It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Spider879
originally posted by: eletheia
SOoooo......does that mean that the black population can no longer use
slavery to promote 'white guilt'?
You know it's not just about "Slavery" which was common in almost all African, Asian and adjoining middle east societies but racializing the institution, where as before it was an unfortunate condition, that had nothing to do with what you could not control about yourself, your physical make up, add to that the form it took in the west..that of chattel , which was particularly dehumanizing , leaving very little room for upward mobility, now because of the racialization of that peculiar institution , attitude of worth came into being , and followed us post slavery, thus modern racism and its fallout is connected to it.
Another thing, it was not Black folks who denied white folks were never slaves, lay that on those white folks who wrote books that made it seemed White folks were just too damned superior to ever being slaves, especially to none Whites, that attitude is still a thing among many today , with taunts of some white Ppl that their ancestors owned "BLACK SLAVES"
originally posted by: Spider879
You know it's not just about "Slavery" which was common in almost all African, Asian and adjoining middle east societies but racializing the institution, where as before it was an unfortunate condition, that had nothing to do with what you could not control about yourself, your physical make up, add to that the form it took in the west..that of chattel , which was particularly dehumanizing , leaving very little room for upward mobility, now because of the racialization of that peculiar institution , attitude of worth came into being , and followed us post slavery, thus modern racism and its fallout is connected to it.
originally posted by: eletheia
originally posted by: Spider879
You know it's not just about "Slavery" which was common in almost all African, Asian and adjoining middle east societies but racializing the institution, where as before it was an unfortunate condition, that had nothing to do with what you could not control about yourself, your physical make up, add to that the form it took in the west..that of chattel , which was particularly dehumanizing , leaving very little room for upward mobility, now because of the racialization of that peculiar institution , attitude of worth came into being , and followed us post slavery, thus modern racism and its fallout is connected to it.
The same could be said for women?
They too were chattel and belongings?
The thing about the past is that we 'should' have learned to be better
people and the past should stay in the past where it belongs ...... and
not being constantly raked up to justify the inability of self esteem of
others.
originally posted by: eletheia
originally posted by: Spider879
You know it's not just about "Slavery" which was common in almost all African, Asian and adjoining middle east societies but racializing the institution, where as before it was an unfortunate condition, that had nothing to do with what you could not control about yourself, your physical make up, add to that the form it took in the west..that of chattel , which was particularly dehumanizing , leaving very little room for upward mobility, now because of the racialization of that peculiar institution , attitude of worth came into being , and followed us post slavery, thus modern racism and its fallout is connected to it.
^^^^ The same could be said for women?
They too were chattel and belongings?
The thing about the past is that we 'should' have learned to be better
people and the past should stay in the past where it belongs ...... and
not being constantly raked up to justify the lack of self esteem of others.
originally posted by: Lysergic
originally posted by: eletheia
originally posted by: Spider879
You know it's not just about "Slavery" which was common in almost all African, Asian and adjoining middle east societies but racializing the institution, where as before it was an unfortunate condition, that had nothing to do with what you could not control about yourself, your physical make up, add to that the form it took in the west..that of chattel , which was particularly dehumanizing , leaving very little room for upward mobility, now because of the racialization of that peculiar institution , attitude of worth came into being , and followed us post slavery, thus modern racism and its fallout is connected to it.
The same could be said for women?
They too were chattel and belongings?
The thing about the past is that we 'should' have learned to be better
people and the past should stay in the past where it belongs ...... and
not being constantly raked up to justify the inability of self esteem of
others.
Seems like during the times of kings and emperors everyone was owned. No?
When slaves were emancipated and freed, the family and their "help", as my aunt corrected us in her stories, cried due to the separation and uncertain future they now faced.
The problem is that eighty per cent of the population fall for it.
and these are the same principles we find ourselves all working under now
a reply to: DeathSlayer
What you speak of is true. Not only did the Jew practice this but most of the world. It was a way to pay off debt.
originally posted by: anonentity
The problem with slavery is that its not much of a problem as long as you are not the one being used as a slave. But fifty years before the first slave left Africa for the Americas, The white slave markets of North Africa had already taken over a million white slaves. The problem was so great the British navy had to be greatly expanded to cope with the slave raids on the coastal villages. It is a sad part of this sorry story which seems to be left out of the history books.
originally posted by: carsforkids
a reply to: anonentity
Why does everyone believe this crap that people were enslaved
because of racism. If the people of Africa were brown instead of
black. How much difference would it have made to the slave market?
Or slave owners? The people of Africa and Native Americans were
both treated horribly for one reason only. The civilized world saw
them as savages first. No matter what skin color they had.
originally posted by: halfoldman
Many other forms too - for example the armies and navies at the time.
Not all those men were willing recruits.
There were press-gangs, and young drunk men could suddenly go missing.
Wakey, wakey - party last night dude?
Ouch my head, why does everything seem so wavey?
Because we are now in the mid-Atlantic, and you are a slave of the Dutch East India Company.
In Portland they actually had trap-doors in the pubs.
Having a cheers - whoops, you've been shanghaied and sold to a navy.
Let's not even talk about Australia, and "convict" labor.
Slavery in effect.
Those last few posts are pretty enlightening, who would have guessed.
Actually RACISM was later used as a tool, the greatest gift the Slave traders in western Europe and the America's had was Charles Darwin's theory of Evolution which was used to try to make the Black African's and other native peoples into other than human being's, it was used by these despicable men also against the lower classes in there own society's.