Absolute Proof the Earth is Round NOT Flat!

a reply to: TheSkepticGuy23

Go ahead and show 1 picture of earth not created by a computer

Orwellian video that tells me to go to a website to watch cartoons that show me the correct way to think
Anyone up for proving curvature?

[quote
Kaleb has some info watch and unlearn
a reply to: TheSkepticGuy23

196 pages and the opening post still proves the earth is spherical.

Funny how flat earther’s change the subject to personal attacks that people believe the earth is spherical because they are programmed while ignoring people can prove the earth is spherical. While flat earther’s themselves use blatant YouTube lies and propaganda.

If you think the earth is flat, then drawn out and post how a lunar eclipse works on a flat earth.

a reply to: Crazierfox

The flat earth has been debunked for decades.

originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: turbonium1

Far greater minds than mine have tried to convince you that the earth is spherical or an ellipsoid with rather compelling proof and evidence.
But hell, I'll give it another shot.

Please explain this picture of Thorntonbank Wind Farm off the Belgium coast.

And could you also please explain for me why during a lunar eclipse we don't see a flat shadow of the earth across the moon's surface but in fact see a round shadow?
What are the mechanics of a lunar eclipse according to the flat earth model?

Flat Earth - Ships going over the Horizon in Perth Australia - P900

a reply to: muzzleflash

I'm sure some flatearther will come along to attempt to debunk your sunshine under clouds observation, if they haven't all ready.

I was told by a skydiver that the Earth is curved, if you want proof just skydive and see for yourself flatearthers.

a reply to: tachyonator9
Pretty easy to answer.



Oops now why should any1 pay attention to your rants.

a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

I know bull# when I see it smell it read it

Yup

Awaken slowly

originally posted by: Crazierfox
Yup

Awaken slowly

Well.

You can’t respond intelligently to individual thought out proof the earth is spherical that debunks flat earth such as the opening post.

All you can do is link to flat earth propaganda with no argument of your own. Like a person desperate to push the truth into the background.

You’re helping to kill flat earth.

a reply to: Lazy88
Pulease. How can anyone respond intelligently to a claim so ludicrous oh the earth is spinning super fast while traveling super fast circling a big light but for some reason it & all the other lights stay in the same place. Go ahead explain that.
Then prove curvature. There is nothing intelligent to discuss heliosexuals like all cult members follow blindly something without proof. Gonna show examples of curvature not going out of sight oops Nikon ruined that.
Responding a joke to a joke shows more intelligence than believing a joke is true.
Prove curvature, there has been a reward out for how long? Oh you can't use CGI to collect tho. Wonder why no 1 bas

originally posted by: muzzleflash

originally posted by: rom12345
a reply to: muzzleflash
Logic would say that if God had a navel he has born in Human or Animal form.
Unless he just adorns himself in navals for fashion reasons.

If God is everything than you Rom are a manifestation of that infinity.

So you are a facet of God.

Do you have a navel?

It's ok to personify God to make sense of our language but truly you must appreciate the vastness of the implications here. It goes way beyond ego/persona of a divine source.

That's a limitation we impose because we cannot open our minds.

This is why we say it's "the Invisible God" (and indivisible).

But it's invisibility is due to its overarching nature that encompasses all things and non things.

It's subtle and etheric, a substrate on which all substance relies.

Then your bible is wrong, where he is described as talking to people and hands on killing them. He is described as being angry and vengeful. All these are human traits which arise from our endocrine system, our life experiences as humans among other humans and our hardwired human brain.

If he has no navel, he sure seems to have a human brain, human neurotransmitters and human feelings which you would only develop if you evolved to stay alive amidst a dangerous environment.

An invisible, omnipotent being wouldn't need anger nor would it need to kill it's own creations for turning out unexpectedly wrong.

Nature is above all of this. It is a well working system of emergence and consequences with no personal opinions.

God and flat earth are both duds made up by those who are too lazy to learn or understand complexity.

originally posted by: Crazierfox
a reply to: Lazy88
Pulease. How can anyone respond intelligently to a claim so ludicrous oh the earth is spinning super fast while traveling super fast circling a big light but for some reason it & all the other lights stay in the same place. Go ahead explain that.

It’s called the heliocentric model and it explains the opening post where flat earth fails

originally posted by: Crazierfox
a reply to: Lazy88


Then prove curvature.

Like the opening post?

Or this post?

originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: turbonium1

Far greater minds than mine have tried to convince you that the earth is spherical or an ellipsoid with rather compelling proof and evidence.
But hell, I'll give it another shot.

Please explain this picture of Thorntonbank Wind Farm off the Belgium coast.

And could you also please explain for me why during a lunar eclipse we don't see a flat shadow of the earth across the moon's surface but in fact see a round shadow?
What are the mechanics of a lunar eclipse according to the flat earth model?

Or this post?

originally posted by: Lazy88
a reply to: Crazierfox

The flat earth has been debunked for decades.

originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: turbonium1

Far greater minds than mine have tried to convince you that the earth is spherical or an ellipsoid with rather compelling proof and evidence.
But hell, I'll give it another shot.

Please explain this picture of Thorntonbank Wind Farm off the Belgium coast.

And could you also please explain for me why during a lunar eclipse we don't see a flat shadow of the earth across the moon's surface but in fact see a round shadow?
What are the mechanics of a lunar eclipse according to the flat earth model?

Flat Earth - Ships going over the Horizon in Perth Australia - P900

a reply to: Crazierfox

If the mods allow the post…

Four cases together show beyond a reasonable doubt the earth is curved
www.theflatearthsociety.org...

a reply to: Lazy88
There is nothing but CGI proving space
A decent Nkon proves flat earth
Ask a pilot?
its all perspective and how far the eye can see, the curved eye that see's things curved.

no one has produced a photo of the marble, egg, or oblate spheriod (seriously enough gaslighting) that is not CGI because according to
Not A Space Agency it has to be CGI
Speaking of Gaslighting this one takes the cake .
How come the same stars appear no matter where we are in the rotaion ear etc?

I am skeptical of a society that spreads misinformation the guy above kind of does exactly what you claim the disinfo group is saying but it proves beyond any doubt that earth is

originally posted by: Crazierfox
a reply to: Lazy88
There is nothing but CGI proving space
A decent Nkon proves flat earth

Which has nothing to do with what I posed. And a camera can prove earth is spherical.

originally posted by: Lazy88
a reply to: Crazierfox

The flat earth has been debunked for decades.

originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: turbonium1

Far greater minds than mine have tried to convince you that the earth is spherical or an ellipsoid with rather compelling proof and evidence.
But hell, I'll give it another shot.

Please explain this picture of Thorntonbank Wind Farm off the Belgium coast.

And could you also please explain for me why during a lunar eclipse we don't see a flat shadow of the earth across the moon's surface but in fact see a round shadow?
What are the mechanics of a lunar eclipse according to the flat earth model?

Flat Earth - Ships going over the Horizon in Perth Australia - P900

Or this post

originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: turbonium1

Far greater minds than mine have tried to convince you that the earth is spherical or an ellipsoid with rather compelling proof and evidence.
But hell, I'll give it another shot.

Please explain this picture of Thorntonbank Wind Farm off the Belgium coast.

And could you also please explain for me why during a lunar eclipse we don't see a flat shadow of the earth across the moon's surface but in fact see a round shadow?
What are the mechanics of a lunar eclipse according to the flat earth model?

originally posted by: Crazierfox
Ask a pilot?

As in they will confirm the dip of the horizon because the earth is spherical.


flatearth.ws...

That gives a good means of calculating the curvature of the earth.

And can be verified.

Rainy Lake Experiment: Conclusion

walter.bislins.ch...

Summary

All data and observations agree with the predictions of the Globe Model, which includes Terrestrial Refraction. The predictions for the Flat Earth Model, however, contradict the observations.

The Rainy Lake Experiment shows even better than the Bedford Level Experiment that the earth is a globe, since we also have GPS measurements that are not influenced by Refraction or Perspective, but are of a pure geometric nature. GPS measurements directly provide the radius of the earth.

Only one conclusion remains:

The earth cannot be flat, but is a globe with a mean radius of 6371 km!

Anyway..

Conspiracy Theorist promises to concede, if I photograph the ISS ... So I did

Nope not that again

@todeotodeo140
1 year ago
If the Earth is 24,000 miles in circumference then that means that the curvature is eight inches per mile squared by the distance. So this is basically 20 miles out. The shoreline should be 524 feet below the line of site. 524 feet of curvature from point A to point B. It is 262 feet of curvature if in the middle to each side between point A and point B this island should not be in view of the earth was a ball 24,000 miles in circumference

Seriously makes me question whether I am talking to a real person or not
Same post for the entire thread debunked again I think like for the millionth time but I could be off by a millon.
Its hard to realize that everyone is just as spellbound as it is but when you realize who is casting the spell is when the
a reply to: Lazy883

Post something that isnt so redudant and blatantly false as the video proves again and not like totally disproven by my last few posts go ahead POST SOMETHING NEW BEEP BEEP BOOP You cant becuae well show you can firsl lol beep boop

originally posted by: Crazierfox
Nope not that again

@todeotodeo140
1 year ago
If the Earth is 24,000 miles in circumference then that means that the curvature is eight inches per mile squared by the distance. So this is basically 20 miles out. The shoreline should be 524 feet below the line of site. 524 feet of curvature from point A to point B. It is 262 feet of curvature if in the middle to each side between point A and point B this island should not be in view of the earth was a ball 24,000 miles in circumference

Seriously makes me question whether I am talking to a real person or not
Same post for the entire thread debunked again I think like for the millionth time but I could be off by a millon.
Its hard to realize that everyone is just as spellbound as it is but when you realize who is casting the spell is when the
a reply to: Lazy883

Post something that isnt so redudant and blatantly false as the video proves again and not like totally disproven by my last few posts go ahead POST SOMETHING NEW BEEP BEEP BOOP You cant becuae well show you can firsl lol beep boop

Refraction is well understood. And demonstrated with the Chicago skyline.

Why is it to see Chicago across Lake Michigan you have to claim a 200 plus foot tall hill, and you can only see the upper most part of the buildings. And what you can see changes day to day.

If the earth was flat, you should be able to stand on the shore across the lake and see most of the lengths of the Chicago buildings on any given day. Unless too foggy or rainy.

Skyline Skepticism: The Lake Michigan Mirage


www.abc57.com...

The distance from Warren Dunes state park is about 53 miles across the lake to Chicago. Someone that’s six feet tall standing on the lake shore can only see about three miles to the horizon. If you climb to the top of Tower Hill (250ft) you can see almost 20 miles to the horizon. That’s still not far enough to see Chicago, at least at ground level. The Willis (Sears) Tower is 1,450 feet to the top. Doing the same calculations you could see it from up to 65 miles away on Tower Hill.

That evening at the top of Warren Dunes, it was pretty exciting as the inversion was setting-up. It was a spring night, the lake waters were very cold and it even felt warmer on top of Tower Hill than on the shore. Looking out on the horizon, a dark line started to show-up just above it, that was the inversion. We could see the atmospheric “lensing” or refraction happening. Objects would appear and disappear, there were breaks in buildings or they’d appear upside down depending on how the atmospheric conditions were changing.
www.abc57.com...

What’s happening is the light from Chicago is being bent by the cold air above lake Michigan, slightly downward towards the observer here. That’s helping light rays get around the curvature of the earth, so that Chicago can be seen almost all the way down to ground level,” Dr. Rennie said.

But if it’s a mirage, argues many of the biggest critics that have emailed me, the image should be upside down?

www.abc57.com...

To those that doubt affects of refraction. The full Chicago skyline should be visible all the time if it weren't the case, barring clouds, rain or fog. However that’s not the case, it is always changing. I encourage anyone to go look for themselves.

www.abc57.com...

If you doubt refraction, are there really two ships in this video?

originally posted by: Crazierfox
L

Seriously makes me question whether I am talking to a real person or not
Same post for the entire thread debunked again I think like for the millionth time but I could be off by a millon.

Typical flat earth. Insult followed by changing of the subject.

Can you address the dip of the horizon.
Can you address the Rainy Lake experiment, how it too refraction in account, and confirmed the curvature of the earth.
Why do you ignore the ISS is an object orbiting overhead, can be photographed, and actively broadcasts as it passes overhead.

a reply to: Crazierfox

Something you may want to also read..

Yes, curvature can be measured and modeled as proven by Blackpool Photo

www.theflatearthsociety.org...

Now the point of all this. Blackpool tower looks relatively taller than the background hills because the earth is spherical.

I don't read disinfo sites
Now if you show me an AJ sight I may read it but come on you want me to go to the website started to discredit the infinite plane theory for proof nah gonna pass might as well go read some 1984 or stlin speeches just calling what it is.
Posting theorems are not proof they are theoriesl.
Show a photo of the blue marble, obelisk, spheriod whatever thay wanna gaslight you into believing that decde that is not CGI
197 pages in not once has this been done so I guess all the proof up to now is a theory which with and $2.50 you can buy an apple. Wash the apple in a bucket see if it floats. Then eat the apple and see if the core floats. Later when you defecate check to see if it floats. At that point you will have witnessed what all the pictures and world wizardry you have provided looks like without the picture.

OOPSY
Deny Ignorance
a reply to: Lazy88