It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Most people are not "digging" into what's really going on, because they're not miserable. But, if the Congress doesn't pass the Stop-Gap emergency unemployment compensation continuance bill that President Trump is pushing, there will be 25 million angry out-of-work Americans demanding that their governors fully re-open....and re-establish things exactly as they were before March of this year.
originally posted by: deadlysyn
a reply to: carewemust
At the end of the day, it would be nice to have the real numbers. I would be willing to bet it's significantly lower than 0.04%. it doesn't help that we don't know how many actually died of other causes but still had Covid listed as the cause of death.
If HHS-CDC really wanted to, they could look at all 152,000 deaths certificates where Covid-19 was listed, and determine if it was listed as a primary cause of death, present at the time of death, or "suspected" at the time of death.
originally posted by: carsforkids
a reply to: deadlysyn
Just think how bad it would be if venues like this didn't help keep em in check?
In this case, the mass hysteria and the confusion over the numbers has rendered all that data useless. If someone dies from a heart attack while being suspected of SARS-2, researchers will see a death certificate that reads "SARS-2." They will then look at the treatments given... which of course are all treatments for a heart attack! That not only wastes researchers' time, it can easily cause them to make improper guesses as to what treatment might be more appropriate. I believe this led directly to many unnecessary deaths because researchers were trying to figure out which deaths were really from SARS-2 and which weren't. They likely didn't make the connection to an actual cardio issue because they were used to overlooking cardio deaths as false reports. So the ventilators kept being used on contraindicated settings for a longer period of time.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: carsforkids
a reply to: carewemust
CNN and MSNBC tell blatant falsehoods, and ignore any positive Covid-19 developments.
You think people really ignore/don't see this blatant conspiracy or are they just trolling?
People understand that the Covid-19 hysteria ginned up by the national outlets, and also by the local media, is baseless, but they go along with it.
They put on their mask when going into Target, but don't stop to consider if it's a good mask for protection, because Covid-19 is not affecting 99% of the U.S. population under age 70, in a significant way.
What people need to hear is what I outlined in the OP....and, the ratio of negative to positive tests....The number who have recovered...that only 4/100th of 1% of Americans have died of Covid-19......that FLA/TX/CA will recover like Arizona is now, and the Northeast/Midwest did in June-July.
In our national health statistics group here in Hyattsville, we review all those death certificates, so I think it's probably less operable in the cause of death. Although I won't say it’s not some cases.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
Right after the part you quote in your OP.
In our national health statistics group here in Hyattsville, we review all those death certificates, so I think it's probably less operable in the cause of death. Although I won't say it’s not some cases.
“In our national health statistics group here in Hyattsville, we review all those death certificates, so I think it's probably less operable in the cause of death. Although I won't say it’s not some cases. I do think though when it comes to hospital reimbursement issues for individuals, they get discharged, there could be some play in that for sure,” he added.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: ScepticScot
Right after the part you quote in your OP.
In our national health statistics group here in Hyattsville, we review all those death certificates, so I think it's probably less operable in the cause of death. Although I won't say it’s not some cases.
This entire paragraph reads like someone who is just blathering to blather. Who talks like that? What is Redfield trying to say? Sounds like a nervous person covering up for their failure...and doing a bad job of it, LOL.
“In our national health statistics group here in Hyattsville, we review all those death certificates, so I think it's probably less operable in the cause of death. Although I won't say it’s not some cases. I do think though when it comes to hospital reimbursement issues for individuals, they get discharged, there could be some play in that for sure,” he added.