Election Month Nightmare Scenario

a reply to: ntech

There typically is (or should be) an exception for military because they are posted all over the world and international mail can be very slow.

duplicate

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: SKEPTEK
Maybe because I was 20 years younger. 20 years less wise.

20 years a liberal who hadn't opened his eyes.

Then you best lock and load tough guy, the election results most likely won't be known for a while.

It's likely but you must admit how in the hell did America pull off so many elections without a hitch? We have done elections with troops being deployed for and wide, and you only bring a few that have had to be extended. LOL if we have known there will be issues months in advance and don't address them, then that's on politics on both sides of the aisle

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

As I pointed out earlier there have been multiple time when the winner was not known until well after election day, it's nothing new.

I realize that indeed sir. But you see why it should be as I said.
There should be a cut off time on election DAY. I remember Bush
Gore perfectly.

originally posted by: putnam6
It's likely but you to admit how in the hell did America pull off so many elections with out a hitch?

The same way we pulled off the ones with hitches, which happened far more times than people think.

a reply to: putnam6

They held the House and Senate elections in 1918.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: SKEPTEK
Maybe because I was 20 years younger. 20 years less wise.

20 years a liberal who hadn't opened his eyes.

Then you best lock and load tough guy, the election results most likely won't be known for a while.

I'll be in Blue buddy. You'll be gray.

Hopefully we'll meet some day.

originally posted by: carsforkids
There should be a cut off time on election DAY.

The cutoff to vote is election day, the cutoff to count and submit each state's vote totals is six days before the Electoral College votes.

There's a process, the problem is all the partisan ignoramuses don't know it.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Trump could veto that. And the Republicans in the Senate should bottle up any such bill until after the election. Though after this election you would think CONgress would look at regulating elections for Federal offices with cutoff dates and rules for mail in voting. Currently there is simply too much leeway for rigging/corrupting elections.

originally posted by: SKEPTEK
I'll be in Blue buddy. You'll be gray.

Hopefully we'll meet some day.

Cool story bro.

I guarantee you'll be sitting on your ass and not shooting anything come November 4th.

originally posted by: ntech
Trump could veto that.

Not if enough members vote for it.

In 2016 they didn't count all the mail in ballots, because it was pretty obvious Trump won.

2020 will not be the same. The Dems will cry till their side wins, making sure every fake mail in ballot is counted.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

There's a process, the problem is all the partisan ignoramuses don't know it.

how could they not know it's pretty much common knowledge. Maybe
because candidates concede on election night?

I have a bet with a buddy that semi loads of ballots will appear well after the election.

Hope I'm wrong.

originally posted by: carsforkids
how could they not know it's pretty much common knowledge.

This thread proves it's not common knowledge.

Maybe because candidates concede on election night?

Not always, as I pointed out.

I will go do my civic duty and vote for the best person for the job by looking at the demonstration of accomplishments and failures in their history. I think its a worthless vote tho I am convinced the democratics lack of moral principles will enable them to cheat their way into the white house through cheating, deligitimizing the American voice, or taking it by force. At that point I am not sure how to move forward I have already began to prepare my business for closure and have began applying with corporate giants and adapting a liberal view of the world. While quite a few of my employees will be without work, but there is no way running a small business is sustainable under socialist rule. I caught hell in the Obama days and I suspect those will be the good ole days soon.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Not always, as I pointed out.

I realize that but when it does happen people tend to remember that
more for whatever reason. Before the 2000 fiasco I was that way. I didn't
know s%$^ in this regard. But I'm just try'n to say I understand votes
need counting I guess. Well I might be wrong about that. lol

originally posted by: carsforkids
I realize that but when it does happen people tend to remember that
more for whatever reason.

People are obviously not remembering it based on the moronic comments.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
I don't know what your eyes and ears told you in 2000
But mine heard Gore concede the Election on Election Night
And my eyes saw all the major media outlets proclaim Bush the Winner
Gore's later challenge only delayed the inevitable
But most people knew Bush was the President Elect
Only the die hard leftists ever believed that Gore was the next President after Election Night 2000

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Just to be clear, which way did you swing in 1876: Rutherford B. Hayes or Sam Tilden. You weren't still voting Whig at that point right?