Biden’s Texas Political Director Implicated in Massive Mail-In Ballot Harvesting

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: neutronflux
Maybe they need to reference a dirty dossier from Russian sources.

Or turn the 'evidence' over to authorities and post the videos. Until then this looks shady.

Why do you think control of the court system is so vital?

CRIMINAL JUSTICE
George Soros' quiet overhaul of the U.S. justice system
Progressives have zeroed in on electing prosecutors as an avenue for criminal justice reform, and the billionaire financier is providing the cash to make it happen.
By SCOTT BLAND 08/30/2016 05:25 AM EDT


www.politico.com...

a reply to: neutronflux

I'm glad you got the boogeyman into this but he really has nothing to do with this guy making a sworn statement to his own relative and then sitting on alleged videos.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: neutronflux

I'm glad you got the boogeyman into this but he really has nothing to do with this guy making a sworn statement to his own relative and then sitting on alleged videos.

It’s the bigger picture that is hard to see by some.

The democrat party rule by any means possible is a true conspiracy. Sorry you cannot see that.

And all actions and motives should be suspect by any elected or appointed government person regardless of party. But Soros sure leaves one hell of a money trail.

So you should trust government?

This cannot be right. I have been strongly assured by online people that Abbott's order regarding "1 mailbox for ballots per county" is voter suppression and that is must be stopped. There is no way that there could be criminal proceedings that prompted him to make this decision.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Probably the better question. Why would I trust any person Soros pushes to be elected?

a reply to: neutronflux

That's nice, Soros isn't part of the topic.

a reply to: Annee
That's not entirely true. When Ron Paul got "sandersized" by the Republicans it was kind of a big deal.

originally posted by: Bobaganoosh
a reply to: Annee
That's not entirely true. When Ron Paul got "sandersized" by the Republicans it was kind of a big deal.

Can we stay in the current election?

ATS is not the same today as it was back then.

I read a lot. There have been vote issues with Republicans that are not brought up.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: neutronflux

That's nice, Soros isn't part of the topic.

Who is the current DA of Harris County Texas. Is that where the cited story takes place?

Billionaire Soros makes $500K ad buy for Democratic DA candidiate Ogg

www.chron.com...

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Bobaganoosh
a reply to: Annee
That's not entirely true. When Ron Paul got "sandersized" by the Republicans it was kind of a big deal.

Can we stay in the current election?

ATS is not the same today as it was back then.

I read a lot. There have been vote issues with Republicans that are not brought up.

Yeap. It’s sad ATS liberals have been blinded by some of the biggest political conspiracies created by the democrats.

originally posted by: neutronflux
Who is the current DA of Harris County Texas. Is that where the cited story takes place?

Who cares? Election fraud is handled by the state AG who is a Republican.

originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Bobaganoosh
a reply to: Annee
That's not entirely true. When Ron Paul got "sandersized" by the Republicans it was kind of a big deal.

Can we stay in the current election?

ATS is not the same today as it was back then.

I read a lot. There have been vote issues with Republicans that are not brought up.

Yeap. It’s sad ATS liberals have been blinded by some of the biggest political conspiracies created by the democrats.

Give me a break.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Bobaganoosh
a reply to: Annee
That's not entirely true. When Ron Paul got "sandersized" by the Republicans it was kind of a big deal.

Can we stay in the current election?

ATS is not the same today as it was back then.

I read a lot. There have been vote issues with Republicans that are not brought up.

Yeap. It’s sad ATS liberals have been blinded by some of the biggest political conspiracies created by the democrats.

Give me a break.

But you don’t know what’s in the Mueller Report.


Hahahahaha...


How many times was that a talking point on ATS.

a reply to: Annee

There is a reason way many liberal posters evaporated from ATS. They know they were played the fools. Useful idiots.

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Annee

There is a reason way many liberal posters evaporated from ATS

Yes there is.

It’s pointless to try to debate “pretzels”.

There are real discussion boards elsewhere.

originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Bobaganoosh
a reply to: Annee
That's not entirely true. When Ron Paul got "sandersized" by the Republicans it was kind of a big deal.

Can we stay in the current election?

ATS is not the same today as it was back then.

I read a lot. There have been vote issues with Republicans that are not brought up.

Yeap. It’s sad ATS liberals have been blinded by some of the biggest political conspiracies created by the democrats.

Give me a break.

But you don’t know what’s in the Mueller Report.


Hahahahaha...


How many times was that a talking point on ATS.

And you do?

a reply to: Annee

To be fair, there is no "debate" on the internet. There are echo chambers, and there are battlegrounds. No opinions are swayed or changed.

You and I may represent one of the few places where people actually discuss stuff rather than scream at each other, or simply back clap in approval.

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
No opinions are swayed or changed.

My opinion on certain people have changed. I used to think some of them might be insane, now I know they're 100% certifiable.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: SleeperHasAwakened
Who are the investigators testifying "under oath" to...

The one document I saw was notarized and attested to by the person's relative alleging the claims. Texas doesn't preclude notaries from affixing their seal to a relative's legal documents so this can be considered a 'sworn statement' as the notary signed off on it.

Idid find this after a brief search not sure of the outcome still looking.

Sounds like they were sending mail ballots to unsolitcited voters and they are only supposed to do that for 65 and older.

a reply to: putnam6

That's a good catch but I don't think the details in that video are the same as what was posted in the Original Post.