It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Crazierfox
No, the goalpost hasn’t moved at all. An oblate spheroid is still round, it just isn’t perfectly round.
theories are always changing what about density
To find out whether general relativity is correct on large scales, we set out, for the first time, to simultaneously investigate three aspects of it. These were the expansion of the universe, the effects of gravity on light and the effects of gravity on matter.
originally posted by: Crazierfox
a reply to: Venkuish1
Sorry Round, prove it's round,without the mathematics made up during the plague or common core.
Even NOAA says it's always changing I posted the article above
Any Proofs not theories on any of this is welcome until then enjoy your journey through the center of the galaxy, I here Niburu's due back or is already here
theories are always changing what about density
To find out whether general relativity is correct on large scales, we set out, for the first time, to simultaneously investigate three aspects of it. These were the expansion of the universe, the effects of gravity on light and the effects of gravity on matter.
edit on 2024/6/2 by Crazierfox because:
Actually curvature is a mathematical concept if you are not aware of it. For more information you can look at concepts of differential geometry but a simple explanation of curvature is the amount by which a curve deviates from being a straight line or the amount by which a surface deviates from being a plane.
originally posted by: Crazierfox
a reply to: Venkuish1
Sorry Round, prove it's round,without the mathematics made up during the plague or common core.
Even NOAA says it's always changing I posted the article above
Any Proofs not theories on any of this is welcome until then enjoy your journey through the center of the galaxy, I here Niburu's due back or is already here
theories are always changing what about density
To find out whether general relativity is correct on large scales, we set out, for the first time, to simultaneously investigate three aspects of it. These were the expansion of the universe, the effects of gravity on light and the effects of gravity on matter.
edit on 2024/6/2 by Crazierfox because:
Thomas L. Friedman explains how the flattening of the world happened at the dawn of the twenty-first century.
The effect would be similar to spinning a bit of Silly Putty, though Earth's plasticity is much, much less than that of the silicone plastic clay so familiar to children."
Strange but True: Earth Is Not Round
Absolute Proof the Earth is Round
From the title
How does this work with the plates moving, the earth spinning, while orbiting "the Sun",at speeds never achieved by humans?
originally posted by: Degradation33
a reply to: Crazierfox
How does this work with the plates moving, the earth spinning, while orbiting "the Sun",at speeds never achieved by humans?
Well plates move a like 2 to 10 cm/year, so you don't have to worry about those.
But these are fun.
Earth spins at 1000 mph
Earth moves along its orbit at 67,000 mph
The solar system travels around the galactic center at 514,000 mph.
The Milky Way moves with the local group at 1,300,000 mph.
I would also like to post this live stream of that massive lie I uphold!
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg2
a reply to: BeTheGoddess2
This thread basically consists of a tiny number of flat-earth nutcases stating something silly, getting destroyed by people who have access to actual facts and then the FEN's screaming that the facts are wrong, wrong, WRONG! (And then imploding with silliness.)
It's been a loooong thread of nonsense.
More powerful lens?
And the first guy is using a regular camera, which isn't going to show Mars the way we've seen it through much more powerful telescopes. Of course they aren't going to look the same through a camera lens that they do through a telescope.
A New Study Appears to Stunningly Contradict Newton and Einstein's Theory of Gravity
But space is a big place, and even Einsteins sometimes meet their limit. One of the most well-known of these limits is a black hole’s center, or singularity, where Einstein’s famous theory appears to break down completely. Now, a new study from scientists at South Korea’s Sejong University suggests that another limit to Newton and Einstein’s conception of gravity can be found in the orbital motions of long-period, widely separated, binary stars—also known simply as “wide binaries.” The results of this study were published this month in The Astrophysical Journal.