Oregon Woman Holds Suspected Arsonist At Gunpoint As Wildfires Rage

Not seeing the private property thing unless she owns a road , with powerlines .

Only charges that will be prosecuted will be trespassing Unless they can show he intended to start a fire .
GET real matches does Not = arson but if having a way to star a fire is all we now need to for arson charges well then NEVER ever have a lighter or matches heck a magnifying glass even .


How many of you DONT smoke but have a lighter or matches around ?
The guy may have wanted to start a fire But may have is NOT admissible as evidence in court .

IM Not defending this man I am defending MY right YOUR right HIS right to a trial by piers . Something most poster here totaly ignore .
all the work the Constitution -[ bill or rights and every one will trough it out the window fin a heart beat .
Honstly we had a good idea now the problem is living up to that idea .

Well, he also was trespassing on her property, so I’m ok with it.

a reply to: Subaeruginosa

How many of you hold a box of matches you aren’t intending to use? Just nervously flirting with it in your hands, while on someone else’s property? Your logic would defend a child molester who was just walking by the dark shady tree n the back of your yard near the road where your child is playing...

At what point do you defend your child?

a reply to: midnightstar