It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It's explained in the link I posted earlier:
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Arbitrageur
What are the practical limitations they are encountering with distance?
The article goes on to explain how they are trying to deal with that using quantum repeaters, and the problems with those.
entanglement falls victim to decoupling and the no cloning theorem. Decoupling is the tendency for entangled particles to become disentangled due to interaction with their surroundings, while the no cloning theorem states that quantum states cannot be copied.
This makes long distance communication difficult...
The correlation of entangled particles has been measured to be at least 10,000 times faster than the speed of light (iirc) so instantaneous is not ruled out by that. But, remember the entangled particles we are talking about are photons, and photons only travel at the speed of light, so Bob still can't send photons to Alice any faster than light. So we have to wait for the speed of light for the photons to go from Bob to Alice, then instantaneously their measurements can correlate, but how do they know what each other measured? They don't at the instant the measurements are made, so they have to "compare notes" and what do they need to do that? Another communication channel called "classical" meaning light speed, so even though instantaneous quantum things happen, light speed is not circumvented and so far nobody has figured out how to defeat the "no communication theorem", though not for a lack of trying:
originally posted by: andy06shake
Then again should they manage lick the problem its the perfect medium communication wise, which would be instantaneous, is that correct?
“Does this mean we have the technology for building a wormhole?” asks Matt Visser at the Victoria University of Wellington in New Zealand. “The answer is still no.” Still, he is intrigued by Butcher’s work. “From a physics perspective, it may revitalise interest in wormholes.”