It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Absolute Proof the Earth is Round NOT Flat!
page: 198share:
originally posted by: Crazierfox
Posting theorems are not proof they are theoriesl.
Which has what to do with the measurable dip of the horizon
originally posted by: Crazierfox
Show a photo of the blue marble, obelisk, spheriod whatever thay wanna gaslight you into believing that decde that is not CGI
You keep changing the subject to something my argument don’t use or rely on.
edit on 26-1-2024 by Lazy88 because: (no reason
given)
The title of this thread is absolute proof and you said it's proof the earth is round.
I said how about some pictures of the earth that are not computer generated images it is now page 198 and no pictures of the earth that are not computer generated have been posted. This thread has proven jack and what gets flushed down the toilet.
If you cannot see why posts are relevant that's an issue on you
No rebuttals to the videos says it all
It's tough when your entire lol pun intended worldview is shattered
No one wants to be a flat earther fully aware and pointing it out again
but pictures of a floor wth is that supposed to prove? Nothing unless provided the construction dimensions, amount of sinkage, what materials used etc . I see nothing but a picture of a hallway that maybe level mabe its tilted could a video of a ball on that specific hallway from all different vantage points be posted for credibility sake. Can you prove there are no magnets present in said photos.
a reply to: Lazy88
I said how about some pictures of the earth that are not computer generated images it is now page 198 and no pictures of the earth that are not computer generated have been posted. This thread has proven jack and what gets flushed down the toilet.
If you cannot see why posts are relevant that's an issue on you
No rebuttals to the videos says it all
It's tough when your entire lol pun intended worldview is shattered
No one wants to be a flat earther fully aware and pointing it out again
but pictures of a floor wth is that supposed to prove? Nothing unless provided the construction dimensions, amount of sinkage, what materials used etc . I see nothing but a picture of a hallway that maybe level mabe its tilted could a video of a ball on that specific hallway from all different vantage points be posted for credibility sake. Can you prove there are no magnets present in said photos.
a reply to: Lazy88
originally posted by: Crazierfox
Nope not that again
@todeotodeo140
1 year ago
If the Earth is 24,000 miles in circumference then that means that the curvature is eight inches per mile squared by the distance. So this is basically 20 miles out. The shoreline should be 524 feet below the line of site. 524 feet of curvature from point A to point B. It is 262 feet of curvature if in the middle to each side between point A and point B this island should not be in view of the earth was a ball 24,000 miles in circumference
Seriously makes me question whether I am talking to a real person or not
Same post for the entire thread debunked again I think like for the millionth time but I could be off by a millon.
Its hard to realize that everyone is just as spellbound as it is but when you realize who is casting the spell is when the
a reply to: Lazy883
Post something that isnt so redudant and blatantly false as the video proves again and not like totally disproven by my last few posts go ahead POST SOMETHING NEW BEEP BEEP BOOP You cant becuae well show you can firsl lol beep boop
The guy who made that video fails to take into account the fact (yes, historical & scientific fact) that nautical miles are longer than land miles.
the nautical mile — 1.852 kilometers — was introduced in the 15th century
Link to MIT engineer/actual scientist
It's amazing what you can learn, if you actually read actual science & actual history instead of relying on uneducated guys in YouTube videos.
Until you can link scientific Evidence based on real history - not one of your many posts "proves" anything at all.
edit on 26-1-2024 by lostgirl because: fixing link
edit on 26-1-2024 by lostgirl because: fixing quote
Until you can link scientific Evidence based on real history - not one of your many posts "proves" anything at all.
History is a set of agreed upon lies
Science are lies trying to make the cut
Safe and effective
See wha happened there your post was just obliterated by lol science lies
people die and some people worship them like deitys never thinking for themselves or at all for that matter
more his tory lies
Weapons of Mass Destruction
lotsa people died
See where I went there I just showed how the globalist lie you are spreading kills people maims people destroys everything
Go ahead and rebutt them
PROVE HOW SAFE AND EFFECTIVE the science jabs were
SHOW WHERE THE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUSTION were
Science history yea ok head in sand
a reply to: lostgirl
Today, maritime speed is determined by ultrasonic sensors or Doppler measurement, and the 30-second divisor in the rate equation has been replaced by 28. But the instrument for measuring a vessel’s speed is still called a log, and marine and aeronautical distances are still measured in nautical miles. “Maps used at sea and in the air are based on the earth’s circumference,” says Caballero. “Their scale varies with latitude, and the nautical mile, about 500 feet longer than the land mile, reconciles those differences.”
Gaslight much
a reply to: Crazierfox
The OP isn't about pictures of earth, computer generated or not.
It is about the flat earth model with the sun circling around at 6000 miles not being able to light up the bottom of clouds at less than 100 miles, yet that is what we see, when we see it setting.
How do you explain that?
The OP isn't about pictures of earth, computer generated or not.
It is about the flat earth model with the sun circling around at 6000 miles not being able to light up the bottom of clouds at less than 100 miles, yet that is what we see, when we see it setting.
How do you explain that?
edit on 26-1-2024 by daskakik because: (no reason given)
a reply to: Crazierfox
Well, since we are not proving anything.
This ship got lost on its way to that one Chinese city in the sky.
What I'm wondering is how the magnets keep it in the air since light doesn't bend around the curvature of the earth.
And don't pay attention to things like nautical twilight, because those don't exist.
The sun fell off its circular track, luckily its like 5 miles across, so they can just pick it up, so it doesnt do that to the clouds anymore.
This thread has proven jack and what gets flushed down the toilet.
Well, since we are not proving anything.
This ship got lost on its way to that one Chinese city in the sky.
What I'm wondering is how the magnets keep it in the air since light doesn't bend around the curvature of the earth.
And don't pay attention to things like nautical twilight, because those don't exist.
The sun fell off its circular track, luckily its like 5 miles across, so they can just pick it up, so it doesnt do that to the clouds anymore.
edit on 26-1-2024 by Degradation33 because: (no reason given)
originally posted by: Crazierfox
The title of this thread is absolute proof and you said it's proof the earth is round.
And you ignore the opening post. And are changing the subject from the opening post.
a reply to: Crazierfox
inspired by this thread. I created another thread on another site using my own pictures.
This picture was before the stated time of sunrise while the sun was below the horizon.
The brightest spot in the top photo was a shaft of light. Not the actual sun as it was still below the horizon. It created a hot spot for how my camera was adjusting exposure.
From the way the clouds are illuminated bottom up. To the way the lower clouds cast shadows upward. Just don’t get how a sunrise as seen is a product of FE. It shows the reality of spherical earth.
And related to the sun. Not only would the sun not set on a flat earth and become physically blocked from view by the horizon, the sun would have to visibly turn north and travel roughly parallel to the North American coast after passing California on a flat earth.
inspired by this thread. I created another thread on another site using my own pictures.
This picture was before the stated time of sunrise while the sun was below the horizon.
The brightest spot in the top photo was a shaft of light. Not the actual sun as it was still below the horizon. It created a hot spot for how my camera was adjusting exposure.
From the way the clouds are illuminated bottom up. To the way the lower clouds cast shadows upward. Just don’t get how a sunrise as seen is a product of FE. It shows the reality of spherical earth.
And related to the sun. Not only would the sun not set on a flat earth and become physically blocked from view by the horizon, the sun would have to visibly turn north and travel roughly parallel to the North American coast after passing California on a flat earth.
edit on 27-1-2024 by Lazy88 because: (no reason given)
a reply to: Crazierfox
Just the dynamics of the sun proves spherical earth. So your cgi crap is worthless in this thread.
Just the dynamics of the sun proves spherical earth. So your cgi crap is worthless in this thread.
a reply to: Lazy88
How do Flat Earth supporters explain an eclipse?
Surely if the earth was flat that shadow that is cast on the moon would be flat and not spherical?
FET is one of the most stupidest theories I've ever heard of and has been debunked time and time again.
But people would rather ignore facts and twist things to suit their set in stone religion based dogma
How do Flat Earth supporters explain an eclipse?
Surely if the earth was flat that shadow that is cast on the moon would be flat and not spherical?
FET is one of the most stupidest theories I've ever heard of and has been debunked time and time again.
But people would rather ignore facts and twist things to suit their set in stone religion based dogma
originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: Lazy88
How do Flat Earth supporters explain an eclipse?
Surely if the earth was flat that shadow that is cast on the moon would be flat and not spherical?
FET is one of the most stupidest theories I've ever heard of and has been debunked time and time again.
But people would rather ignore facts and twist things to suit their set in stone religion based dogma
Don’t ask. On the flat earth society forums it’s anything to people having a personal parabola to the sun and moon are projections on a dome.
Anyway. The forums are not moderated vary well, and suffer from bad topic shift. And petty arguments have broken out between the people that support spherical earth, with some bad cases of trolling.
a reply to: daskakika reply to: Freeborna reply to: Lazy88
No need to
Caleb will
or
Flat out truth
No need to
Caleb will
or
Flat out truth
edit on 2024/28/1 by Crazierfox because: 
Just
saying
a reply to: Crazierfox
That didn't explain sunlight hitting clouds from below.
One was just about eclipses and the other about daylight not being sunlight.
What a waste of time.
That didn't explain sunlight hitting clouds from below.
One was just about eclipses and the other about daylight not being sunlight.
What a waste of time.
A waste of time to you but seriously this thread had provided endless hours of entertainment currently unable to stop laughting
Don't take it personal I only laugh because its way easier than crying and not gonna lie the stretches made to try to convince others or yourselves that the earth is a giant spinning. ball, obelisk. pear (depending on the year) hurling thru space at a speed we cannot achieve on our own all while seeing the same thing in the sky night after night. a reply to: daskakik
Yet y'all still think its round.
Some don't and a picture does not make it round
2007 The plan was accidentally published
Don't take it personal I only laugh because its way easier than crying and not gonna lie the stretches made to try to convince others or yourselves that the earth is a giant spinning. ball, obelisk. pear (depending on the year) hurling thru space at a speed we cannot achieve on our own all while seeing the same thing in the sky night after night. a reply to: daskakik
Yet y'all still think its round.
Some don't and a picture does not make it round
Brazilians who believe the Earth is flat are mostly men, often Catholics or evangelical Christians, and with relatively low levels of education, according to Datafolha.
But don't confuse education with knowledge, the Flat-Earthers warn.
"Flat-Earthers are the smartest. Write that!" says Anderson Neves, a 50-year-old entrepreneur, who has come to Ricardo's restaurant armed with a pamphlet denouncing the "hoaxes" of Newton and Copernicus.
"A malignant pseudo-science has corrupted the education system around the world," says another text he is carrying.phys.org...
2007 The plan was accidentally published
Strange but True: Earth Is Not Round
17 Pieces Of Indisputable Evidence That The Earth Is Flat
Checkmate, round earthers.www.buzzfeed.com...
a reply to: Crazierfox
I honestly don't care one way or the other but flat earthers usually go through great leaps to convince themselves and others.
They have no real proof for flat earth when all it would really take is a trip to the edge, even offer trips to the public to the edge for anyone who wants to know for sure.
I honestly don't care one way or the other but flat earthers usually go through great leaps to convince themselves and others.
They have no real proof for flat earth when all it would really take is a trip to the edge, even offer trips to the public to the edge for anyone who wants to know for sure.
edit on 28-1-2024 by daskakik because: (no reason given)
a reply to: Crazierfox
You know, I don't think anyone is going to take offense, because you said two plus two equals negative chicken salad.
I'll just assume you don't understand mass, centrifugal motion, basic Newtonian physics, or the concept of a sphere.
But laughing really doesn't hurt anyone like it use to. It's kind of an oddity now. Silly even.
Especially this:
It's funny BECAUSE people think it's proof or checkmate. It's actually kinda sad too. That image actually states people think the laws of physics say the oceans should fall away in a fixed direction because the earth is round. Without acknowledging that soccer ball-minded observation is an effect of gravity pulling things towards the center of said OBLIQUE SPHEROID. Not obelisk, those are tall and pointy.
And seriously never look up hydrostatic equilibrium either, because that's not at all important here.
It's good because it spreads laughter, I guess. Your laughing and posting things make me laugh and post things of equal condescension.
The cycle of baiting humor must be self-perpetuating with this topic.
A waste of time to you but seriously this thread had provided endless hours of entertainment currently unable to stop laughting
Don't take it personal I only laugh because its way easier than crying and not gonna lie the stretches made to try to convince others or yourselves that the earth is a giant spinning. ball, obelisk. pear (depending on the year) hurling thru space at a speed we cannot achieve on our own all while seeing the same thing in the sky night after night.
You know, I don't think anyone is going to take offense, because you said two plus two equals negative chicken salad.
I'll just assume you don't understand mass, centrifugal motion, basic Newtonian physics, or the concept of a sphere.
But laughing really doesn't hurt anyone like it use to. It's kind of an oddity now. Silly even.
Especially this:
Strange but True: Earth Is Not Round
17 Pieces Of Indisputable Evidence That The Earth Is Flat
Checkmate, round earthers.www.buzzfeed.com...
It's funny BECAUSE people think it's proof or checkmate. It's actually kinda sad too. That image actually states people think the laws of physics say the oceans should fall away in a fixed direction because the earth is round. Without acknowledging that soccer ball-minded observation is an effect of gravity pulling things towards the center of said OBLIQUE SPHEROID. Not obelisk, those are tall and pointy.
And seriously never look up hydrostatic equilibrium either, because that's not at all important here.
It's good because it spreads laughter, I guess. Your laughing and posting things make me laugh and post things of equal condescension.
The cycle of baiting humor must be self-perpetuating with this topic.
edit on 28-1-2024 by Degradation33 because: (no reason given)
Why can't anyone reach the edge of earth, and take a picture? Who put this dome over our heads, and why do we need it? If you can't reach the edge of
the earth and fall off. Why do we need a dome to keep us in? What is the dome keeping out? Couldn't who ever or what ever created the flat earth.
Created one without the need for a dome? What's the dome made of? What happens if it gets cracked, by say a nuclear weapon.
edit on 28-1-2024
by Unknownparadox because: (no reason given)
originally posted by: Crazierfox
I addressed Chicago and you ran from any rational discussion.
originally posted by: Lazy88
Refraction is well understood. And demonstrated with the Chicago skyline.
Why is it to see Chicago across Lake Michigan you have to claim a 200 plus foot tall hill, and you can only see the upper most part of the buildings. And what you can see changes day to day.
If the earth was flat, you should be able to stand on the shore across the lake and see most of the lengths of the Chicago buildings on any given day. Unless too foggy or rainy.
Skyline Skepticism: The Lake Michigan Mirage
www.abc57.com...
The distance from Warren Dunes state park is about 53 miles across the lake to Chicago. Someone that’s six feet tall standing on the lake shore can only see about three miles to the horizon. If you climb to the top of Tower Hill (250ft) you can see almost 20 miles to the horizon. That’s still not far enough to see Chicago, at least at ground level. The Willis (Sears) Tower is 1,450 feet to the top. Doing the same calculations you could see it from up to 65 miles away on Tower Hill.
That evening at the top of Warren Dunes, it was pretty exciting as the inversion was setting-up. It was a spring night, the lake waters were very cold and it even felt warmer on top of Tower Hill than on the shore. Looking out on the horizon, a dark line started to show-up just above it, that was the inversion. We could see the atmospheric “lensing” or refraction happening. Objects would appear and disappear, there were breaks in buildings or they’d appear upside down depending on how the atmospheric conditions were changing.
www.abc57.com...
What’s happening is the light from Chicago is being bent by the cold air above lake Michigan, slightly downward towards the observer here. That’s helping light rays get around the curvature of the earth, so that Chicago can be seen almost all the way down to ground level,” Dr. Rennie said.
But if it’s a mirage, argues many of the biggest critics that have emailed me, the image should be upside down?
www.abc57.com...
To those that doubt affects of refraction. The full Chicago skyline should be visible all the time if it weren't the case, barring clouds, rain or fog. However that’s not the case, it is always changing. I encourage anyone to go look for themselves.
www.abc57.com...
If you doubt refraction, are there really two ships in this video?
Crazierfox, are you capable of any logical debate on actual evidence. All you’re doing is spamming the thread with flat earth propaganda, casting insults, and avoiding the topic of the opening post.
edit on 29-1-2024 by Lazy88 because: (no reason given)
edit on 29-1-2024 by Lazy88 because: (no reason given)
a reply to: Crazierfox
So. You think that the human eye could detect being out of parallel by two inches at that distance.
flatearth.ws...
So. You think that the human eye could detect being out of parallel by two inches at that distance.
flatearth.ws...
edit on 29-1-2024 by Lazy88 because: (no reason given)
originally posted by: Crazierfox
17 Pieces Of Indisputable Evidence That The Earth Is Flat
Checkmate, round earthers.www.buzzfeed.com...
If this is meant to be some 'gotcha' moment it just shows how stupid some people are
A ball as in football when called flat means its deflated ie needs air, the actual shape of the ball in that picture would be classed as concaved, you know like a bowl, heres an experiment for you get a piece of flat glass and try and carry the same amount of water on it, guess what that doesnt hold water either, so that stupid meme actally shows by the same idiotic use of the English language that a 'flat' earth would not hold water, a concaved Earth would though you know like the picture
So perhaps the Earth is neither flat or globe but concaved instead....sarcasm