It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In addition to these criminal charges, the department has recovered, or assisted in the recovery of, in excess of $1 billion in assets for Malaysia associated with and traceable to the 1MDB money laundering and bribery scheme.
“Goldman Sachs today accepted responsibility for its role in a conspiracy to bribe high-ranking foreign officials to obtain lucrative underwriting and other business relating to 1MDB,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Brian C. Rabbitt of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division. “Today’s resolution, which requires Goldman Sachs to admit wrongdoing and pay nearly three billion dollars in penalties, fines, and disgorgement, holds the bank accountable for this criminal scheme and demonstrates the department’s continuing commitment to combatting corruption and protecting the U.S. financial system.”
MLARS’s Kleptocracy Asset Recovery Initiative, in partnership with federal law enforcement agencies, and often with U.S. Attorney’s Offices, seeks to forfeit the proceeds of foreign official corruption and, where appropriate, to use those recovered assets to benefit the people harmed by these acts of corruption and abuse of office.
originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: Justoneman
Oh yes - I was a baseball player in college at the Division 1 level. I know all about adjusting ones self while in full view of everybody. I celebrated it as a matter of fact. :-)
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: PilSungMtnMan
Who is "O" ?
mobile.twitter.com...
originally posted by: LanceCorvette
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: PilSungMtnMan
Who is "O" ?
mobile.twitter.com...
This and other recent releases are from 2017. Biden was a private citizen capitalizing on his prior government work.
Nothing illegal about that.
originally posted by: Trillium
Ok you know what to do
twitter.com...
originally posted by: Staffordshire1
originally posted by: Aallanon
a reply to: Staffordshire1
Maybe instead of complaining you could offer a better way?
My apologies for not being clear. I don't stand for what is dark, I stand for what is light.
A better way? As in America? That's not why I'm here. UK, Canada, France, Italy etc etc etc...that's not why I'm here. Humanity is why I'm here, who you here for? Trump? Trudeau? Yourself? The kids that want to commit suicide? Who you here for?
I've seen you flip flop more than the French during these threads. Where you at now? Funny your'e back where you started.
I'm not complaining at all just standing for all, those that know and them about to.
Like I've said I'm playing my part as you are in this.
What if I told you how to eradicate the terminal illness you have? You have a young child I believe? What if I (we) could give you another 20 years?
I'm offering to help you in the same way I'm asking you to help others. Mirror.
This post may be deleted, somebody save it and pm Aallanon.
Same side my friend just different perspectives
originally posted by: FlyingFox
Ya know...
The last ditch plan for Dems might be an Operation Valkyrie dealie where something bad happens to old Joe for the sake of gaining a sympathy vote. Kamala elevates to PotUS...kill two birds with one stone.
After the election
While it may seem odd for voters to cast their ballots for someone who has recently died, if the death should occur after the election, but before the electors cast their ballots on Elector Day, the onus will fall on the electors. Constitutionally, the electors are always able to exercise their judgement when they cast their ballots, though except on rare occasions, they always vote for whomever the presidential candidate is. In the event of a death, the party will choose an alternate candidate for the electors to vote for, and direct the electors to do so. The electors will have to make their own decision if they wish to stick with the party's choice or not.