It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: chr0naut
Take for instance the idea of including some sort of 'smart chip' in an immunization. Presumably such a chip, because it is internal to the body, would have to be read via some remote system like radio waves. The problem with that is that for an aerial to work, it has to subtend at least a 1/4 of the wavelength. For any appreciable chip you'd have to have a power supply and it would have to generate its own or resonate with an induced signal. It would be millimeters in size at minimum with any currently known technology. So, the idea of the injection of such a chip as part of an immunization, and it actually functioning, is clearly BS.
originally posted by: chr0naut
We are perhaps 25-100 years away from that sort of tech. Definitely, if we can't cure a common cold, or cure cancer, then I don't think we can build the trillions of nanomachines necessary for this sort of feat.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: SeaWorthy
a reply to: chr0naut
Musk's neuralink is not even connected to what has been developed by the military.
Your video is "unavailable"
Also, I have seen those movies too.
You know, the ones where the supersoldier finds out the evil schemes of the General and turns against him, destroying the base/labs. Then they get the girl and fade off into the sunset.
Funny how the grunts, though, are still running around with bang sticks and getting shot and blown up. Where are all those super soldiers hiding when you need them?
originally posted by: menneni
originally posted by: chr0naut
Take for instance the idea of including some sort of 'smart chip' in an immunization. Presumably such a chip, because it is internal to the body, would have to be read via some remote system like radio waves. The problem with that is that for an aerial to work, it has to subtend at least a 1/4 of the wavelength. For any appreciable chip you'd have to have a power supply and it would have to generate its own or resonate with an induced signal. It would be millimeters in size at minimum with any currently known technology. So, the idea of the injection of such a chip as part of an immunization, and it actually functioning, is clearly BS.
Man, i really respect your postings allaround, but would like to address this somewhat:
the new rolling tech, 5G, has a wavelenght of 7mm (39ghz)
1/4 of the that is what, less than 2 millimeters.
Any device sized 2mm, doesnt really need much power, so perhaps you might think its feasible to power it wirelessly/passively, or you could generate power from the body. I don't know it that is possible, but its not totally bs, right?
I totally agree, that injecting any smart chip is whack idea, but can't say its 100% bs. Nano-stuff and all that jazz.
/end-of-random-rambling-before-my-morning-coffee
originally posted by: SeaWorthy
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: SeaWorthy
a reply to: chr0naut
Musk's neuralink is not even connected to what has been developed by the military.
Your video is "unavailable"
Also, I have seen those movies too.
You know, the ones where the supersoldier finds out the evil schemes of the General and turns against him, destroying the base/labs. Then they get the girl and fade off into the sunset.
Funny how the grunts, though, are still running around with bang sticks and getting shot and blown up. Where are all those super soldiers hiding when you need them?
Review Article
Published: 15 July 2020
COVID-19 vaccine development and a potential nanomaterial path forward
Matthew D. Shin, Sourabh Shukla, Young Hun Chung, Veronique Beiss, Soo Khim Chan, Oscar A. Ortega-Rivera, David M. Wirth, Angela Chen, Markus Sack, Jonatha
www.nature.com...
originally posted by: TheWhiteKnight
a reply to: chr0naut
How on earth does one give oneself stars....?
# 1141
originally posted by: menneni
originally posted by: chr0naut
We are perhaps 25-100 years away from that sort of tech. Definitely, if we can't cure a common cold, or cure cancer, then I don't think we can build the trillions of nanomachines necessary for this sort of feat.
Well said.
Well said 2nd.
The political motivation behind vaccines is not in anyone's interest unless
you are part of the political motivation. Fauci and Gates are political
motivators. I believe Kennedy says it perfectly " What Fauci says about
vaccines is not science". If you want to hear some truth on vaccines? If
you haven't closed your mind about the topic. Then I believe Kennedy
is in deed a straight shooter. Far more than Gates is at the very least.
Source vid.
originally posted by: primalfractal
Coronavirus vaccine: Scott Morrison announces free COVID-19 vaccines for Australians
Prime Minister Scott Morrison says a COVID-19 vaccine will be mandatory for all Australians once it becomes available.
news.com.au
Well here it is, the line in the sand. Words can not express my disgust.
Is it "The Mark of the Beast"? IDK but it just sounds to damn close to it for me to give it a chance.
I do not trust any vaccines, let alone a rushed, unproven and potentially seriously dangerous one, that probably doesn't even work.
Hoping and working towards being totally self sufficient by mid 2021 when this comes into effect.
If that doesn't happen, they can inject my corpse.