It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Absolute Proof the Earth is Round NOT Flat!

page: 201
30
<< 198  199  200    202  203  204 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 6 2024 @ 06:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Crazierfox

No, the goalpost hasn’t moved at all. An oblate spheroid is still round, it just isn’t perfectly round.


Flat earthers and creationists seem to have major issues even with most basic definitions and terminology.



posted on Feb, 6 2024 @ 08:18 PM
link   
a reply to: Venkuish1
Sorry Round, prove it's round,without the mathematics made up during the plague or common core.
Even NOAA says it's always changing I posted the article above
Any Proofs not theories on any of this is welcome until then enjoy your journey through the center of the galaxy, I here Niburu's due back or is already here

To find out whether general relativity is correct on large scales, we set out, for the first time, to simultaneously investigate three aspects of it. These were the expansion of the universe, the effects of gravity on light and the effects of gravity on matter.
theories are always changing what about density



edit on 2024/6/2 by Crazierfox because:




posted on Feb, 6 2024 @ 08:33 PM
link   
a reply to: Crazierfox
This is daft, nobody made the claim it was perfectly round.

2nd.



posted on Feb, 6 2024 @ 10:47 PM
link   
a reply to: Crazierfox

It does change, but it's still a spheroid. The tides affect the shape slightly, as do movements of the tectonic plates, meteorite impacts, volcanic eruptions, etc. That doesn't mean that it isn't round, it isn't an ellipsoid, and it isn't an oblate spheroid.



posted on Feb, 6 2024 @ 11:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: Crazierfox
a reply to: Venkuish1
Sorry Round, prove it's round,without the mathematics made up during the plague or common core.
Even NOAA says it's always changing I posted the article above
Any Proofs not theories on any of this is welcome until then enjoy your journey through the center of the galaxy, I here Niburu's due back or is already here

To find out whether general relativity is correct on large scales, we set out, for the first time, to simultaneously investigate three aspects of it. These were the expansion of the universe, the effects of gravity on light and the effects of gravity on matter.
theories are always changing what about density



edit on 2024/6/2 by Crazierfox because:



Earth is an oblate spheroid (not a perfect sphere). There is nothing I have to prove to a flat earth believer ...

If you don't understand what an oblate spheroid is then perhaps you need some lessons in basic geometry.

So yes the earth is almost round and it's not a perfect sphere.

I will quote myself and you can what I said in my last reply to you.


Actually curvature is a mathematical concept if you are not aware of it. For more information you can look at concepts of differential geometry but a simple explanation of curvature is the amount by which a curve deviates from being a straight line or the amount by which a surface deviates from being a plane.


If earth was flat then its curvature would have been zero. But that's not happening (unfortunately for the flat earthers). If you want more information then it's better to look at what we call Gaussian Curvature.

Why do you insist by making a strawman argument? I don't see anyone claiming earth it's a perfect sphere and even if they did they would have been much more close to the truth than the flat earth 'theories' that have no basis in reality.

edit on 6-2-2024 by Venkuish1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 6 2024 @ 11:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: Crazierfox
a reply to: Venkuish1
Sorry Round, prove it's round,without the mathematics made up during the plague or common core.
Even NOAA says it's always changing I posted the article above
Any Proofs not theories on any of this is welcome until then enjoy your journey through the center of the galaxy, I here Niburu's due back or is already here

To find out whether general relativity is correct on large scales, we set out, for the first time, to simultaneously investigate three aspects of it. These were the expansion of the universe, the effects of gravity on light and the effects of gravity on matter.
theories are always changing what about density



edit on 2024/6/2 by Crazierfox because:



I don't know why you bothered to include a paragraph for what General Relativity is. But like I said earlier Gravity is nothing more than the curvature of space-time and the actual reason why celestial objects like planets and stars look like spheres.

Have you come across any flat planet or star?



posted on Feb, 11 2024 @ 08:39 PM
link   

He has a bunch more.
This is foreshadowing from a while ago

Thomas L. Friedman explains how the flattening of the world happened at the dawn of the twenty-first century.



A little while ago we were told we had 2 weeks to flatten the curve.
How does this work with the plates moving, the earth spinning, while orbiting "the Sun",at speeds never achieved by humans?

Even Khan gets it

edit on 2024/11/2 by Crazierfox because:




posted on Feb, 11 2024 @ 09:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Crazierfox

You do understand that Friedman is talking about globalization, and not an actual flat earth, right? He's talking about how trade is in a more level playing field.

And the first guy is using a regular camera, which isn't going to show Mars the way we've seen it through much more powerful telescopes. Of course they aren't going to look the same through a camera lens that they do through a telescope.



posted on Feb, 11 2024 @ 09:07 PM
link   
More Gas lighting

The effect would be similar to spinning a bit of Silly Putty, though Earth's plasticity is much, much less than that of the silicone plastic clay so familiar to children."

Strange but True: Earth Is Not Round

Absolute Proof the Earth is Round
From the title

a reply to: Venkuish1

edit on 2024/11/2 by Crazierfox because:




posted on Feb, 11 2024 @ 09:14 PM
link   
a reply to: Crazierfox


How does this work with the plates moving, the earth spinning, while orbiting "the Sun",at speeds never achieved by humans?


Well plates move a like 2 to 10 cm/year, so you don't have to worry about those.

But these are fun.

Earth spins at 1000 mph
Earth moves along its orbit at 67,000 mph
The solar system travels around the galactic center at 514,000 mph.
The Milky Way moves with the local group at 1,300,000 mph.



I would also like to post this live stream of that massive lie I uphold!

edit on 11-2-2024 by Degradation33 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 12 2024 @ 03:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: Degradation33
a reply to: Crazierfox


How does this work with the plates moving, the earth spinning, while orbiting "the Sun",at speeds never achieved by humans?


Well plates move a like 2 to 10 cm/year, so you don't have to worry about those.

But these are fun.

Earth spins at 1000 mph
Earth moves along its orbit at 67,000 mph
The solar system travels around the galactic center at 514,000 mph.
The Milky Way moves with the local group at 1,300,000 mph.



I would also like to post this live stream of that massive lie I uphold!


Ask any FE nutter about the bore and stroke of their disk earth is and they wont ansert, I want the numbes on this cylindrical world they made up. They gonna have to do more than circle jerk



posted on Feb, 12 2024 @ 03:41 AM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

Take a breakw, dont bang your head aganst a wall, i'm suprised this thread got this far. I' having a glass of wine for you.



posted on Feb, 12 2024 @ 05:29 AM
link   
a reply to: Crazierfox

Why is there a measurable dip to the horizon?



posted on Feb, 12 2024 @ 07:11 AM
link   
a reply to: BeTheGoddess2

This thread basically consists of a tiny number of flat-earth nutcases stating something silly, getting destroyed by people who have access to actual facts and then the FEN's screaming that the facts are wrong, wrong, WRONG! (And then imploding with silliness.)
It's been a loooong thread of nonsense.



posted on Feb, 12 2024 @ 07:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg2
a reply to: BeTheGoddess2

This thread basically consists of a tiny number of flat-earth nutcases stating something silly, getting destroyed by people who have access to actual facts and then the FEN's screaming that the facts are wrong, wrong, WRONG! (And then imploding with silliness.)
It's been a loooong thread of nonsense.


It’s more like they post a link to some FE propaganda and run? Seems more like an attempt to generate foot traffic to specific links?
edit on 12-2-2024 by Lazy88 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 18 2024 @ 02:00 PM
link   


And the first guy is using a regular camera, which isn't going to show Mars the way we've seen it through much more powerful telescopes. Of course they aren't going to look the same through a camera lens that they do through a telescope.
More powerful lens?
Are they natural or mechanical ie more amplified lens or using some sort of computer to view it?
a reply to: Zaphod58
I am aware of Friedmans reasoning for the use of the verbiage he chose.
If you look at another way it could be used to normalize the verbiage until it simply disapears. Like a cycle.
One day the world was flat the next it was round old phrase




posted on Feb, 18 2024 @ 02:18 PM
link   
But for some reason when you drop a rock it falls directly to the ground below it unless a strong wind?
At those speeds if you are throwing a rock it would be more powerful than a bullet if facing the correct direction or would smack you in the face in another.
I know there is a theory about why that does not happen but for over a hundred years its still a theory.
Accepted as law.
Hmm similar to mandates oh nevermind not gonna go there

huh

A New Study Appears to Stunningly Contradict Newton and Einstein's Theory of Gravity

You don't say

But space is a big place, and even Einsteins sometimes meet their limit. One of the most well-known of these limits is a black hole’s center, or singularity, where Einstein’s famous theory appears to break down completely. Now, a new study from scientists at South Korea’s Sejong University suggests that another limit to Newton and Einstein’s conception of gravity can be found in the orbital motions of long-period, widely separated, binary stars—also known simply as “wide binaries.” The results of this study were published this month in The Astrophysical Journal.


a reply to: Degradation33




posted on Feb, 18 2024 @ 02:20 PM
link   
a reply to: Crazierfox

Most telescopes, especially those used by backyard astronomers aren’t computer controlled. Some are for tracking purposes, so it’s easier to point in the direction of what you’re looking for, but the computer has nothing to do with the imagery.



posted on Feb, 18 2024 @ 02:28 PM
link   
I think a may have some sort of allergy to nuts so if you do not mind it's in my name just saying
FTR Started fe researching to find shaballah and currently going with the its a plane that appears cause time curved mentioned earlier in this thread and nothing posted by glo ball ism has change my mind.

a reply to: AngryCymraeg2




posted on Feb, 18 2024 @ 03:08 PM
link   
a reply to: Crazierfox

One day ancient maps said "Here be dragons".

Then explorers found otherwise.

It's called "progress"..?
edit on 18-2-2024 by Oldcarpy2 because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
30
<< 198  199  200    202  203  204 >>

log in

join