.
That statement is referring to prostitution...
Do you think the girl who was trafficked deserves a charge? Of course not...
Now, if you would like me to unpack that statement...I do think it requires regulation....they are not mutually exclusive...
IMO — it needs to be treated the same as any legitimate business.
Arresting a prostitute that’s been trafficked — could save her life.
I think they could use the Escort business as a model. They'd have to add some health regulations and such...but would be a good model to start. Independent Contractors that pay taxes.
There are plenty of models around the world where prostitution is legal.
I don’t see why we’d have to have a “one fits all”.
Where did I mention anything about one size fits all?
That's twice now you have attributed words to me, that I didn't say...
I would think the term “Independent contractor” in my post, sort of makes your reply a little redundant, no?
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: JAGStorm
Misplaced morality springs to mind.
Religion also plays its part aka The Holy Roman Church of St Peter depictions of Mary Magdalene being a prostitute.
originally posted by: MapOfNowhere
Prostitution should absolutely be legalized. Just like all drugs and euthanasia.
And why "2 consenting adults" it can be 3. Or 4. Or 20. If they are adults, and both or all participants are consenting, and money is involved, then so what? It should be no business of the government and their lawmakers.
originally posted by: tinktinktink
a reply to: MapOfNowhere
In the past few decades we have an epidemic of children being born into single parent families and becoming a burden on the tax payer to take care of the family. Prostitution as a profession may or may not cause a further exacerbation of this problem.
In recent years personal responsibility and consequences for actions have been diminished by laws that encourage irresponsibility and further cause the men to be treated as the sole party of guilt in nsa relationships and hookups when financial responsibility can be given.
Without legal protections to the consumer and tax payer I feel like this will back fire in the face of every tax payer and consumer.
The same goes for drugs that have dependencies such alcohol, heroin, meth, opioids and become burdens to the tax payer due to irresponsible personal decisions.
originally posted by: tinktinktink
a reply to: MapOfNowhere
In the past few decades we have an epidemic of children being born into single parent families and becoming a burden on the tax payer to take care of the family. Prostitution as a profession may or may not cause a further exacerbation of this problem.
In recent years personal responsibility and consequences for actions have been diminished by laws that encourage irresponsibility and further cause the men to be treated as the sole party of guilt in nsa relationships and hookups when financial responsibility can be given.
Without legal protections to the consumer and tax payer I feel like this will back fire in the face of every tax payer and consumer.
The same goes for drugs that have dependencies such alcohol, heroin, meth, opioids and become burdens to the tax payer due to irresponsible personal decisions.
As others have stated, women often prostitute themselves out now under different legal scenarios. Hot 30 something marries a 70 year old billionaire... no one says that is a prositute when she is clearly in it for the money. Girl wants a nice dinner before letting a guy hit it, that is just a date. Film two people getting it on and pay then a few hundred bucks, that is making a movie.
originally posted by: JAGStorm
originally posted by: Annee
YES
Legalized and regulated.
Why are so many people against it?
I seriously wonder. They claim morality, but we all know
it is happening.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: JAGStorm
You start this topic now after all your ranting the other day about people who want to celebrate the holidays with their families?
Soooo, you are all for letting strangers get up close and personal face to face, swapping body fluids, but families cannot meat to celebrate holidays in one home, you know because grandma will die.
originally posted by: tinktinktink
a reply to: MapOfNowhere
In the past few decades we have an epidemic of children being born into single parent families and becoming a burden on the tax payer to take care of the family. Prostitution as a profession may or may not cause a further exacerbation of this problem.
In recent years personal responsibility and consequences for actions have been diminished by laws that encourage irresponsibility and further cause the men to be treated as the sole party of guilt in nsa relationships and hookups when financial responsibility can be given.
Without legal protections to the consumer and tax payer I feel like this will back fire in the face of every tax payer and consumer.
The same goes for drugs that have dependencies such alcohol, heroin, meth, opioids and become burdens to the tax payer due to irresponsible personal decisions.
originally posted by: Edumakated
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: WildBillX
originally posted by: JAGStorm
kfax.com...
According to Life Site News, the 2020 presidential hopeful said that despite her previous crack down on sex work when she was California’s Attorney General, she would like to see prostitution – between two consenting adults – decriminalized.
“When you are talking about consenting adults, I think that, you know... yes. We should really consider that we can’t criminalize consensual behavior as long as no one is being harmed.”
Let's not get into the nasty bits of this, and focus on the legality.
I'm all for it. I grew up in countries where it was legal and it sure seemed to be fine.
Let's not kid ourselves either, legal or not people will do it. I personally think it will benefit women & may
possibly stop some human trafficking's.
Legalized but regulated is ideologically incoherent.
What do you think legalized and regulated means?
I think he is trying to say that if you legalize it, there shouldn't be any regulations. A bit of an extreme position.
Even though I am libertarian (generally), I don't think anyone believes there shouldn't be regulations of any kind. The question is how much regulation is necessary to ensure a free and functioning market where consumers are protected but business isn't hamstrung either.
I don't think it is all that complicated. The problem is you can't regulate away stupidity or criminal intent. It is kind of like with product warnings. No matter how safe you make something, nature always builds a better idiot.