It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: Nothin
Oh dear, someone rich who put some money into philanthropic endeavours.
How dare he!
Oh dear, someone rich who put some money into philanthropic endeavours.
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: Nothin
Oh dear, someone rich who put some money into philanthropic endeavours.
How dare he!
originally posted by: NorthOfStuff
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: Nothin
Oh dear, someone rich who put some money into philanthropic endeavours.
How dare he!
The first one is a 2 hour video with some compelling information so far.
I haven’t finished watching it yet. After I do I may comment.
What do you think of the video and the information that it contains?
originally posted by: dug88
a reply to: NorthOfStuff
I've watched the whole two hour video previously. Definitely worth the watch. There's some good info there, stuff I'd never heard before.
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: Nothin
Oh dear, someone rich who put some money into philanthropic endeavours.
How dare he!
First, the facts. Bill Gates has used his immense wealth to garner influence and media time, spreading his message of fixing global health issues while he continues to make billions. Using the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to dole out grants and donations, Gates has created a web of organizations who owe their budget to the foundation or answer directly to Gates. By tracing the Foundation’s investments and Gates’ relationships we can see that nearly every person involved in the fight against COVID-19 is tied to Gates or his foundation by two degrees or less.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: NorthOfStuff
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: Nothin
Oh dear, someone rich who put some money into philanthropic endeavours.
How dare he!
The first one is a 2 hour video with some compelling information so far.
I haven’t finished watching it yet. After I do I may comment.
What do you think of the video and the information that it contains?
I haven't seen it yet and I'm probably not going to waste my time doing so.
The reason is because I have seen very many of these similar accusations and while they sound awfully bad, they all have no idea of how any such technology works or of if it is even possible.
Take for instance the idea of including some sort of 'smart chip' in an immunization. Presumably such a chip, because it is internal to the body, would have to be read via some remote system like radio waves. The problem with that is that for an aerial to work, it has to subtend at least a 1/4 of the wavelength. For any appreciable chip you'd have to have a power supply and it would have to generate its own or resonate with an induced signal. It would be millimeters in size at minimum with any currently known technology. So, the idea of the injection of such a chip as part of an immunization, and it actually functioning, is clearly BS.
- Ditto for the majority of the FaceBork repost idiocies.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: NorthOfStuff
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: Nothin
Oh dear, someone rich who put some money into philanthropic endeavours.
How dare he!
The first one is a 2 hour video with some compelling information so far.
I haven’t finished watching it yet. After I do I may comment.
What do you think of the video and the information that it contains?
I haven't seen it yet and I'm probably not going to waste my time doing so.
The reason is because I have seen very many of these similar accusations and while they sound awfully bad, they all have no idea of how any such technology works or of if it is even possible.
Take for instance the idea of including some sort of 'smart chip' in an immunization. Presumably such a chip, because it is internal to the body, would have to be read via some remote system like radio waves. The problem with that is that for an aerial to work, it has to subtend at least a 1/4 of the wavelength. For any appreciable chip you'd have to have a power supply and it would have to generate its own or resonate with an induced signal. It would be millimeters in size at minimum with any currently known technology. So, the idea of the injection of such a chip as part of an immunization, and it actually functioning, is clearly BS.
- Ditto for the majority of the FaceBork repost idiocies.
... and you don't 'monopolize' an industry by investing in it. You monopolize it by being the only one in that industry. Clearly, the health industry has; hospitals, schools, workers, drug companies &, etc, all across the world who openly compete against each other.
The “Wellness Pass” Partnership
With the aim of being introduced in “low-income, remote communities” in West Africa and later replicated worldwide; the program is the result of a public-private partnership between the GAVI vaccine alliance backed by Bill Gates, Mastercard and Trust Stamp which is an AI-powered “identity authentication” company.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: dug88
Yes, tattoo not microchip. It is basicly a barcode that shows what vaccines a person has. They could probably add additional medical info to it as well.
You read the articles? Because, that is what they say.
In Sweden, cash is almost extinct and people implant microchips in their hands to pay for things