Former Giuliani associate raises questions about Hunter Biden’s ‘hard drive from hell’

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Q agrees.

Lol

Why is QAnon more obsessed with
an imaginary sex-trafficking ring than with
Jeffrey Epstein’s REAL ONE ?

news.yahoo.com...

originally posted by: ToneDeaf

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Q agrees.

Lol

Why is QAnon more obsessed with
an imaginary sex-trafficking ring than with
Jeffrey Epstein’s REAL ONE ?

news.yahoo.com...[/quo te]















could it be that Epstein is dead?

edit on 25-10-2020 by network dude because: (no reason given)

originally posted by: network dude
could it be that Epstein is dead?

So you want us, to actually believe that he killed himself?
. . . must be Giuliani's agent
BTW Qanon comes from 4chan
a place known for hosting child porn

a reply to: gortex
I think this is the same guy the Media said was a "disgraced indicted" associate of Rudy Giuliani for the past year, at least.

If so, what made them removed "disgraced indicted" from the titles all of a sudden?

Lev Parnas is once again their shining beacon of hope, as he was in early days of the Mueller witch-hunt?

originally posted by: ToneDeaf

originally posted by: network dude
could it be that Epstein is dead?

So you want us, to actually believe that he killed himself?
. . . must be Giuliani's agent
BTW Qanon comes from 4chan
a place known for hosting child porn

Clearly you don't know anything about 4chan.
It is a anonymous message board, not a person.
CP is removed and will get you a permaban.
Quit spreading your false opinions.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Omg. Lmao. The sad thing is, as more outlandish and "just discovered" evidence comes, it really takes away from the probable real info. Seems like some are sabotaging their own case.

I'm inclined to agree. Even if this is true, it's super low hanging fruit. exposing troubled kids and family issues that aren't about the criminality of selling the family name just seems like that disinfo I was discussing earlier.

I think enough has surfaced that if it was to be reported on, it would be enough to sufficiently sink Joey. Why not just concentrate on getting the vetted info out.

Some might argue evidence that a Presidential candidate engaged in "Not appropriate" behavior in the shower with his daughter...is also as important as evidence that a Presidential candidate sold his influence to foreign powers through his family.

BOTH situations will compromise a future President to foreign powers and others.


Two points on the daughter's incriminating journal...
It was written by her as a adult...recalling a traumatic "not appropriate" sexual encounter with her father.

It is as valid as any recollection of past sexual abuse episodes recorded, heralded or highlighted throughout the #MeToo movement.

originally posted by: ToneDeaf
originally posted by: IAMTAT
Q agrees.

Lol

Why is QAnon more obsessed with
an imaginary sex-trafficking ring than with
Jeffrey Epstein’s REAL ONE ?

news.yahoo.com...




My guess...
Bidens are taking a diving for Podesta, Clintons, Epstein and the system.
Along with our economy and the airborn media aids virus.

a reply to: network dude

Epstein being dead is kinda irrelevant.
The real question is..

Who went to the island, and whom of that group are still in a power position... in anything?
We can't have mossad honeypot'ed politicians and industry leaders in our country.
It's a much bigger issue to national security than the optics of the Clintons being sleazy.

originally posted by: ToneDeaf

originally posted by: network dude
could it be that Epstein is dead?

So you want us, to actually believe that he killed himself?
. . . must be Giuliani's agent
BTW Qanon comes from 4chan
a place known for hosting child porn

that's exactly what I said, isn't it?

Epstein was murdered to keep the kiddie sniffers safe. the real problem is how many of our powerful élite are kiddie sniffers.

I don't do Q and I don't do 4 chan. Is there anything else you would like to project on me? Looking foolish seems to be a good look on you.

a reply to: IAMTAT

I just think the existing provable crimes are big enough by themselves to show what Biden is. With too much data, more will get lost in whataboutisms and idiotic comments.

I don't doubt Joe is a strange person with his sexual preferences. I just think his problems with selling out our country is a much, much bigger issue, what with him trying to be elected for the top spot.

originally posted by: Mandroid7
a reply to: network dude

Epstein being dead is kinda irrelevant.
The real question is..

Who went to the island, and whom of that group are still in a power position... in anything?
We can't have mossad honeypot'ed politicians and industry leaders in our country.
It's a much bigger issue to national security than the optics of the Clintons being sleazy.

This is the same issue we have with the MSM giving us factual news. Let he who hasn't diddled with kids cast the first stone.
and not a one stood up.

What's hilarious is that while Politico was trying to make this more or less meaningless point, they accidentally acknowledged that the laptop is indeed Hunter's.

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: IAMTAT


I don't doubt Joe is a strange person with his sexual preferences. I just think his problems with selling out our country is a much, much bigger issue, what with him trying to be elected for the top spot.

Kompromat is Kompromat.

Who supplied the lap tops, who held them, how long did they hold them etc. etc..
Listen very carefully, RULE ONE, when you want to cry false info attack the source. It doesn't matter how defaming the content, if you can discredit the source your half way to burying the content. That's the only rule you should be concerned with as of nearly all these posts are deflecting from the content.

originally posted by: Mandroid7
. . . will get you a permaban.

I will post my opinion whether you like it or not,
that is the meaning of democracy.
Sorry dude but . . .
Last I heard we were still living in a democratic
society, not in a communist country.
As for 'fake stories' . . .
If there was any REAL evidence of serious wrongdoing
then the CIA|FBI would be all over this,
making an arrest.
Other than that, the fake news is just
a bad attempt at a smear job and 'entertainment'.
But . . I did read over the internet, that they found
Barron's trumps diary. Oh my ! Lol

originally posted by: ToneDeaf

But . . I did read over the internet, that they found
Barron's trumps diary. Oh my !

Lol

That should be interesting considering how much the Left is whining about us ragging on Joe's ADULT son Hunter, who had corrupt dealings with his father and is therefore fair game.

I'm sure they will unabashedly go after Trump's minor son, who has nothing to do with anything, with no shame. I'm sure of that because they've done it before.

originally posted by: face23785
Hunter, who had corrupt dealings

Is that what the FBI-CIA said ? or what you say

Show us an OFFICIAL report of the charges or mute your 'stories'

originally posted by: ToneDeaf

originally posted by: face23785
Hunter, who had corrupt dealings

Is that what the FBI-CIA said ? or what you say

Show us an OFFICIAL report of the charges or mute your 'stories'

I don't need the FBI to tell me what to think. I can form my own conclusions from what's available in the public sphere. Check out the emails. Check out the business partner who has credibly alleged corruption of both Hunter and Joe. No serious person can look at that and come away thinking the Bidens aren't corrupt.

You're biased, of course, so you're not going to admit that, and I don't expect you to. You won't think otherwise until you're told to.

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: ToneDeaf

originally posted by: face23785
Hunter, who had corrupt dealings

Is that what the FBI-CIA said ? or what you say

Show us an OFFICIAL report of the charges or mute your 'stories'

I can form my own conclusions from what's available in the public sphere.
You're biased, of course

Official charges, arrest warrant Vs "conclusions from internet postings"
Oh my,
I believe you need to google the DEFINITION of bias
but then, that's my conclusion

Here is some critical-thinking to investigate >
Anatomy Of A Smear:
Questions Surrounding the Hunter Biden 'Story'
www.huffingtonpost.ca...

originally posted by: ToneDeaf

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: ToneDeaf

originally posted by: face23785
Hunter, who had corrupt dealings

Is that what the FBI-CIA said ? or what you say

Show us an OFFICIAL report of the charges or mute your 'stories'

I can form my own conclusions from what's available in the public sphere.
You're biased, of course

Official charges, arrest warrant Vs "conclusions from internet postings"
Oh my,
I believe you need to google the DEFINITION of bias
but then, that's my conclusion

Here is some critical-thinking to investigate >
Anatomy Of A Smear:
Questions Surrounding the Hunter Biden 'Story'
www.huffingtonpost.ca...

I love how you question me drawing conclusions from "an internet posting" and then try to refute me with an internet posting.

And that is not the only source of my conclusions. You're ignoring Biden's former business partner.

Of course you are ignoring that. You weren't told to think about it.

Try thinking for yourself for once. Letting HuffPost do your thinking for you really is not gonna help you intellectually.