It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: peaceinoutz
a reply to: mirageman
The question is who organized all that hoopla in those mass media stories in 2017 over ATTIP which TTSA eventually leached off of and got kickstarted.
originally posted by: peaceinoutz
a reply to: mirageman
The question is who organized all that hoopla in those mass media stories in 2017 over ATTIP which TTSA eventually leached off of and got kickstarted.
originally posted by: mirageman
originally posted by: peaceinoutz
a reply to: mirageman
The question is who organized all that hoopla in those mass media stories in 2017 over ATTIP which TTSA eventually leached off of and got kickstarted.
A very well funded organization with the clout to 'influence' various media platforms. You only need to return to the OP of this thread to see how it has worked out in the past.
originally posted by: Jukiodone
originally posted by: peaceinoutz
a reply to: mirageman
The question is who organized all that hoopla in those mass media stories in 2017 over ATTIP which TTSA eventually leached off of and got kickstarted.
Now we can look back and see how many mountains were actually moved ......(earlier ITT we thought Justice had done something wrong and TTSA might be his punishment LOL)- it looks like there might only be 2 realistic options.
The President/ Other recognised legitimate Authority within the US govt.
Some sort of Pan-Presidential C.O.G shadow entity a la Dark Journalist/Farrell theories.
Whoever it was - they mobilised lots of boy scouts.
Boy scouts always follow the rules.
Only legitimate authorities can set the rules.
To those who would argue "science can't prove everything," I would remind them this isn't my hill to die on. Defending their argument is the responsibility of Team Bigelow, To The Stars, the federally funded AAWSAP, and everyone else who brought metaphysical beliefs to a scientific debate. If they don't want their assertions subjected to scientific standards of evidence and the related protocols, don't call it science.
Green believes his patients have described very quiet, advanced drones. Some seem to be black triangles.
Meanwhile, members of the Vegas UFO Mob go around telling tales of how they took poltergeists home from the ranch.
....It starts and ends with standards of evidence. If you compromise the extent you are committed to fact-checking from the very outset of an interaction with someone, it is reasonable to question what other "facts" get compromised along the way in pursuit of YouTube viewers and website hits.
It's almost as if the UFO/UAP topic is being used as a metaphor by some of these folk for something that is causing brain injuries and other anomalous effects on humans.